{"title":"Diagnostic value of low-dose CT pulmonary angiography combined with iterative reconstruction in suspected pulmonary embolism","authors":"Liangyu Wu, Suying Wu, Qin Chen, Xiaoyan Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Assessing the utility of low-dose computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) employing iterative reconstruction (IR) for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE), we compared its image quality, and radiation exposure with standard-dose CTPA protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with suspected PE were prospectively and randomly allocated to either a low-dose CTPA with IR arm (study group, n = 80) or a standard-dose CTPA plus IR arm (control group, n = 80). The low-dose group used 70 kVp and automatic tube current modulation, while the standard-dose group used 120 kVp with conventional parameters. A 5-point scale was used to evaluate subjective image quality. Objective assessment of noise and contrast was performed by quantifying the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) within the pulmonary arteries. Radiation exposure was quantified via computed tomography dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). Subjective image quality was similar, with a non-significant trend towards lower scores in the low-dose group (median 4 [IQR 3–4]) compared to the standard-dose group (P > 0.05). Objective measures showed a non-significant 4.0 % and 5.5 % reduction in SNR and CNR, respectively, in the low-dose group (P > 0.05). Noise levels (SD) were comparable. The low-dose group demonstrated notable reduced radiation exposure: CTDIvol (P < 0.001), DLP (P < 0.001), and effective dose (P < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Low-dose CTPA employing IR presents a viable option for PE diagnosis, providing similar diagnostic quality with significantly reduced radiation exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 110565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125001652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Assessing the utility of low-dose computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) employing iterative reconstruction (IR) for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE), we compared its image quality, and radiation exposure with standard-dose CTPA protocols.
Methods
Patients with suspected PE were prospectively and randomly allocated to either a low-dose CTPA with IR arm (study group, n = 80) or a standard-dose CTPA plus IR arm (control group, n = 80). The low-dose group used 70 kVp and automatic tube current modulation, while the standard-dose group used 120 kVp with conventional parameters. A 5-point scale was used to evaluate subjective image quality. Objective assessment of noise and contrast was performed by quantifying the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) within the pulmonary arteries. Radiation exposure was quantified via computed tomography dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP).
Results
Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). Subjective image quality was similar, with a non-significant trend towards lower scores in the low-dose group (median 4 [IQR 3–4]) compared to the standard-dose group (P > 0.05). Objective measures showed a non-significant 4.0 % and 5.5 % reduction in SNR and CNR, respectively, in the low-dose group (P > 0.05). Noise levels (SD) were comparable. The low-dose group demonstrated notable reduced radiation exposure: CTDIvol (P < 0.001), DLP (P < 0.001), and effective dose (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Low-dose CTPA employing IR presents a viable option for PE diagnosis, providing similar diagnostic quality with significantly reduced radiation exposure.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology