The impact of a quality assurance program on skeletal survey imaging for suspected non-accidental injury.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jacques Bence, Martin Kidd, Richard D Pitcher
{"title":"The impact of a quality assurance program on skeletal survey imaging for suspected non-accidental injury.","authors":"Jacques Bence, Martin Kidd, Richard D Pitcher","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa has one of the highest rates of child abuse. The skeletal survey (SS) is the radiological investigation for suspected paediatric non-accidental injury (NAI). Institutional policy is to perform the SS in accordance with The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) 2017 guidelines. However, the SS is technically challenging, requiring several views with meticulous attention to radiographic detail. The optimal study is thus not always achieved, resulting in decreased diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1. Assess pre-intervention (Institution name) compliance with RCR 2017 SS guidelines for suspected NAI. 2. Assess post-intervention (Institution name) compliance with RCR 2017 SS guidelines for suspected NAI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective assessment of institutional percentage compliance with RCR 2017 SS guidelines for suspected paediatric NAI was followed by a 12-month educational intervention. Pre- and post-intervention compliance was compared utilizing the chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage compliance with standard RCR 2017 SS views in the post intervention period (mean 21.6/25, 86%) was significantly (p < 0.01) higher than the pre intervention period (mean 9/25, 36%). The most significant improvements were in the coned lateral joint and oblique chest views.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a simple institutional quality assurance program has the potential to improve imaging for NAI victims. The program described is broadly applicable to any healthcare or institutional setting.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study, based on the RCR 2017 guidelines, forms part of a very small body of work on non-accidental injury quality assurance and is the only such analysis from the African continent.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: South Africa has one of the highest rates of child abuse. The skeletal survey (SS) is the radiological investigation for suspected paediatric non-accidental injury (NAI). Institutional policy is to perform the SS in accordance with The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) 2017 guidelines. However, the SS is technically challenging, requiring several views with meticulous attention to radiographic detail. The optimal study is thus not always achieved, resulting in decreased diagnostic accuracy.

Objectives: 1. Assess pre-intervention (Institution name) compliance with RCR 2017 SS guidelines for suspected NAI. 2. Assess post-intervention (Institution name) compliance with RCR 2017 SS guidelines for suspected NAI.

Method: A retrospective assessment of institutional percentage compliance with RCR 2017 SS guidelines for suspected paediatric NAI was followed by a 12-month educational intervention. Pre- and post-intervention compliance was compared utilizing the chi-square test.

Results: The percentage compliance with standard RCR 2017 SS views in the post intervention period (mean 21.6/25, 86%) was significantly (p < 0.01) higher than the pre intervention period (mean 9/25, 36%). The most significant improvements were in the coned lateral joint and oblique chest views.

Conclusion: The implementation of a simple institutional quality assurance program has the potential to improve imaging for NAI victims. The program described is broadly applicable to any healthcare or institutional setting.

Advances in knowledge: This study, based on the RCR 2017 guidelines, forms part of a very small body of work on non-accidental injury quality assurance and is the only such analysis from the African continent.

质量保证程序对疑似非意外伤害的骨骼调查成像的影响。
背景:南非是儿童虐待率最高的国家之一。骨骼调查(SS)是放射学调查疑似儿科非意外伤害(NAI)。机构政策是按照皇家放射科医师学院(RCR) 2017年指南执行SS。然而,SS在技术上具有挑战性,需要几个视图,并对放射摄影细节进行细致的关注。因此,最佳研究并不总是实现,导致诊断准确性下降。目的:1。评估干预前(机构名称)是否符合疑似NAI的RCR 2017 SS指南。2. 评估干预后(机构名称)对疑似NAI的RCR 2017 SS指南的遵守情况。方法:回顾性评估疑似儿科NAI的机构遵守RCR 2017 SS指南的百分比,然后进行12个月的教育干预。采用卡方检验比较干预前后依从性。结果:干预后依从标准RCR 2017 SS视图的百分比(平均21.6/ 25,86%)显着(p)。结论:实施简单的机构质量保证计划有可能改善NAI受害者的成像。所描述的程序广泛适用于任何医疗保健或机构设置。知识进展:该研究基于RCR 2017指南,是关于非意外伤害质量保证的一小部分工作的一部分,也是非洲大陆唯一的此类分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信