Forced-rate aerobic cycling improves locomotor function and gait biomechanics in individuals with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Susan M Linder, Ryan Rilinger, Ken Learman, Mandy Miller Koop, Matt Streicher, Sara Davidson, Courtney Miller, Donayja Harris, Patrick Corrigan, Francois Bethoux, Jay L Alberts
{"title":"Forced-rate aerobic cycling improves locomotor function and gait biomechanics in individuals with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Susan M Linder, Ryan Rilinger, Ken Learman, Mandy Miller Koop, Matt Streicher, Sara Davidson, Courtney Miller, Donayja Harris, Patrick Corrigan, Francois Bethoux, Jay L Alberts","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While cycling and walking are different motor tasks, both require the rapid reciprocal activation and relaxation of lower extremity muscles in a synergistic manner, promoting coordination patterns similar to walking. The aim of this secondary analysis was to examine the effects of forced-rate cycling on gait biomechanics post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted investigating the neuroplastic effects of forced-rate cycling on upper extremity motor recovery in individuals (n = 60) post-stroke. In this secondary analysis, a subset of participants (n = 45) completed biomechanical gait assessment at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gait velocity increased in the cycling group by 0.08 m/s and in the control group by 0.02 m/s, though a group difference was not observed (p = 0.195). Walking capacity (6-minute walk test) significantly improved by 53.3 m for the cycling group versus 15.6 m for the control group (p = 0.0036). Improvements in spatiotemporal characteristics in the cycling group included increased step length, cadence, and time spent in single-limb support, in addition to paretic limb kinetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improvements in gait velocity following forced-rate cycling were accompanied by normalization of gait biomechanics rather than exaggerated compensatory strategies, supporting the use of aerobic cycling as a viable and safe intervention to improve locomotor control post-stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While cycling and walking are different motor tasks, both require the rapid reciprocal activation and relaxation of lower extremity muscles in a synergistic manner, promoting coordination patterns similar to walking. The aim of this secondary analysis was to examine the effects of forced-rate cycling on gait biomechanics post-stroke.

Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted investigating the neuroplastic effects of forced-rate cycling on upper extremity motor recovery in individuals (n = 60) post-stroke. In this secondary analysis, a subset of participants (n = 45) completed biomechanical gait assessment at baseline and post-intervention.

Results: Gait velocity increased in the cycling group by 0.08 m/s and in the control group by 0.02 m/s, though a group difference was not observed (p = 0.195). Walking capacity (6-minute walk test) significantly improved by 53.3 m for the cycling group versus 15.6 m for the control group (p = 0.0036). Improvements in spatiotemporal characteristics in the cycling group included increased step length, cadence, and time spent in single-limb support, in addition to paretic limb kinetics.

Conclusion: Improvements in gait velocity following forced-rate cycling were accompanied by normalization of gait biomechanics rather than exaggerated compensatory strategies, supporting the use of aerobic cycling as a viable and safe intervention to improve locomotor control post-stroke.

强制速率有氧循环改善慢性中风患者的运动功能和步态生物力学:一项随机对照试验。
目的:虽然骑车和步行是不同的运动任务,但两者都需要下肢肌肉以协同的方式快速相互激活和放松,促进类似步行的协调模式。这一次要分析的目的是检查强制速率骑车对中风后步态生物力学的影响。设计:进行一项随机对照试验,研究脑卒中后强制速率骑行对上肢运动恢复的神经可塑性影响(n = 60)。在这一次要分析中,一部分参与者(n = 45)在基线和干预后完成了生物力学步态评估。结果:骑车组步态速度提高0.08 m/s,对照组步态速度提高0.02 m/s,但组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.195)。步行能力(6分钟步行测试),骑车组显著提高53.3米,对照组提高15.6米(p = 0.0036)。骑车组的时空特征的改善包括步长、节奏和单肢支持时间的增加,以及双亲肢体动力学的改善。结论:强制速率骑行后步态速度的改善伴随着步态生物力学的正常化,而不是夸张的代偿策略,支持有氧骑行作为一种可行且安全的干预措施来改善卒中后运动控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信