Bayesian sample size determination for longitudinal intervention studies with linear and log-linear growth.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Ulrich Lösener, Mirjam Moerbeek
{"title":"Bayesian sample size determination for longitudinal intervention studies with linear and log-linear growth.","authors":"Ulrich Lösener, Mirjam Moerbeek","doi":"10.3758/s13428-025-02749-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A priori sample size determination (SSD) is essential for designing cost-efficient trials and in avoiding underpowered studies. In addition, reporting a solid justification for a certain sample size is required by most ethics committees and many funding agencies. Often, SSD is based on null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), an approach that has received severe criticism in the past decades. As an alternative, Bayesian hypothesis evaluation using Bayes factors has been developed. Bayes factors quantify the relative support in the data for a pair of competing hypotheses without suffering from some of the drawbacks of NHST. SSD for Bayesian hypothesis testing relies on simulations and has only been studied recently. Available software for this is limited to simple models such as ANOVA and the t test, in which observations are assumed to be independent from each other. However, this assumption is rendered untenable in longitudinal experiments where observations are nested within individuals. In that case, a multilevel model should be used. This paper provides researchers with a valuable tool for performing SSD for multilevel models with longitudinal data in a Bayesian framework, along with the necessary theoretical background and concrete empirical examples. The open-source R function that enables researchers to tailor the simulation to their trial at hand can be found on the GitHub page of the first author.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 9","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02749-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A priori sample size determination (SSD) is essential for designing cost-efficient trials and in avoiding underpowered studies. In addition, reporting a solid justification for a certain sample size is required by most ethics committees and many funding agencies. Often, SSD is based on null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), an approach that has received severe criticism in the past decades. As an alternative, Bayesian hypothesis evaluation using Bayes factors has been developed. Bayes factors quantify the relative support in the data for a pair of competing hypotheses without suffering from some of the drawbacks of NHST. SSD for Bayesian hypothesis testing relies on simulations and has only been studied recently. Available software for this is limited to simple models such as ANOVA and the t test, in which observations are assumed to be independent from each other. However, this assumption is rendered untenable in longitudinal experiments where observations are nested within individuals. In that case, a multilevel model should be used. This paper provides researchers with a valuable tool for performing SSD for multilevel models with longitudinal data in a Bayesian framework, along with the necessary theoretical background and concrete empirical examples. The open-source R function that enables researchers to tailor the simulation to their trial at hand can be found on the GitHub page of the first author.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

线性和对数线性增长纵向干预研究的贝叶斯样本量确定。
先验样本量测定(SSD)对于设计具有成本效益的试验和避免研究不足是必不可少的。此外,大多数伦理委员会和许多资助机构都要求报告一定样本量的可靠理由。通常,SSD是基于零假设显著性检验(NHST),这种方法在过去几十年中受到了严厉的批评。作为一种替代方法,使用贝叶斯因子的贝叶斯假设评估已经发展起来。贝叶斯因子量化了数据中对一对相互竞争的假设的相对支持度,而没有NHST的一些缺点。用于贝叶斯假设检验的SSD依赖于模拟,最近才被研究。可用的软件仅限于简单的模型,如方差分析和t检验,其中假设观察结果彼此独立。然而,这种假设在纵向实验中是站不住脚的,因为观察是嵌套在个体内部的。在这种情况下,应该使用多层模型。本文为研究人员在贝叶斯框架下对纵向数据的多层模型进行SSD提供了一个有价值的工具,并提供了必要的理论背景和具体的经验例子。开源R函数使研究人员能够根据手头的试验定制模拟,可以在第一作者的GitHub页面上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信