Karl Barth's Anti-Ideological Theology: A Reconsideration of Barth's Approach to Philosophy

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Kimlyn J. Bender
{"title":"Karl Barth's Anti-Ideological Theology: A Reconsideration of Barth's Approach to Philosophy","authors":"Kimlyn J. Bender","doi":"10.1111/ijst.12752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Barth's approach to borrowing from philosophical figures and schools is underwritten by several convictions that made such an approach intelligible. These convictions entailed that (1) Barth had no firm commitment to a philosophical school; (2) Barth's use of philosophy and philosophical terminology displays a pragmatic though principled character; and (3) Barth resisted any grand philosophical systems and rejected not only any form of philosophical hegemony but ideology of any kind. This essay makes a cumulative argument in three corresponding parts. First, against the common supposition that philosophy (and specifically Kant's philosophy) had a programmatic importance for Barth's theology, the actual evidence demonstrates an ever-weakening influence after the second <i>Römerbrief</i>. Second, in view of this examination, the mature convictions of Barth's relation to philosophy can be discerned, and when these are articulated, the overarching consistency of Barth's understanding of the relation between theology and philosophy becomes apparent. This understanding of theology's relation to philosophy is more theologically grounded and stable than is often maintained, and one predicated on a principled position regarding philosophy rather than a simple eclecticism of its use. And third and finally, Barth's principled stance evident in his relation to philosophy will be shown to be the basic mature stance he maintained in relation to all systems of thought – political and economic, and not only philosophical. When this is understood, Barth's theology is displayed as strongly anti-ideological in character.</p>","PeriodicalId":43284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Systematic Theology","volume":"27 3","pages":"372-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijst.12752","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Systematic Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijst.12752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Barth's approach to borrowing from philosophical figures and schools is underwritten by several convictions that made such an approach intelligible. These convictions entailed that (1) Barth had no firm commitment to a philosophical school; (2) Barth's use of philosophy and philosophical terminology displays a pragmatic though principled character; and (3) Barth resisted any grand philosophical systems and rejected not only any form of philosophical hegemony but ideology of any kind. This essay makes a cumulative argument in three corresponding parts. First, against the common supposition that philosophy (and specifically Kant's philosophy) had a programmatic importance for Barth's theology, the actual evidence demonstrates an ever-weakening influence after the second Römerbrief. Second, in view of this examination, the mature convictions of Barth's relation to philosophy can be discerned, and when these are articulated, the overarching consistency of Barth's understanding of the relation between theology and philosophy becomes apparent. This understanding of theology's relation to philosophy is more theologically grounded and stable than is often maintained, and one predicated on a principled position regarding philosophy rather than a simple eclecticism of its use. And third and finally, Barth's principled stance evident in his relation to philosophy will be shown to be the basic mature stance he maintained in relation to all systems of thought – political and economic, and not only philosophical. When this is understood, Barth's theology is displayed as strongly anti-ideological in character.

卡尔·巴特的反意识形态神学:对巴特哲学方法的再思考
巴特借鉴哲学人物和学派的方法得到了几个信念的支持,这些信念使这种方法变得容易理解。这些信念意味着:(1)巴特没有坚定的哲学学派的承诺;(2)巴特对哲学和哲学术语的使用虽然有原则,但却表现出语用性;(3)巴特抵制任何宏大的哲学体系,不仅反对任何形式的哲学霸权,而且反对任何形式的意识形态。本文分三个部分进行了综合论证。首先,反对普遍的假设,哲学(特别是康德的哲学)有一个纲论性的重要性为巴特的神学,实际的证据表明,一个不断削弱的影响后第二个Römerbrief。其次,从这种考察中,可以看出巴特与哲学关系的成熟信念,当这些信念被阐明时,巴特对神学与哲学关系的理解的总体一致性就变得明显了。这种对神学与哲学关系的理解比通常所坚持的更有神学基础和稳定,而且是基于对哲学的原则立场,而不是简单的折衷主义。第三,也是最后一点,巴特在他与哲学的关系中所表现出来的原则性立场,将被证明是他在与所有思想体系——政治和经济体系,而不仅仅是哲学体系——的关系中所保持的基本成熟立场。当这一点被理解时,巴特的神学表现出强烈的反意识形态特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Systematic Theology has acquired a world-wide reputation for publishing high-quality academic articles on systematic theology and for substantial reviews of major new works of scholarship. Systematic theology, which is concerned with the systematic articulation of the meaning, coherence and implications of Christian doctrine, is at the leading edge of contemporary academic theology. The discipline has undergone a remarkable transformation in the last three decades, and is now firmly established as a central area of academic teaching and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信