Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence, Safety, and Immunogenicity of DMB-3115, an Ustekinumab Biosimilar, and EU- and US-Stelara in Healthy Adult Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose Study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jun Morita, Rainard Fuhr, Thomas Koernicke, Naoki Cho, Thin Thin Mencarini, Hideki Fushimi
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence, Safety, and Immunogenicity of DMB-3115, an Ustekinumab Biosimilar, and EU- and US-Stelara in Healthy Adult Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose Study.","authors":"Jun Morita, Rainard Fuhr, Thomas Koernicke, Naoki Cho, Thin Thin Mencarini, Hideki Fushimi","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03290-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between DMB-3115 and ustekinumab (EU-Stelara or US-Stelara) as well as the safety and immunogenicity of these drugs in healthy adult participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, double-blind, three-arm parallel-group study. Healthy participants aged 18-55 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection (45 mg) of either DMB-3115, EU-Stelara, or US-Stelara. Participants were stratified into two body weight groups (< 80 vs. ≥ 80 kg). Participants were followed for 16 weeks. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>), AUC from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>), and maximum serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Immunogenicity was tested using antidrug antibody (ADA) assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 296 participants (n = 99 in the DMB-3115 group, n = 99 in the EU-Stelara group, and n = 98 in the US-Stelara group) received the study drug and were included in the safety analysis. Of these, one participant in the DMB-3115 group had no valid PK data and was excluded from the PK analysis. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratios of geometric least squares means (DMB-3115/EU-Stelara and DMB-3115/US-Stelara) of the primary PK endpoints (AUC<sub>inf</sub>, AUC<sub>last</sub>, and C<sub>max</sub>) were within the prespecified bioequivalence range of 80-125%. Originally this study was designed for the comparison of EU and US Stelara with two formulations of DMB-3115. To avoid multiplicity, a 95% CI was chosen. After that, only one formulation was selected. However, overall design was not changed. Using a 95% CI provided a more stringent level for the bioequivalence evaluation and was acceptable for European Medical Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. The proportions of participants reporting any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) were similar among the three groups. The most common TEAEs were headache, nasopharyngitis, back pain, diarrhea, and oropharyngeal pain. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, and no TEAEs led to study discontinuation. The incidences of participants with post-dose ADAs and neutralizing antibodies in DMB-3115 tended to be lower among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DMB-3115 was bioequivalent to both reference ustekinumab in terms of pharmacokinetic profile and showed similar safety and immunogenicity profile after a single subcutaneous injection in parallel groups of healthy adult participants.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>European Union Clinical Trials Register: number 2018-004033-33; date of registration 17 October 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03290-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between DMB-3115 and ustekinumab (EU-Stelara or US-Stelara) as well as the safety and immunogenicity of these drugs in healthy adult participants.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, three-arm parallel-group study. Healthy participants aged 18-55 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection (45 mg) of either DMB-3115, EU-Stelara, or US-Stelara. Participants were stratified into two body weight groups (< 80 vs. ≥ 80 kg). Participants were followed for 16 weeks. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf), AUC from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Immunogenicity was tested using antidrug antibody (ADA) assays.

Results: A total of 296 participants (n = 99 in the DMB-3115 group, n = 99 in the EU-Stelara group, and n = 98 in the US-Stelara group) received the study drug and were included in the safety analysis. Of these, one participant in the DMB-3115 group had no valid PK data and was excluded from the PK analysis. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratios of geometric least squares means (DMB-3115/EU-Stelara and DMB-3115/US-Stelara) of the primary PK endpoints (AUCinf, AUClast, and Cmax) were within the prespecified bioequivalence range of 80-125%. Originally this study was designed for the comparison of EU and US Stelara with two formulations of DMB-3115. To avoid multiplicity, a 95% CI was chosen. After that, only one formulation was selected. However, overall design was not changed. Using a 95% CI provided a more stringent level for the bioequivalence evaluation and was acceptable for European Medical Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. The proportions of participants reporting any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) were similar among the three groups. The most common TEAEs were headache, nasopharyngitis, back pain, diarrhea, and oropharyngeal pain. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, and no TEAEs led to study discontinuation. The incidences of participants with post-dose ADAs and neutralizing antibodies in DMB-3115 tended to be lower among the groups.

Conclusion: DMB-3115 was bioequivalent to both reference ustekinumab in terms of pharmacokinetic profile and showed similar safety and immunogenicity profile after a single subcutaneous injection in parallel groups of healthy adult participants.

Clinical trial registration: European Union Clinical Trials Register: number 2018-004033-33; date of registration 17 October 2018.

DMB-3115、Ustekinumab生物类似药以及EU和US-Stelara在健康成人中的药代动力学生物等效性、安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、双盲、单剂量研究
本研究的目的是研究DMB-3115和ustekinumab (EU-Stelara或US-Stelara)之间的药代动力学生物等效性,以及这些药物在健康成人参与者中的安全性和免疫原性。方法:这是一项随机、双盲、三组平行研究。年龄在18-55岁的健康参与者按1:1:1的比例随机分配,接受单次皮下注射(45毫克)DMB-3115、EU-Stelara或US-Stelara。参与者被分为两个体重组(inf),从时间0到最后可量化浓度(AUClast)的AUC和最大血清浓度(Cmax)。采用抗药抗体(ADA)检测免疫原性。结果:共有296名参与者(DMB-3115组n = 99, EU-Stelara组n = 99, US-Stelara组n = 98)接受了研究药物,并被纳入安全性分析。其中,DMB-3115组的一名参与者没有有效的PK数据,因此被排除在PK分析之外。主要PK终点(AUCinf、AUClast和Cmax)的几何最小二乘平均比值(DMB-3115/EU-Stelara和DMB-3115/US-Stelara)的95%置信区间(CI)在预定的80-125%的生物等效性范围内。本研究最初是为了比较欧盟和美国的Stelara与两种配方的DMB-3115。为避免多重性,选择95% CI。之后,只选择了一种配方。然而,总体设计并没有改变。使用95% CI为生物等效性评价提供了更严格的水平,并且为欧洲医疗机构和美国食品和药物管理局所接受。报告任何治疗不良事件(TEAE)的参与者比例在三组之间相似。最常见的teae是头痛、鼻咽炎、背痛、腹泻和口咽痛。大多数teae的严重程度为轻度或中度,没有teae导致研究中断。剂量后ADAs和DMB-3115中和抗体的发生率在各组中趋于较低。结论:DMB-3115在药代动力学方面与两种参考ustekinumab具有生物等效性,并且在健康成人参与者的平行组中单次皮下注射后显示出相似的安全性和免疫原性。临床试验注册:欧盟临床试验注册:编号2018-004033-33;注册日期2018年10月17日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信