Liwen Zhou, Ji Liu, Wenxiang Yang, Yanhua Zheng, Jingjing Qu, Xiaoqiao Tang, Hong Bai, Chunxia Liu, Bolin Fan
{"title":"Evidence of non-carcinogenicity of rhubarb extract: a 2-year feeding study in SD rats.","authors":"Liwen Zhou, Ji Liu, Wenxiang Yang, Yanhua Zheng, Jingjing Qu, Xiaoqiao Tang, Hong Bai, Chunxia Liu, Bolin Fan","doi":"10.1080/01480545.2025.2536525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the carcinogenicity and determined the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of rhubarb extract in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats over two years.SD rats (104 per group, equal males/females) were randomly assigned to a control (0 mg/kg BW) and three treatment groups (101, 405, and 1620 mg/kg BW). The extract was administered via diet for 104 weeks. Body weight, food consumption, urinalysis, hematology, organ-to-body weight ratios, and histopathology were analyzed. The 1620 mg/kg group showed significantly lower weight gain. Urinalysis revealed elevated ketones, nitrites, and reduced pH in1620 mg/kg BW group. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased in 1620 mg/kg BW dose group of females, and blood glucose rose in 1620 mg/kg BW dose group of males. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was prolonged at 405 and 1620 mg/kg. Significant tubular pigment deposition was observed in kidneys at 405 and 1620 mg/kg, but no significant differences in tumor incidence were noted. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for rhubarb extract was 101 mg/kg BW, while the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) was 405 mg/kg BW. The liver and kidneys were primary toxicity targets. Rhubarb extract exhibited no carcinogenic potential in SD rats.</p>","PeriodicalId":11333,"journal":{"name":"Drug and Chemical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2025.2536525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated the carcinogenicity and determined the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of rhubarb extract in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats over two years.SD rats (104 per group, equal males/females) were randomly assigned to a control (0 mg/kg BW) and three treatment groups (101, 405, and 1620 mg/kg BW). The extract was administered via diet for 104 weeks. Body weight, food consumption, urinalysis, hematology, organ-to-body weight ratios, and histopathology were analyzed. The 1620 mg/kg group showed significantly lower weight gain. Urinalysis revealed elevated ketones, nitrites, and reduced pH in1620 mg/kg BW group. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased in 1620 mg/kg BW dose group of females, and blood glucose rose in 1620 mg/kg BW dose group of males. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was prolonged at 405 and 1620 mg/kg. Significant tubular pigment deposition was observed in kidneys at 405 and 1620 mg/kg, but no significant differences in tumor incidence were noted. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for rhubarb extract was 101 mg/kg BW, while the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) was 405 mg/kg BW. The liver and kidneys were primary toxicity targets. Rhubarb extract exhibited no carcinogenic potential in SD rats.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Chemical Toxicology publishes full-length research papers, review articles and short communications that encompass a broad spectrum of toxicological data surrounding risk assessment and harmful exposure. Manuscripts are considered according to their relevance to the journal.
Topics include both descriptive and mechanics research that illustrates the risk assessment implications of exposure to toxic agents. Examples of suitable topics include toxicological studies, which are structural examinations on the effects of dose, metabolism, and statistical or mechanism-based approaches to risk assessment. New findings and methods, along with safety evaluations, are also acceptable. Special issues may be reserved to publish symposium summaries, reviews in toxicology, and overviews of the practical interpretation and application of toxicological data.