Reasons for Living, Spirituality and Suicidal Ideation Among Adults in a Spiritually Integrated Inpatient Programme

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Joseph M. Currier, Joshua D. Foster, Charlotte vanOyen Witvliet, Alexis D. Abernethy, Lindsey M. Root Luna, Karl VanHarn, Sarah A. Schnitker
{"title":"Reasons for Living, Spirituality and Suicidal Ideation Among Adults in a Spiritually Integrated Inpatient Programme","authors":"Joseph M. Currier,&nbsp;Joshua D. Foster,&nbsp;Charlotte vanOyen Witvliet,&nbsp;Alexis D. Abernethy,&nbsp;Lindsey M. Root Luna,&nbsp;Karl VanHarn,&nbsp;Sarah A. Schnitker","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Parallel lines of research suggest reasons for living (RFL) and spirituality often reduce risk for suicide in psychiatric patients. However, research has not examined the links and probable interplay between RFL and core aspects of patients' spirituality that might buffer suicidal ideation in times of severe psychological suffering. In total, 242 adults entering an inpatient treatment programme in a spiritually integrated behavioural health centre (40% cisgender male; 57% cisgender female; 3.0% non-binary) completed validated measures of RFL (fear of social disapproval, moral objections of suicide, survival/coping beliefs, responsibility to the family, fear of suicide), spirituality (spirituality transcendence, transcendent accountability), suicidal ideation and other mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression). Moral objections to suicide and survival and coping beliefs were moderately to strongly linked with deriving a sense of transcendence and accountability from their spirituality and better mental health (lower depression symptoms and suicide ideation). Of the RFL factors, multivariate findings suggested survival and coping beliefs mitigate suicidal ideation independently from spirituality factors whereas moral objections to suicide might serve as a vital mechanism for the protective role of spirituality in reducing suicide risk in high-risk groups. In combination, these findings highlight the need for longitudinal research to ascertain the temporal sequence of these apparent pathways to suicidal ideation along with the value of inquiring about patients' spirituality and RFL in routine assessment and intervention procedures in psychiatric settings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parallel lines of research suggest reasons for living (RFL) and spirituality often reduce risk for suicide in psychiatric patients. However, research has not examined the links and probable interplay between RFL and core aspects of patients' spirituality that might buffer suicidal ideation in times of severe psychological suffering. In total, 242 adults entering an inpatient treatment programme in a spiritually integrated behavioural health centre (40% cisgender male; 57% cisgender female; 3.0% non-binary) completed validated measures of RFL (fear of social disapproval, moral objections of suicide, survival/coping beliefs, responsibility to the family, fear of suicide), spirituality (spirituality transcendence, transcendent accountability), suicidal ideation and other mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression). Moral objections to suicide and survival and coping beliefs were moderately to strongly linked with deriving a sense of transcendence and accountability from their spirituality and better mental health (lower depression symptoms and suicide ideation). Of the RFL factors, multivariate findings suggested survival and coping beliefs mitigate suicidal ideation independently from spirituality factors whereas moral objections to suicide might serve as a vital mechanism for the protective role of spirituality in reducing suicide risk in high-risk groups. In combination, these findings highlight the need for longitudinal research to ascertain the temporal sequence of these apparent pathways to suicidal ideation along with the value of inquiring about patients' spirituality and RFL in routine assessment and intervention procedures in psychiatric settings.

生活的原因,精神和自杀意念的成年人在一个精神综合住院方案
研究的平行线表明,生活的理由(RFL)和精神经常降低精神病患者自杀的风险。然而,研究还没有检查RFL和患者精神的核心方面之间的联系和可能的相互作用,这些精神方面可能在严重的心理痛苦时期缓冲自杀念头。共有242名成年人在精神综合行为健康中心接受住院治疗方案(40%为顺性别男性;57%为顺性别女性;3.0%非二元)完成了RFL(对社会不赞成的恐惧、对自杀的道德反对、生存/应对信念、对家庭的责任、对自杀的恐惧)、灵性(灵性超越、超越责任)、自杀意念和其他心理健康症状(焦虑、抑郁)的有效测量。道德上反对自杀、生存和应对信念与从他们的灵性和更好的心理健康(较低的抑郁症状和自杀意念)中获得超越性和责任感有中度到强烈的联系。在RFL因素中,多因素研究结果表明,生存信念和应对信念对自杀意念的影响独立于精神因素,而道德反对自杀可能是精神因素在降低高危人群自杀风险中的保护作用的重要机制。综上所述,这些发现强调了纵向研究的必要性,以确定这些明显的自杀意念途径的时间序列,以及在精神科常规评估和干预程序中询问患者的精神和RFL的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信