Development of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000328
Handan Aydin Kahraman, Gulay Ipek Çoban
{"title":"Development of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale.","authors":"Handan Aydin Kahraman, Gulay Ipek Çoban","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to assess the risk of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) in patients. A methodological design was employed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale (MDRPI Scale).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with 200 patients who were undergoing care and treatment involving the use of medical devices. Data were collected using the Patient Descriptive Characteristics Form, the MDRPI Scale, and the Braden Risk Assessment Scale. Analyses focused on evaluating the MDRPI Scale's validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index of the MDRPI Scale was 0.87, and its Cronbach α coefficient was 0.73. The scale's items, which explained 47.063% of the total variance, were grouped under 2 factors: Factor 1-General Condition of the Patient, and Factor 2-Effect of the Medical Device on the Contact Area. The model fit indices obtained from the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported the 2-factor structure (χ 2 / df =2.091). No problematic items were identified within the final 8-item version of the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents the first comprehensive and systematic scale specifically developed to identify MDRPI risk and to evaluate the integrity of skin and mucosa in patients exposed to medical devices. The findings demonstrate that the MDRPI Scale, consisting of 8 items and 2 factors, is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the risk of MPRPIs in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"426-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to assess the risk of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) in patients. A methodological design was employed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale (MDRPI Scale).

Methods: The study was conducted with 200 patients who were undergoing care and treatment involving the use of medical devices. Data were collected using the Patient Descriptive Characteristics Form, the MDRPI Scale, and the Braden Risk Assessment Scale. Analyses focused on evaluating the MDRPI Scale's validity and reliability.

Results: The content validity index of the MDRPI Scale was 0.87, and its Cronbach α coefficient was 0.73. The scale's items, which explained 47.063% of the total variance, were grouped under 2 factors: Factor 1-General Condition of the Patient, and Factor 2-Effect of the Medical Device on the Contact Area. The model fit indices obtained from the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported the 2-factor structure (χ 2 / df =2.091). No problematic items were identified within the final 8-item version of the scale.

Conclusions: This study presents the first comprehensive and systematic scale specifically developed to identify MDRPI risk and to evaluate the integrity of skin and mucosa in patients exposed to medical devices. The findings demonstrate that the MDRPI Scale, consisting of 8 items and 2 factors, is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the risk of MPRPIs in clinical settings.

医疗器械相关压力伤害风险评估量表的编制
目的:本研究旨在建立一种有效可靠的测量工具来评估患者医疗器械相关压力损伤(mdrpi)的风险。采用方法学设计评估《医疗器械相关压力伤害风险评估量表》(MDRPI量表)的效度和信度。方法:对200例正在接受医疗器械使用护理和治疗的患者进行研究。使用患者描述性特征表、MDRPI量表和Braden风险评估量表收集数据。分析的重点是评估MDRPI量表的效度和信度。结果:MDRPI量表的内容效度指数为0.87,Cronbach α系数为0.73。量表的条目解释了47.063%的总方差,分为两个因素:因素1-患者的一般情况,因素2-医疗器械对接触面积的影响。验证性因子分析(CFA)得到的模型拟合指数支持2因素结构(χ2/df=2.091)。在最终的8项量表中,没有发现有问题的项目。结论:本研究提出了第一个专门用于识别MDRPI风险并评估暴露于医疗器械患者皮肤和粘膜完整性的全面系统量表。研究结果表明,由8个项目和2个因素组成的MDRPI量表是临床评估mprpi风险的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信