Identity-Based Provable Data Possession with Designated Verifier from Lattices for Cloud Computing.

IF 2 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.3390/e27070753
Mengdi Zhao, Huiyan Chen
{"title":"Identity-Based Provable Data Possession with Designated Verifier from Lattices for Cloud Computing.","authors":"Mengdi Zhao, Huiyan Chen","doi":"10.3390/e27070753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Provable data possession (PDP) is a technique that enables the verification of data integrity in cloud storage without the need to download the data. PDP schemes are generally categorized into public and private verification. Public verification allows third parties to assess the integrity of outsourced data, offering good openness and flexibility, but it may lead to privacy leakage and security risks. In contrast, private verification restricts the auditing capability to the data owner, providing better privacy protection but often resulting in higher verification costs and operational complexity due to limited local resources. Moreover, most existing PDP schemes are based on classical number-theoretic assumptions, making them vulnerable to quantum attacks. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an identity-based PDP with a designated verifier over lattices, utilizing a specially leveled identity-based fully homomorphic signature (IB-FHS) scheme. We provide a formal security proof of the proposed scheme under the small-integer solution (SIS) and learning with errors (LWE) within the random oracle model. Theoretical analysis confirms that the scheme achieves security guarantees while maintaining practical feasibility. Furthermore, simulation-based experiments show that for a 1 MB file and lattice dimension of <i>n</i> = 128, the computation times for core algorithms such as <b>TagGen</b>, <b>GenProof</b>, and <b>CheckProof</b> are approximately 20.76 s, 13.75 s, and 3.33 s, respectively. Compared to existing lattice-based PDP schemes, the proposed scheme introduces additional overhead due to the designated verifier mechanism; however, it achieves a well-balanced optimization among functionality, security, and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12294395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e27070753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Provable data possession (PDP) is a technique that enables the verification of data integrity in cloud storage without the need to download the data. PDP schemes are generally categorized into public and private verification. Public verification allows third parties to assess the integrity of outsourced data, offering good openness and flexibility, but it may lead to privacy leakage and security risks. In contrast, private verification restricts the auditing capability to the data owner, providing better privacy protection but often resulting in higher verification costs and operational complexity due to limited local resources. Moreover, most existing PDP schemes are based on classical number-theoretic assumptions, making them vulnerable to quantum attacks. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an identity-based PDP with a designated verifier over lattices, utilizing a specially leveled identity-based fully homomorphic signature (IB-FHS) scheme. We provide a formal security proof of the proposed scheme under the small-integer solution (SIS) and learning with errors (LWE) within the random oracle model. Theoretical analysis confirms that the scheme achieves security guarantees while maintaining practical feasibility. Furthermore, simulation-based experiments show that for a 1 MB file and lattice dimension of n = 128, the computation times for core algorithms such as TagGen, GenProof, and CheckProof are approximately 20.76 s, 13.75 s, and 3.33 s, respectively. Compared to existing lattice-based PDP schemes, the proposed scheme introduces additional overhead due to the designated verifier mechanism; however, it achieves a well-balanced optimization among functionality, security, and efficiency.

云计算网格中基于身份的可证明数据占有与指定验证者。
可证明数据占有(PDP)是一种无需下载数据就可以验证云存储中的数据完整性的技术。PDP方案一般分为公开验证和私有验证。公开验证允许第三方评估外包数据的完整性,具有良好的开放性和灵活性,但可能导致隐私泄露和安全风险。相比之下,私有验证将审计能力限制在数据所有者身上,提供了更好的隐私保护,但由于本地资源有限,通常会导致更高的验证成本和操作复杂性。此外,大多数现有的PDP方案都是基于经典的数论假设,这使得它们容易受到量子攻击。为了解决这些问题,本文利用一种特殊的基于身份的完全同态签名(IB-FHS)方案,提出了一种具有指定验证者的基于身份的PDP。在随机oracle模型的小整数解(SIS)和带误差学习(LWE)下,给出了该方案的形式化安全性证明。理论分析证实,该方案在保持实际可行性的同时,实现了安全保障。此外,基于仿真的实验表明,对于1 MB的文件和n = 128的格维,TagGen、GenProof和CheckProof等核心算法的计算时间分别约为20.76 s、13.75 s和3.33 s。与现有的基于格子的PDP方案相比,由于指定验证者机制,该方案引入了额外的开销;但是,它在功能、安全性和效率之间实现了很好的平衡优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信