Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence, Safety, and Immunogenicity of DMB-3115, an Ustekinumab Biosimilar, and EU- and US-Stelara in Healthy Adult Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose Study.
Jun Morita, Rainard Fuhr, Thomas Koernicke, Naoki Cho, Thin Thin Mencarini, Hideki Fushimi
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence, Safety, and Immunogenicity of DMB-3115, an Ustekinumab Biosimilar, and EU- and US-Stelara in Healthy Adult Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose Study.","authors":"Jun Morita, Rainard Fuhr, Thomas Koernicke, Naoki Cho, Thin Thin Mencarini, Hideki Fushimi","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03290-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between DMB-3115 and ustekinumab (EU-Stelara or US-Stelara) as well as the safety and immunogenicity of these drugs in healthy adult participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, double-blind, three-arm parallel-group study. Healthy participants aged 18-55 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection (45 mg) of either DMB-3115, EU-Stelara, or US-Stelara. Participants were stratified into two body weight groups (< 80 vs. ≥ 80 kg). Participants were followed for 16 weeks. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>), AUC from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>), and maximum serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Immunogenicity was tested using antidrug antibody (ADA) assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 296 participants (n = 99 in the DMB-3115 group, n = 99 in the EU-Stelara group, and n = 98 in the US-Stelara group) received the study drug and were included in the safety analysis. Of these, one participant in the DMB-3115 group had no valid PK data and was excluded from the PK analysis. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratios of geometric least squares means (DMB-3115/EU-Stelara and DMB-3115/US-Stelara) of the primary PK endpoints (AUC<sub>inf</sub>, AUC<sub>last</sub>, and C<sub>max</sub>) were within the prespecified bioequivalence range of 80-125%. Originally this study was designed for the comparison of EU and US Stelara with two formulations of DMB-3115. To avoid multiplicity, a 95% CI was chosen. After that, only one formulation was selected. However, overall design was not changed. Using a 95% CI provided a more stringent level for the bioequivalence evaluation and was acceptable for European Medical Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. The proportions of participants reporting any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) were similar among the three groups. The most common TEAEs were headache, nasopharyngitis, back pain, diarrhea, and oropharyngeal pain. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, and no TEAEs led to study discontinuation. The incidences of participants with post-dose ADAs and neutralizing antibodies in DMB-3115 tended to be lower among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DMB-3115 was bioequivalent to both reference ustekinumab in terms of pharmacokinetic profile and showed similar safety and immunogenicity profile after a single subcutaneous injection in parallel groups of healthy adult participants.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>European Union Clinical Trials Register: number 2018-004033-33; date of registration 17 October 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03290-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between DMB-3115 and ustekinumab (EU-Stelara or US-Stelara) as well as the safety and immunogenicity of these drugs in healthy adult participants.
Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, three-arm parallel-group study. Healthy participants aged 18-55 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection (45 mg) of either DMB-3115, EU-Stelara, or US-Stelara. Participants were stratified into two body weight groups (< 80 vs. ≥ 80 kg). Participants were followed for 16 weeks. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf), AUC from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Immunogenicity was tested using antidrug antibody (ADA) assays.
Results: A total of 296 participants (n = 99 in the DMB-3115 group, n = 99 in the EU-Stelara group, and n = 98 in the US-Stelara group) received the study drug and were included in the safety analysis. Of these, one participant in the DMB-3115 group had no valid PK data and was excluded from the PK analysis. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratios of geometric least squares means (DMB-3115/EU-Stelara and DMB-3115/US-Stelara) of the primary PK endpoints (AUCinf, AUClast, and Cmax) were within the prespecified bioequivalence range of 80-125%. Originally this study was designed for the comparison of EU and US Stelara with two formulations of DMB-3115. To avoid multiplicity, a 95% CI was chosen. After that, only one formulation was selected. However, overall design was not changed. Using a 95% CI provided a more stringent level for the bioequivalence evaluation and was acceptable for European Medical Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. The proportions of participants reporting any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) were similar among the three groups. The most common TEAEs were headache, nasopharyngitis, back pain, diarrhea, and oropharyngeal pain. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, and no TEAEs led to study discontinuation. The incidences of participants with post-dose ADAs and neutralizing antibodies in DMB-3115 tended to be lower among the groups.
Conclusion: DMB-3115 was bioequivalent to both reference ustekinumab in terms of pharmacokinetic profile and showed similar safety and immunogenicity profile after a single subcutaneous injection in parallel groups of healthy adult participants.
Clinical trial registration: European Union Clinical Trials Register: number 2018-004033-33; date of registration 17 October 2018.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.