Adverse reactions of rush subcutaneous immunotherapy using standardized house dust mite allergen extract and its prediction model construction and analysis.

IF 2.1 Q3 ALLERGY
Asia Pacific Allergy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000181
Renke Mo, Xiaonan Song, Mo Xian, Wanjun Wang, Xu Shi, Wanyi Fu, Jing Li, Nan Jia
{"title":"Adverse reactions of rush subcutaneous immunotherapy using standardized house dust mite allergen extract and its prediction model construction and analysis.","authors":"Renke Mo, Xiaonan Song, Mo Xian, Wanjun Wang, Xu Shi, Wanyi Fu, Jing Li, Nan Jia","doi":"10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergic diseases are a growing health concern, with house dust mites being a prevalent allergen linked to various allergies. Rush subcutaneous immunotherapy (RIT) achieves maintenance dose rapidly but carries higher risks than conventional immunotherapy (CIT). The combination of Omalizumab with allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has been shown to improve AIT safety. This study investigates the safety of RIT combined with anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) pretreatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis compared patients with allergic rhinitis and/or allergic asthma sensitive to dust mites who underwent RIT with anti-IgE pretreatment versus CIT at our facility from July 2022 to January 2024. We collected and analyzed demographic data, adverse events, and baseline metrics including visual analog scale scores, daily medication scores, allergic blood test outcomes, and lung function parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study enrolled 50 patients in the RIT group and 60 in the CIT group. The RIT group demonstrated superior safety, with significantly fewer local adverse reactions during the up-dosing phase compared with CIT (<i>P</i> < 0.01). While systemic reactions were analogous between groups, the RIT group had a lower incidence of respiratory symptoms (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis established a predictive model for systemic reactions during up-dosing phase, with receiver operating characteristic analysis indicating its predictive accuracy exceeded that of individual factors (area under the curve = 0.815).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RIT combined with anti-IgE pretreatment demonstrated low systemic adverse reaction rates and high safety. A combined visual analogue scale scores (VASs) and maximal mid-expiratory flow at 25%-75% prediction model was more accurate in forecasting systemic reactions than individual factor. Further research is required to determine its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":8488,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Allergy","volume":"15 2","pages":"89-98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allergic diseases are a growing health concern, with house dust mites being a prevalent allergen linked to various allergies. Rush subcutaneous immunotherapy (RIT) achieves maintenance dose rapidly but carries higher risks than conventional immunotherapy (CIT). The combination of Omalizumab with allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has been shown to improve AIT safety. This study investigates the safety of RIT combined with anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) pretreatment.

Methods: This retrospective analysis compared patients with allergic rhinitis and/or allergic asthma sensitive to dust mites who underwent RIT with anti-IgE pretreatment versus CIT at our facility from July 2022 to January 2024. We collected and analyzed demographic data, adverse events, and baseline metrics including visual analog scale scores, daily medication scores, allergic blood test outcomes, and lung function parameters.

Results: Our study enrolled 50 patients in the RIT group and 60 in the CIT group. The RIT group demonstrated superior safety, with significantly fewer local adverse reactions during the up-dosing phase compared with CIT (P < 0.01). While systemic reactions were analogous between groups, the RIT group had a lower incidence of respiratory symptoms (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis established a predictive model for systemic reactions during up-dosing phase, with receiver operating characteristic analysis indicating its predictive accuracy exceeded that of individual factors (area under the curve = 0.815).

Conclusion: RIT combined with anti-IgE pretreatment demonstrated low systemic adverse reaction rates and high safety. A combined visual analogue scale scores (VASs) and maximal mid-expiratory flow at 25%-75% prediction model was more accurate in forecasting systemic reactions than individual factor. Further research is required to determine its clinical utility.

Abstract Image

标准化屋尘螨过敏原提取物皮下免疫治疗的不良反应及预测模型的构建与分析。
背景:过敏性疾病是一个日益增长的健康问题,与屋尘螨是一个普遍的过敏原与各种过敏。Rush皮下免疫治疗(RIT)快速达到维持剂量,但与常规免疫治疗(CIT)相比风险更高。Omalizumab与过敏原免疫疗法(AIT)的联合应用已被证明可提高AIT的安全性。本研究探讨RIT联合抗免疫球蛋白E (IgE)预处理的安全性。方法:本回顾性分析比较了2022年7月至2024年1月在我们医院接受抗ige预处理的RIT和CIT治疗的变应性鼻炎和/或对尘螨敏感的过敏性哮喘患者。我们收集并分析了人口统计数据、不良事件和基线指标,包括视觉模拟量表评分、每日用药评分、过敏血检结果和肺功能参数。结果:我们的研究纳入了50例RIT组患者和60例CIT组患者。RIT组表现出更好的安全性,与CIT组相比,RIT组在给药期的局部不良反应明显减少(P < 0.01)。两组间全身反应相似,RIT组呼吸道症状发生率较低(P < 0.05)。Logistic回归分析建立了上给药期全身反应的预测模型,经受试者工作特征分析,预测精度高于个体因素(曲线下面积= 0.815)。结论:RIT联合抗ige预处理系统不良反应发生率低,安全性高。结合视觉模拟量表评分(VASs)和最大呼气中流量(25%-75%)预测模型对全身反应的预测比个体因素更准确。需要进一步的研究来确定其临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Allergy (AP Allergy) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). Although the primary aim of the journal is to promote communication between Asia Pacific scientists who are interested in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology including immunodeficiency, the journal is intended to be available worldwide. To enable scientists and clinicians from emerging societies appreciate the scope and intent of the journal, early issues will contain more educational review material. For better communication and understanding, it will include rational concepts related to the diagnosis and management of asthma and other immunological conditions. Over time, the journal will increase the number of original research papers to become the foremost citation journal for allergy and clinical immunology information of the Asia Pacific in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信