Agreement Between Emergency Department Admission and Hospital Discharge Diagnoses; A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 2 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2597
Arif Ishtiq Mattoo, Saad Al-Shahrani, Farhat Anjum Mattoo, Saad Al-Asiri, Amjad Obeid, Donnie Neil Sarmiento, Qasem Ahmed Almulihi, Abdullah Saad Al-Shahrani
{"title":"Agreement Between Emergency Department Admission and Hospital Discharge Diagnoses; A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Arif Ishtiq Mattoo, Saad Al-Shahrani, Farhat Anjum Mattoo, Saad Al-Asiri, Amjad Obeid, Donnie Neil Sarmiento, Qasem Ahmed Almulihi, Abdullah Saad Al-Shahrani","doi":"10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An accurate emergency department (ED) diagnosis is critically important for providing proper treatment during the so-called \"Golden Hour.\" This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between admitting and discharge diagnoses in ED.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted over the course of 6 months in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care center. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the agreement between admission and hospital discharge diagnoses. The patients were categorized into two groups based on whether the admitting and discharge diagnoses were matched or mismatched. The reasons for diagnostic discrepancies, as well as their impact on patient outcomes, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6812 cases with mean age of 43.2 ± 17.9 (range: 1-95 years) years were included (59.30% male). The admitting and discharge diagnoses were matched in 5585 (81.99%) cases and mismatched in 1227 (18.01%) cases (7.2% were completely unmatched). The proportion of mismatched diagnoses did not differ significantly between males and females (p = 0.0977). Mismatched diagnoses were significantly more common in 0-15 years age group (37.86%), and the lowest proportion was seen in patients aged 15-65 years (9.65%) (p < 0.001). The most frequent reason for diagnostic discrepancy was \"writing chronic disease as discharge diagnosis (relabeling),\" (37.08%). Other contributing factors included radiological tests after hospital admission (20.37%), physical examination findings (18.1%), additional laboratory tests (15.81%), and other causes (8.57%). A change in diagnosis impacted the clinical outcomes of 103 (8.39%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnostic agreement between ED and discharge diagnoses was observed in 81.99% of cases, with a 7.2% complete mismatch rate. The most frequent causes were discharge relabeling and delayed investigations. These discrepancies had measurable impacts on management, hospital stay, and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An accurate emergency department (ED) diagnosis is critically important for providing proper treatment during the so-called "Golden Hour." This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between admitting and discharge diagnoses in ED.

Method: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted over the course of 6 months in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care center. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the agreement between admission and hospital discharge diagnoses. The patients were categorized into two groups based on whether the admitting and discharge diagnoses were matched or mismatched. The reasons for diagnostic discrepancies, as well as their impact on patient outcomes, were assessed.

Results: A total of 6812 cases with mean age of 43.2 ± 17.9 (range: 1-95 years) years were included (59.30% male). The admitting and discharge diagnoses were matched in 5585 (81.99%) cases and mismatched in 1227 (18.01%) cases (7.2% were completely unmatched). The proportion of mismatched diagnoses did not differ significantly between males and females (p = 0.0977). Mismatched diagnoses were significantly more common in 0-15 years age group (37.86%), and the lowest proportion was seen in patients aged 15-65 years (9.65%) (p < 0.001). The most frequent reason for diagnostic discrepancy was "writing chronic disease as discharge diagnosis (relabeling)," (37.08%). Other contributing factors included radiological tests after hospital admission (20.37%), physical examination findings (18.1%), additional laboratory tests (15.81%), and other causes (8.57%). A change in diagnosis impacted the clinical outcomes of 103 (8.39%) patients.

Conclusion: Diagnostic agreement between ED and discharge diagnoses was observed in 81.99% of cases, with a 7.2% complete mismatch rate. The most frequent causes were discharge relabeling and delayed investigations. These discrepancies had measurable impacts on management, hospital stay, and mortality.

急诊入院与出院诊断的一致性研究回顾性观察性研究。
简介:在所谓的“黄金时间”,准确的急诊诊断对于提供适当的治疗至关重要。本研究旨在评估急诊科(ED)入院和出院诊断之间的一致性。方法:本回顾性横断面研究在一家三级保健中心的急诊科(ED)进行了6个月的研究。本研究的主要目的是评估入院和出院诊断之间的一致性。根据入院和出院诊断是否匹配或不匹配将患者分为两组。评估了诊断差异的原因及其对患者预后的影响。结果:共纳入6812例,平均年龄(43.2±17.9)岁,年龄范围:1 ~ 95岁,其中男性占59.30%。入院出院诊断相匹配5585例(81.99%),不匹配1227例(18.01%),完全不匹配7.2%。不匹配诊断的比例在男女之间无显著差异(p = 0.0977)。错配诊断在0 ~ 15岁年龄组中发生率最高(37.86%),15 ~ 65岁年龄组比例最低(9.65%)(p < 0.001)。诊断不一致最常见的原因是“出院诊断写慢性病(重标)”,占37.08%。其他影响因素包括入院后放射检查(20.37%)、体检结果(18.1%)、额外实验室检查(15.81%)和其他原因(8.57%)。诊断改变影响103例(8.39%)患者的临床结局。结论:急诊诊断与出院诊断的符合率为81.99%,完全不匹配率为7.2%。最常见的原因是出院重新标记和延迟调查。这些差异对管理、住院时间和死亡率有可测量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信