Measurement of Eco-Anxiety in the Chinese Context: Development and Validation of a New Eco-Anxiety Scale Based on the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dawei Wang, Ziying Lu, Muze Li, Linrui Zhang, Hang Yu, Luyao Tan, Wenxu Mao, Xiuqing Qiao, Ting An, Yixin Hu
{"title":"Measurement of Eco-Anxiety in the Chinese Context: Development and Validation of a New Eco-Anxiety Scale Based on the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale.","authors":"Dawei Wang, Ziying Lu, Muze Li, Linrui Zhang, Hang Yu, Luyao Tan, Wenxu Mao, Xiuqing Qiao, Ting An, Yixin Hu","doi":"10.3390/bs15070985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the increasing complexity of ecological and environmental problems, eco-anxiety is increasingly recognized as an essential problem in China. Despite its prevalence, there is a lack of valid measurements in China. The purpose of the present study was to expand the Hogg Eco-anxiety Scale (HEAS) under the Chinese context and evaluate the psychometric attributes of the expanded scale. Specifically, a qualitative study was conducted in Study 1 (<i>n</i> = 17) to expand the HEAS in the Chinese context. Exploratory factor analysis in Study 2 (<i>n</i> = 297) and confirmatory factor analysis in Study 3 (<i>n</i> = 374) were conducted to validate the scale. The climate change anxiety scale and pro-environmental behavior scale were used to assess criterion-related validity in Study 4 (<i>n</i> = 305). Results indicated that a new eco-anxiety scale (i.e., EAS-20) including 20 items attributed to four dimension (somatic symptoms, affective symptoms, rumination, and behavioral symptoms) was developed. It showed satisfactory psychometric properties, including high internal consistency (α = 0.97) and a four-factor structure explaining 84.36% of the variance. The criterion-related validity was acceptable (0.25 ≤ <i>r</i> ≤ 0.37). The article concludes that the 20-item Eco-Anxiety Scale (EAS-20) has good psychometric properties and can be applied to measure eco-anxiety in the Chinese adult population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12292478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing complexity of ecological and environmental problems, eco-anxiety is increasingly recognized as an essential problem in China. Despite its prevalence, there is a lack of valid measurements in China. The purpose of the present study was to expand the Hogg Eco-anxiety Scale (HEAS) under the Chinese context and evaluate the psychometric attributes of the expanded scale. Specifically, a qualitative study was conducted in Study 1 (n = 17) to expand the HEAS in the Chinese context. Exploratory factor analysis in Study 2 (n = 297) and confirmatory factor analysis in Study 3 (n = 374) were conducted to validate the scale. The climate change anxiety scale and pro-environmental behavior scale were used to assess criterion-related validity in Study 4 (n = 305). Results indicated that a new eco-anxiety scale (i.e., EAS-20) including 20 items attributed to four dimension (somatic symptoms, affective symptoms, rumination, and behavioral symptoms) was developed. It showed satisfactory psychometric properties, including high internal consistency (α = 0.97) and a four-factor structure explaining 84.36% of the variance. The criterion-related validity was acceptable (0.25 ≤ r ≤ 0.37). The article concludes that the 20-item Eco-Anxiety Scale (EAS-20) has good psychometric properties and can be applied to measure eco-anxiety in the Chinese adult population.

中国环境下生态焦虑的测量:基于霍格生态焦虑量表的新生态焦虑量表的开发与验证。
随着生态环境问题的日益复杂,生态焦虑越来越被认为是中国的一个重要问题。尽管它很普遍,但在中国缺乏有效的测量方法。本研究的目的是在中国背景下扩充霍格生态焦虑量表(HEAS),并评价扩充后的量表的心理测量属性。具体而言,在研究1 (n = 17)中进行了定性研究,以扩展中国背景下的高等教育服务。研究2进行探索性因子分析(n = 297),研究3进行验证性因子分析(n = 374)对量表进行验证。研究4采用气候变化焦虑量表和亲环境行为量表评估标准相关效度(n = 305)。结果表明,编制了一份新的生态焦虑量表(即eas20),其中包括躯体症状、情感症状、反刍和行为症状四个维度的20个项目。它显示了令人满意的心理测量特性,包括高内部一致性(α = 0.97)和四因素结构,解释了84.36%的方差。标准相关效度可接受(0.25≤r≤0.37)。本文认为,20项生态焦虑量表(eas20)具有良好的心理测量性能,可用于测量中国成年人的生态焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信