Demonstrating the clinical utility of genomic profiling using cerebrospinal fluid to inform management of central nervous system tumors – a meta analysis of the literature

Sakshi Khurana , Qian Nie , Kala F. Schilter, Honey V. Reddi
{"title":"Demonstrating the clinical utility of genomic profiling using cerebrospinal fluid to inform management of central nervous system tumors – a meta analysis of the literature","authors":"Sakshi Khurana ,&nbsp;Qian Nie ,&nbsp;Kala F. Schilter,&nbsp;Honey V. Reddi","doi":"10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Meta-analysis of literature was performed to gain an understanding of the performance of genomic profiling assays in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis and management of CNS cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using PRISMA methodology, PubMed was searched with the following search terms; “CSF and liquid biopsy” and “cerebrospinal fluid, liquid biopsy, mutations.” Key data fields such as DNA input, technologies used, biomarkers evaluated, types of CNS tumors, sensitivity and specificity, and performance outcomes were analyzed. Studies were excluded if they did not evaluate cancer, use CSF or molecular test methods, had &lt;10 patients, involved pediatric cases or were review articles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 63 studies were included in the analysis with a majority using ctDNA (n = 38) and targeted NGS panels (n = 45) with both sensitivity and specificity being reported in 24 studies. Of the samples sequenced, 76 % of the primary cancers were gliomas with lung cancer making up 67 % of the metastatic cancers. The Belay Summit™ test performed significantly better in both primary and metastatic CNS cancers with 88 % and 95 % sensitivity respectively compared to studies that used NGS with 6 of the 24 demonstrating a median sensitivity of 47 ± 1.95 % for primary and 7 of 24 demonstrating a median sensitivity of 71 ± 0.76 % for metastatic cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CSF does have potential to inform treatment and management of CNS tumors. For a CSF based molecular test to be highly sensitive and specific, key considerations include panel content, methodology used, the type of variants being evaluated and the inclusion of true negative controls.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Liquid Biopsy","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Liquid Biopsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950195425000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Meta-analysis of literature was performed to gain an understanding of the performance of genomic profiling assays in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis and management of CNS cancers.

Methods

Using PRISMA methodology, PubMed was searched with the following search terms; “CSF and liquid biopsy” and “cerebrospinal fluid, liquid biopsy, mutations.” Key data fields such as DNA input, technologies used, biomarkers evaluated, types of CNS tumors, sensitivity and specificity, and performance outcomes were analyzed. Studies were excluded if they did not evaluate cancer, use CSF or molecular test methods, had <10 patients, involved pediatric cases or were review articles.

Results

A total of 63 studies were included in the analysis with a majority using ctDNA (n = 38) and targeted NGS panels (n = 45) with both sensitivity and specificity being reported in 24 studies. Of the samples sequenced, 76 % of the primary cancers were gliomas with lung cancer making up 67 % of the metastatic cancers. The Belay Summit™ test performed significantly better in both primary and metastatic CNS cancers with 88 % and 95 % sensitivity respectively compared to studies that used NGS with 6 of the 24 demonstrating a median sensitivity of 47 ± 1.95 % for primary and 7 of 24 demonstrating a median sensitivity of 71 ± 0.76 % for metastatic cancers.

Conclusions

CSF does have potential to inform treatment and management of CNS tumors. For a CSF based molecular test to be highly sensitive and specific, key considerations include panel content, methodology used, the type of variants being evaluated and the inclusion of true negative controls.
展示脑脊液基因组分析在中枢神经系统肿瘤治疗中的临床应用——文献荟萃分析
目的:对文献进行meta分析,以了解脑脊液(CSF)基因组谱分析在中枢神经系统癌症诊断和治疗中的作用。方法采用PRISMA方法对PubMed进行检索,检索词如下:“脑脊液和液体活检”和“脑脊液,液体活检,突变”分析了关键数据领域,如DNA输入、使用的技术、评估的生物标志物、中枢神经系统肿瘤类型、敏感性和特异性以及性能结果。如果研究没有评估癌症,使用CSF或分子检测方法,有10名患者,涉及儿科病例或综述文章,则排除研究。结果共纳入63项研究,其中大多数使用ctDNA (n = 38)和靶向NGS面板(n = 45),其中24项研究报告了敏感性和特异性。在测序的样本中,76%的原发癌症是胶质瘤,肺癌占转移性癌症的67%。与使用NGS的研究相比,Belay Summit™测试在原发性和转移性中枢神经系统癌症中的表现都明显更好,分别为88%和95%,24项研究中有6项显示原发性中位敏感性为47±1.95%,24项研究中有7项显示转移性癌症的中位敏感性为71±0.76%。结论scsf确实有潜力为中枢神经系统肿瘤的治疗和管理提供信息。要使基于CSF的分子检测具有高灵敏度和特异性,关键考虑因素包括小组内容、使用的方法、评估的变异类型以及是否包含真阴性对照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信