Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus prevention among adults aged 50 years and older in Germany.
Maria Waize, Pavo Marijic, Alen Marijam, Foteini Gkalapi, Elisa Turriani, Franziska Jakobs, Indra Jaidhauser, Dorothea Münch, Sara Pedron, Eleftherios Zarkadoulas
{"title":"Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus prevention among adults aged 50 years and older in Germany.","authors":"Maria Waize, Pavo Marijic, Alen Marijam, Foteini Gkalapi, Elisa Turriani, Franziska Jakobs, Indra Jaidhauser, Dorothea Münch, Sara Pedron, Eleftherios Zarkadoulas","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2539887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract disease in older adults. Vaccination is effective against RSV disease and can reduce disease and economic burden.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A static, multicohort Markov model was adapted to the German setting to estimate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination strategies from a societal perspective in three target populations: 1) at increased risk (AIR) adults aged 50-59 years and all adults ≥60 years, 2) all adults aged ≥60 years, and 3) AIR adults aged 60-74 years and all adults ≥75 years. A cycle length of 1 month and a 5-year time horizon were adopted. Vaccine coverage was 75% in the base case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RSV vaccination is cost-effective versus no vaccination (<€50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold): incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €19,789, €19,631, and €12,733 for strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively; 1.6, 1.4, and 0.8 million outpatient visits and 192,402, 185,238, and 152,781 hospitalizations could be prevented with strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expanding RSV vaccination to a larger target population would prevent more RSV cases, though at a higher cost per case averted; all vaccination strategies would be deemed cost-effective in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"782-796"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2539887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract disease in older adults. Vaccination is effective against RSV disease and can reduce disease and economic burden.
Research design and methods: A static, multicohort Markov model was adapted to the German setting to estimate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination strategies from a societal perspective in three target populations: 1) at increased risk (AIR) adults aged 50-59 years and all adults ≥60 years, 2) all adults aged ≥60 years, and 3) AIR adults aged 60-74 years and all adults ≥75 years. A cycle length of 1 month and a 5-year time horizon were adopted. Vaccine coverage was 75% in the base case.
Results: RSV vaccination is cost-effective versus no vaccination (<€50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold): incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €19,789, €19,631, and €12,733 for strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively; 1.6, 1.4, and 0.8 million outpatient visits and 192,402, 185,238, and 152,781 hospitalizations could be prevented with strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Conclusions: Expanding RSV vaccination to a larger target population would prevent more RSV cases, though at a higher cost per case averted; all vaccination strategies would be deemed cost-effective in Germany.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.