Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Retro-laminar Block on Postoperative Pain Following Upper Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.5812/aapm-158242
Poupak Rahimzadeh, Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz, Mahmood-Reza Alebouyeh, Faranak Rokhtabnak, Reza Farahmand Rad, Shima Movaseghi
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Retro-laminar Block on Postoperative Pain Following Upper Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery.","authors":"Poupak Rahimzadeh, Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz, Mahmood-Reza Alebouyeh, Faranak Rokhtabnak, Reza Farahmand Rad, Shima Movaseghi","doi":"10.5812/aapm-158242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgeries, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, can be severe. Despite various analgesic methods, high doses of narcotics are often required, leading to complications such as dizziness, respiratory disorders, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of two novel analgesic methods, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and the retrolaminar block (RLB), performed under ultrasound guidance, in managing pain after upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this clinical trial, candidates for elective upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries were randomly assigned to two groups (40 patients in the ESPB group and 40 in the RLB group). To manage preoperative pain, one group received an ESPB block under ultrasound guidance on the surgical side, while the other group received a RLB. Both groups were equipped with a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump containing fentanyl. The analgesic used in both blocks was 0.1% ropivacaine (20 cc) on the surgical side. Patients' pain intensity [based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)], need for additional narcotics, satisfaction, and sedation scores were recorded and analyzed at various time points post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic and baseline characteristics between the two groups. However, the average NRS score was significantly lower in the RLB group at all time points post-surgery, except immediately after surgery (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the RLB group at 20 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours post-surgery (P < 0.05). The RLB group also required fewer narcotics, indicating that the RLB is more effective in managing acute postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RLB is more effective than the ESPB in reducing post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain. It also decreases narcotic consumption and associated complications. Therefore, it is recommended as a cost-effective method for managing acute pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":"e158242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-158242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgeries, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, can be severe. Despite various analgesic methods, high doses of narcotics are often required, leading to complications such as dizziness, respiratory disorders, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of two novel analgesic methods, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and the retrolaminar block (RLB), performed under ultrasound guidance, in managing pain after upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries.

Methods: In this clinical trial, candidates for elective upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries were randomly assigned to two groups (40 patients in the ESPB group and 40 in the RLB group). To manage preoperative pain, one group received an ESPB block under ultrasound guidance on the surgical side, while the other group received a RLB. Both groups were equipped with a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump containing fentanyl. The analgesic used in both blocks was 0.1% ropivacaine (20 cc) on the surgical side. Patients' pain intensity [based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)], need for additional narcotics, satisfaction, and sedation scores were recorded and analyzed at various time points post-surgery.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic and baseline characteristics between the two groups. However, the average NRS score was significantly lower in the RLB group at all time points post-surgery, except immediately after surgery (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the RLB group at 20 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours post-surgery (P < 0.05). The RLB group also required fewer narcotics, indicating that the RLB is more effective in managing acute postoperative pain.

Conclusions: The RLB is more effective than the ESPB in reducing post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain. It also decreases narcotic consumption and associated complications. Therefore, it is recommended as a cost-effective method for managing acute pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

超声引导直立者脊柱平面阻滞与后椎板阻滞对上腹部腹腔镜手术术后疼痛的比较分析。
背景:腹腔镜手术(如腹腔镜胆囊切除术)术后疼痛可能很严重。尽管有各种镇痛方法,但通常需要大剂量麻醉剂,导致头晕、呼吸系统疾病和术后恶心和呕吐等并发症。目的:本研究旨在评价超声引导下两种新型镇痛方法——竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)和椎板后阻滞(RLB)对上腹部腹腔镜手术后疼痛的治疗效果。方法:本临床试验将择期进行上腹部腹腔镜手术的患者随机分为两组(ESPB组40例,RLB组40例)。为了控制术前疼痛,一组在超声引导下手术侧接受ESPB阻滞,另一组接受RLB。两组均配备含有芬太尼的患者自控静脉镇痛泵。手术侧使用的镇痛药为0.1%罗哌卡因(20cc)。患者的疼痛强度[基于数字评定量表(NRS)]、额外麻醉剂的需求、满意度和镇静评分在术后不同时间点进行记录和分析。结果:两组患者的人口学特征和基线特征无统计学差异。RLB组除术后即刻评分外,术后各时间点平均NRS评分均显著低于RLB组(P < 0.001)。RLB组患者术后20分钟、2小时、4小时、6小时满意度均高于RLB组(P < 0.05)。RLB组还需要较少的麻醉剂,表明RLB在治疗急性术后疼痛方面更有效。结论:RLB比ESPB更能有效减轻腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛。它还可以减少麻醉消耗和相关并发症。因此,它被推荐为治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术后急性疼痛的一种经济有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信