Combining Pulsed and Conventional Radiofrequency Ablation for Resistant Morton's Neuroma: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.5812/aapm-161482
Karim Hemati, Sajede Salehi, Parnian Hemati
{"title":"Combining Pulsed and Conventional Radiofrequency Ablation for Resistant Morton's Neuroma: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Karim Hemati, Sajede Salehi, Parnian Hemati","doi":"10.5812/aapm-161482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Morton's neuroma is a painful, degenerative neuropathy that is initially managed with conservative treatments. In refractory cases, surgical excision is typically indicated. Minimally invasive percutaneous procedures provide a viable alternative to surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>While both pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and conventional radiofrequency (CRF) have been individually reported as effective treatments for Morton's neuroma, we aim to utilize a combination of PRF and CRF for pain management.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We report the case of a 61-year-old male with a five-year history of right foot Morton's neuroma, presenting with severe pain that was refractory to conservative management, including multiple corticosteroid injections. Radiofrequency was performed as follows: 5 minutes at 42°C, 1 minute at 60°C, and 1 minute at 70°C.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The patient experienced significant pain relief, with follow-up Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of 1 at two weeks, 1 at one month, and 2 at seven months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case suggests that the combined application of PRF and CRF may serve as a promising alternative for managing refractory Morton's neuroma.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":"e161482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-161482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Morton's neuroma is a painful, degenerative neuropathy that is initially managed with conservative treatments. In refractory cases, surgical excision is typically indicated. Minimally invasive percutaneous procedures provide a viable alternative to surgery.

Objective: While both pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and conventional radiofrequency (CRF) have been individually reported as effective treatments for Morton's neuroma, we aim to utilize a combination of PRF and CRF for pain management.

Case presentation: We report the case of a 61-year-old male with a five-year history of right foot Morton's neuroma, presenting with severe pain that was refractory to conservative management, including multiple corticosteroid injections. Radiofrequency was performed as follows: 5 minutes at 42°C, 1 minute at 60°C, and 1 minute at 70°C.

Result: The patient experienced significant pain relief, with follow-up Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of 1 at two weeks, 1 at one month, and 2 at seven months post-treatment.

Conclusions: This case suggests that the combined application of PRF and CRF may serve as a promising alternative for managing refractory Morton's neuroma.

脉冲与常规射频联合消融治疗顽固性莫顿神经瘤1例报告及文献复习。
莫顿神经瘤是一种疼痛的退行性神经病变,最初采用保守治疗。在难治性病例中,通常需要手术切除。微创经皮手术为外科手术提供了一种可行的替代方法。目的:虽然脉冲射频(PRF)和常规射频(CRF)都被单独报道为莫顿神经瘤的有效治疗方法,但我们的目标是利用PRF和CRF的组合来治疗疼痛。病例介绍:我们报告一例61岁男性,患有5年右脚莫顿神经瘤病史,表现为严重疼痛,保守治疗难治性,包括多次皮质类固醇注射。射频操作如下:42°C 5分钟,60°C 1分钟,70°C 1分钟。结果:患者疼痛明显缓解,治疗后2周、1个月、7个月随访NRS评分为1分。结论:该病例提示联合应用PRF和CRF可能是治疗难治性莫顿神经瘤的一种有希望的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信