Comparative outcomes of oophoropexy techniques in preventing recurrent adnexal torsion.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yael Yagur, Amit Klein, Lisa Tiosano, Omer Weitzner, Yair Daykan, David Rosen, Zvi Klein, Ron Schonman
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of oophoropexy techniques in preventing recurrent adnexal torsion.","authors":"Yael Yagur, Amit Klein, Lisa Tiosano, Omer Weitzner, Yair Daykan, David Rosen, Zvi Klein, Ron Schonman","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08128-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of ovarian ligament plication and ovario-round ligament fixation (\"hot-dog\" technique) in preventing recurrent adnexal torsion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study performed in the gynecology department, of a university-affiliated tertiary medical center. Women of reproductive age who underwent first fixation following adnexal torsion surgery on the ipsilateral side between 2014 and 2023. The study included a homogenous population with normal ovarian size. Primary outcome was the recurrence rate of adnexal torsion following each fixation technique. Two fixation techniques of ovarian ligament plication and ovario-round ligament fixation were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 525 adnexal torsion events were reviewed, involving 413 patients. After applying strict inclusion criteria, 38 patients who underwent their first fixation on the ipsilateral side were included in the final analysis. Among them, 27 (71%) underwent ovarian ligament plication, and 11 (29%) underwent ovario-round ligament fixation. Recurrent torsion occurred in 25.9% (7 of 27) of patients in the ovarian ligament plication group, while no recurrences were observed in the ovario-round ligament fixation group. While clinically promising, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). Fixation was also safely performed during pregnancy, primarily in the first trimester, with no postoperative complications observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ovario-round ligament fixation shows promise as a technique for preventing recurrent torsion with a favorable safety profile. Due to the limited sample size, further larger-scale studies are required to confirm these findings and comprehensively evaluate long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08128-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of ovarian ligament plication and ovario-round ligament fixation ("hot-dog" technique) in preventing recurrent adnexal torsion.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study performed in the gynecology department, of a university-affiliated tertiary medical center. Women of reproductive age who underwent first fixation following adnexal torsion surgery on the ipsilateral side between 2014 and 2023. The study included a homogenous population with normal ovarian size. Primary outcome was the recurrence rate of adnexal torsion following each fixation technique. Two fixation techniques of ovarian ligament plication and ovario-round ligament fixation were compared.

Results: A total of 525 adnexal torsion events were reviewed, involving 413 patients. After applying strict inclusion criteria, 38 patients who underwent their first fixation on the ipsilateral side were included in the final analysis. Among them, 27 (71%) underwent ovarian ligament plication, and 11 (29%) underwent ovario-round ligament fixation. Recurrent torsion occurred in 25.9% (7 of 27) of patients in the ovarian ligament plication group, while no recurrences were observed in the ovario-round ligament fixation group. While clinically promising, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). Fixation was also safely performed during pregnancy, primarily in the first trimester, with no postoperative complications observed.

Conclusions: Ovario-round ligament fixation shows promise as a technique for preventing recurrent torsion with a favorable safety profile. Due to the limited sample size, further larger-scale studies are required to confirm these findings and comprehensively evaluate long-term outcomes.

卵巢固定术预防复发性附件扭转的比较结果。
目的:比较卵巢韧带应用与卵巢圆韧带固定(“热狗”技术)预防复发性附件扭转的效果。方法:这是一项在大学附属三级医疗中心妇科进行的回顾性队列研究。2014年至2023年间同侧附件扭转手术后首次固定的育龄女性。该研究纳入了卵巢大小正常的同质人群。主要观察指标为每一种固定技术后附件扭转的复发率。比较了卵巢韧带应用和卵巢圆韧带固定两种固定方法。结果:共回顾了525例附件扭转事件,涉及413例患者。在应用严格的纳入标准后,38例首次同侧固定的患者被纳入最终分析。其中卵巢韧带应用27例(71%),卵巢圆形韧带固定11例(29%)。应用卵巢韧带组有25.9%(27例中有7例)患者出现扭转复发,而卵巢圆形韧带固定组无复发。虽然临床有希望,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.08)。在妊娠期间,主要是在妊娠早期,固定也是安全的,没有观察到术后并发症。结论:卵巢圆形韧带固定作为预防复发性扭转的技术具有良好的安全性。由于样本量有限,需要进一步进行更大规模的研究来证实这些发现并全面评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信