Isometric or Isotonic Exercises in Alleviating Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain and Enhancing Quality of Life Among Computer Users with Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-13 eCollection Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.5812/aapm-160771
Arash Khaledi, Hooman Minoonejad
{"title":"Isometric or Isotonic Exercises in Alleviating Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain and Enhancing Quality of Life Among Computer Users with Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Arash Khaledi, Hooman Minoonejad","doi":"10.5812/aapm-160771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Millions of computer users experience chronic neck and shoulder pain (CNSP) and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to upper cross syndrome (UCS). While strengthening exercises for the posterior trunk alleviate symptoms, it remains unclear whether isometric or isotonic exercises are more effective.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of isometric and isotonic exercises on CNSP and HRQoL in individuals with UCS, and to evaluate these outcomes against a non-intervention group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial (RCT), 43 UCS patients with CNSP were divided into three groups: Isometric exercises (n = 15), isotonic exercises (n = 14), and a control group (n = 14). Over 8 weeks, exercise groups completed 3 sessions per week (40 - 60 minutes each). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and HRQoL was assessed using the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) questionnaire, both pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both isometric and isotonic exercises significantly reduced CNSP and improved HRQoL compared to the control group. Isometric exercises yielded a 70.4% pain reduction (P < 0.001) and a 14.9% HRQoL improvement (P = 0.002), while isotonic training showed a 47.6% pain reduction (P = 0.001) and a 17.7% HRQoL improvement (P < 0.001). Between-group differences were not statistically significant (pain: P = 0.853; HRQoL: P = 0.999). Although isometric exercises slightly favored pain reduction and isotonic exercises showed marginal HRQoL gains, these differences should not be overstated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both isometric and isotonic exercises improved CNSP and HRQoL in UCS patients, with no significant difference between them. Slight trends favoring each should be interpreted cautiously. Longer-term studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":"e160771"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12297035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-160771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Millions of computer users experience chronic neck and shoulder pain (CNSP) and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to upper cross syndrome (UCS). While strengthening exercises for the posterior trunk alleviate symptoms, it remains unclear whether isometric or isotonic exercises are more effective.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of isometric and isotonic exercises on CNSP and HRQoL in individuals with UCS, and to evaluate these outcomes against a non-intervention group.

Methods: In this randomized clinical trial (RCT), 43 UCS patients with CNSP were divided into three groups: Isometric exercises (n = 15), isotonic exercises (n = 14), and a control group (n = 14). Over 8 weeks, exercise groups completed 3 sessions per week (40 - 60 minutes each). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and HRQoL was assessed using the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) questionnaire, both pre- and post-intervention.

Results: Both isometric and isotonic exercises significantly reduced CNSP and improved HRQoL compared to the control group. Isometric exercises yielded a 70.4% pain reduction (P < 0.001) and a 14.9% HRQoL improvement (P = 0.002), while isotonic training showed a 47.6% pain reduction (P = 0.001) and a 17.7% HRQoL improvement (P < 0.001). Between-group differences were not statistically significant (pain: P = 0.853; HRQoL: P = 0.999). Although isometric exercises slightly favored pain reduction and isotonic exercises showed marginal HRQoL gains, these differences should not be overstated.

Conclusions: Both isometric and isotonic exercises improved CNSP and HRQoL in UCS patients, with no significant difference between them. Slight trends favoring each should be interpreted cautiously. Longer-term studies are warranted.

等长或等张运动在缓解慢性颈肩疼痛和提高生活质量的电脑用户与上交叉综合征:一项随机对照试验。
背景:数以百万计的计算机用户由于上交叉综合征(UCS)而经历慢性颈肩痛(CNSP)和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)下降。虽然后干强化训练可减轻症状,但尚不清楚是等距运动更有效还是等张运动更有效。目的:本研究旨在比较等长运动和等张运动对UCS患者CNSP和HRQoL的影响,并与非干预组比较这些结果。方法:本随机临床试验(RCT)将43例UCS合并CNSP患者分为3组:等张力运动组(n = 15)、等张力运动组(n = 14)和对照组(n = 14)。在8周的时间里,锻炼组每周完成3次锻炼(每次40 - 60分钟)。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛,采用36项健康问卷(SF-36)评估HRQoL,包括干预前后。结果:与对照组相比,等长和等张运动均可显著降低CNSP,改善HRQoL。等张力训练疼痛减轻70.4% (P < 0.001), HRQoL改善14.9% (P = 0.002),而等张力训练疼痛减轻47.6% (P = 0.001), HRQoL改善17.7% (P < 0.001)。组间差异无统计学意义(疼痛:P = 0.853;HRQoL: P = 0.999)。虽然等长运动稍微有利于减轻疼痛,而等张力运动显示HRQoL的边际增益,但这些差异不应被夸大。结论:等长运动和等张运动均可改善UCS患者的CNSP和HRQoL,两者之间无显著差异。对于有利于双方的轻微趋势,应谨慎解读。长期研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信