{"title":"Parvovirus B19-associated myocarditis in children: A systematic review of clinical features, management and outcomes.","authors":"Giacomo Veronese, Giada Colombo, Andrea Garascia, Rachele Adorisio, Ezio Bonanomi, Enrico Ammirati","doi":"10.1111/eci.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parvovirus B19 (PVB19) has emerged as a relevant etiologic agent of paediatric myocarditis, particularly during recent epidemiological surges in Europe and the United States. Despite increasing recognition, current knowledge remains fragmented, and standardised diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to May 2025, including 40 studies encompassing 53 individual case reports, 107 patients from registry-based cohorts, and 4 tissue-based investigations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical presentation was frequently fulminant, with cardiogenic shock, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and need for mechanical circulatory support in up to 47% of cases. Mortality rates ranged from 10% to 30%, with heart transplantation rates varying between 5% and 42% across cohorts. Diagnosis relied primarily on blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while serology showed limited diagnostic utility. Histological confirmation via endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) was variably applied across studies, and myocardial viral load quantification was reported in only one study. Case series and cohort studies confirmed early age of onset (median 16-24 months), respiratory or gastrointestinal prodromes, and poor outcomes in fulminant presentations. Tissue-based studies revealed high myocardial PVB19 loads in acute myocarditis, particularly in infants, but also demonstrated viral persistence in asymptomatic individuals, complicating causal inference. Immunomodulatory therapy was administered in up to 58% of cases, although its clinical impact remains uncertain due to heterogeneity in treatment protocols. No antiviral treatments have been evaluated to date.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the need for standardised diagnostic criteria incorporating PCR, serology, imaging, and, where appropriate, EMB and viral load assessment. Given recent epidemiologic surges and high morbidity, prospective multicentre studies and surveillance efforts are urgently required to refine clinical algorithms and improve outcomes in paediatric PVB19 myocarditis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e70102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.70102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Parvovirus B19 (PVB19) has emerged as a relevant etiologic agent of paediatric myocarditis, particularly during recent epidemiological surges in Europe and the United States. Despite increasing recognition, current knowledge remains fragmented, and standardised diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are lacking.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to May 2025, including 40 studies encompassing 53 individual case reports, 107 patients from registry-based cohorts, and 4 tissue-based investigations.
Results: Clinical presentation was frequently fulminant, with cardiogenic shock, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and need for mechanical circulatory support in up to 47% of cases. Mortality rates ranged from 10% to 30%, with heart transplantation rates varying between 5% and 42% across cohorts. Diagnosis relied primarily on blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while serology showed limited diagnostic utility. Histological confirmation via endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) was variably applied across studies, and myocardial viral load quantification was reported in only one study. Case series and cohort studies confirmed early age of onset (median 16-24 months), respiratory or gastrointestinal prodromes, and poor outcomes in fulminant presentations. Tissue-based studies revealed high myocardial PVB19 loads in acute myocarditis, particularly in infants, but also demonstrated viral persistence in asymptomatic individuals, complicating causal inference. Immunomodulatory therapy was administered in up to 58% of cases, although its clinical impact remains uncertain due to heterogeneity in treatment protocols. No antiviral treatments have been evaluated to date.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the need for standardised diagnostic criteria incorporating PCR, serology, imaging, and, where appropriate, EMB and viral load assessment. Given recent epidemiologic surges and high morbidity, prospective multicentre studies and surveillance efforts are urgently required to refine clinical algorithms and improve outcomes in paediatric PVB19 myocarditis.
期刊介绍:
EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.