Diverging roads: A panel analysis on motorisation rates in German counties from 2012 to 2022

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Isabelle Wachter , Christian Holz-Rau , Eva Heinen
{"title":"Diverging roads: A panel analysis on motorisation rates in German counties from 2012 to 2022","authors":"Isabelle Wachter ,&nbsp;Christian Holz-Rau ,&nbsp;Eva Heinen","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motorisation rates have continued to increase in most countries. Existing studies on motorisation rates are mainly cross-sectional, offering limited insight into changes over time. However, understanding these changes is crucial for developing sustainable transport strategies.</div><div>This study addresses this limitation by analysing panel data on motorisation rates (private cars/1000 residents) in German counties from 2012 to 2022. We use fixed-effects models to examine how changes within counties over time are associated with changes in motorisation rates and between-effects models to assess how differences across counties relate to motorisation rates. This approach provides insights into both dynamic changes and long-standing differences between counties while evaluating the transferability of cross-sectional findings for understanding dynamic processes. Moreover, we stratify the analysis according to different county characteristics (location, type of region, median household income and public transport accessibility).</div><div>The results indicate complex associations between county characteristics and motorisation rates. The factors associated with motorisation rates across counties show different associations when looking at changes within counties over time. In some cases, such as the share of young adults, the associations are even opposite. These associations also vary between more and less car-dependent counties. For instance, increasing population density is associated with decreasing motorisation rates only within urban regions, and an increasing share of elderly adults is associated with increasing motorisation rates within urban regions but with declining motorisation rates in rural regions.</div><div>Our findings caution against generalising from cross-sectional data and emphasise the need for tailored strategies for different areas. In doing so, they highlight the crucial role of sub-national, longitudinal analyses in understanding the dynamics of motorisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 104364"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325002558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motorisation rates have continued to increase in most countries. Existing studies on motorisation rates are mainly cross-sectional, offering limited insight into changes over time. However, understanding these changes is crucial for developing sustainable transport strategies.
This study addresses this limitation by analysing panel data on motorisation rates (private cars/1000 residents) in German counties from 2012 to 2022. We use fixed-effects models to examine how changes within counties over time are associated with changes in motorisation rates and between-effects models to assess how differences across counties relate to motorisation rates. This approach provides insights into both dynamic changes and long-standing differences between counties while evaluating the transferability of cross-sectional findings for understanding dynamic processes. Moreover, we stratify the analysis according to different county characteristics (location, type of region, median household income and public transport accessibility).
The results indicate complex associations between county characteristics and motorisation rates. The factors associated with motorisation rates across counties show different associations when looking at changes within counties over time. In some cases, such as the share of young adults, the associations are even opposite. These associations also vary between more and less car-dependent counties. For instance, increasing population density is associated with decreasing motorisation rates only within urban regions, and an increasing share of elderly adults is associated with increasing motorisation rates within urban regions but with declining motorisation rates in rural regions.
Our findings caution against generalising from cross-sectional data and emphasise the need for tailored strategies for different areas. In doing so, they highlight the crucial role of sub-national, longitudinal analyses in understanding the dynamics of motorisation.
道路分化:对2012年至2022年德国各县机动化率的小组分析
在大多数国家,机动化率持续上升。现有关于机动化率的研究主要是横断面的,对随时间变化的见解有限。然而,了解这些变化对于制定可持续交通战略至关重要。本研究通过分析2012年至2022年德国各县机动化率(私家车/1000名居民)的面板数据,解决了这一局限性。我们使用固定效应模型来研究郡县内部随时间的变化与机动化率的变化之间的关系,使用效应间模型来评估郡县之间的差异与机动化率之间的关系。这种方法提供了对国家之间动态变化和长期差异的见解,同时评估了理解动态过程的横断面研究结果的可转移性。此外,我们根据不同的县特征(地理位置、区域类型、家庭收入中位数和公共交通可达性)对分析进行了分层。结果表明,县域特征与机动化率之间存在复杂的关联。随着时间的推移,与郡县机动化率相关的因素显示出不同的关联。在某些情况下,比如年轻人的比例,这种联系甚至是相反的。这些关联在汽车依赖程度较高和较低的县之间也有所不同。例如,人口密度的增加只与城市地区机动化率的下降有关,老年人比例的增加与城市地区机动化率的增加有关,但与农村地区机动化率的下降有关。我们的研究结果提醒人们不要从横截面数据中泛化,并强调需要针对不同领域制定量身定制的策略。在此过程中,他们强调了次国家纵向分析在理解机动化动态方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信