Human Factors: Affect Everyone, Involve Everyone

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-07-29 DOI:10.1111/tct.70165
Amy Alcock, Charlotte Addy, Munawar Al-Mudhaffar, Marianne Jenkins, Melanie Cotter, Martin Edwards
{"title":"Human Factors: Affect Everyone, Involve Everyone","authors":"Amy Alcock,&nbsp;Charlotte Addy,&nbsp;Munawar Al-Mudhaffar,&nbsp;Marianne Jenkins,&nbsp;Melanie Cotter,&nbsp;Martin Edwards","doi":"10.1111/tct.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The NHS Patient Safety Syllabus highlights human factors as a core education theme for all healthcare staff. Despite this, no multidisciplinary Human Factors courses in NHS Wales have previously been reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>A multidisciplinary Human Factors course was created and delivered by a faculty with varied clinical and teaching backgrounds. The 1-day course included an introductory lecture, themed workshops and discussion about practical applications using pre-filmed simulations. A pre-course handbook and online platform facilitated consolidation of the learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>To date, we have run three courses with a total of 83 attendees: 38 doctors, 34 nurses, three managers, three midwives, two physician associates, one dentist, one pharmacist and one physiotherapist. All attendees were requested to complete pre-course and post-course questionnaires to ascertain their level of learning and knowledge gained.</p>\n \n <p>The majority, 62.0% (49/79) reported having minimal or no prior human factors teaching, clearly identifying the need for education. Confidence about human factors increased by 65.2% (17.7% [14/79] to 82.9% [68/82]), and awareness of the impact of human factors increased by 39.5% (54.4% [43/79] to 93.9% [77/82]) following the course. Qualitative feedback suggested that the course was well delivered, engaging and interesting. Comments also showed the learning would help attendees improve their clinical practice by sharing their knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This multidisciplinary pan-speciality Human Factors course has proven its need and value for all healthcare professionals. Next steps include increasing the number of courses delivered and widening the reach across the Health Board as well as gathering evidence on the patient safety implications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70165","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The NHS Patient Safety Syllabus highlights human factors as a core education theme for all healthcare staff. Despite this, no multidisciplinary Human Factors courses in NHS Wales have previously been reported.

Approach

A multidisciplinary Human Factors course was created and delivered by a faculty with varied clinical and teaching backgrounds. The 1-day course included an introductory lecture, themed workshops and discussion about practical applications using pre-filmed simulations. A pre-course handbook and online platform facilitated consolidation of the learning.

Evaluation

To date, we have run three courses with a total of 83 attendees: 38 doctors, 34 nurses, three managers, three midwives, two physician associates, one dentist, one pharmacist and one physiotherapist. All attendees were requested to complete pre-course and post-course questionnaires to ascertain their level of learning and knowledge gained.

The majority, 62.0% (49/79) reported having minimal or no prior human factors teaching, clearly identifying the need for education. Confidence about human factors increased by 65.2% (17.7% [14/79] to 82.9% [68/82]), and awareness of the impact of human factors increased by 39.5% (54.4% [43/79] to 93.9% [77/82]) following the course. Qualitative feedback suggested that the course was well delivered, engaging and interesting. Comments also showed the learning would help attendees improve their clinical practice by sharing their knowledge.

Implications

This multidisciplinary pan-speciality Human Factors course has proven its need and value for all healthcare professionals. Next steps include increasing the number of courses delivered and widening the reach across the Health Board as well as gathering evidence on the patient safety implications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人的因素:影响每个人,参与每个人
NHS患者安全教学大纲强调人为因素是所有医护人员的核心教育主题。尽管如此,没有多学科人为因素课程在NHS威尔士以前有报道。方法由具有不同临床和教学背景的教师创建和讲授多学科的人因学课程。为期一天的课程包括介绍讲座,主题研讨会和讨论使用预拍摄模拟的实际应用。课前手册和在线平台促进了学习的巩固。迄今为止,我们已经开办了三期课程,共有83名学员:38名医生、34名护士、3名管理人员、3名助产士、2名助理医师、1名牙医、1名药剂师和1名理疗师。所有与会者都被要求完成课前和课后问卷调查,以确定他们的学习水平和获得的知识。62.0%(49/79)的受访者表示,他们之前很少或没有进行过人为因素教学,这清楚地表明了教育的必要性。课程结束后,对人为因素的信心增加了65.2%(17.7%[14/79]至82.9%[68/82]),对人为因素影响的认识增加了39.5%(54.4%[43/79]至93.9%[77/82])。定性反馈表明,这门课讲得很好,引人入胜,很有趣。评论还表明,通过分享他们的知识,学习将帮助与会者提高他们的临床实践。这个多学科的泛专业人为因素课程已经证明了它对所有医疗保健专业人员的需求和价值。接下来的步骤包括增加提供的课程数量,扩大整个卫生局的覆盖范围,以及收集关于患者安全影响的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信