Quantifying direct public costs and externalities for a just and sustainable urban transport

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Magdala Arioli, Luis Antonio Lindau, Cristina Albuquerque, Francisco Pasqual, Pollyana Rêgo
{"title":"Quantifying direct public costs and externalities for a just and sustainable urban transport","authors":"Magdala Arioli,&nbsp;Luis Antonio Lindau,&nbsp;Cristina Albuquerque,&nbsp;Francisco Pasqual,&nbsp;Pollyana Rêgo","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The quest for a just and sustainable urban transport requires a better understanding of public resources use and transport systems impacts. In the global south we know little about city transport spending and how passenger and freight movement affects society. We developed a method to assess the investments of a Brazilian city in different transport systems (direct costs): bus public transport, freight, private motorised transport, cycling and walking. We also estimated the costs of some of the main externalities: air pollution, climate change and road fatalities. Total externalities costs (€225/capita/year) were three times higher than total direct cost (€75/capita/year). Charging externalities costs, often overlooked in public urban policies, represents significant opportunity for more equitable transport. For individual vehicles, full externality cost recoverry would add to €174/car/year. Private motorised transport, accountable for the highest external costs (54 %), received the largest share of city investments (53 %–82 %, representing up to €255/vehicle/year) while walking and cycling got the lowest (6 %–10 %). Spending on public transport during the first year of COVID19 required significant contributions from city budgets and imposed a new trend in the way bus systems are financed in Brazil, that now counts with hundreds of cities subsidising its operation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 101611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quest for a just and sustainable urban transport requires a better understanding of public resources use and transport systems impacts. In the global south we know little about city transport spending and how passenger and freight movement affects society. We developed a method to assess the investments of a Brazilian city in different transport systems (direct costs): bus public transport, freight, private motorised transport, cycling and walking. We also estimated the costs of some of the main externalities: air pollution, climate change and road fatalities. Total externalities costs (€225/capita/year) were three times higher than total direct cost (€75/capita/year). Charging externalities costs, often overlooked in public urban policies, represents significant opportunity for more equitable transport. For individual vehicles, full externality cost recoverry would add to €174/car/year. Private motorised transport, accountable for the highest external costs (54 %), received the largest share of city investments (53 %–82 %, representing up to €255/vehicle/year) while walking and cycling got the lowest (6 %–10 %). Spending on public transport during the first year of COVID19 required significant contributions from city budgets and imposed a new trend in the way bus systems are financed in Brazil, that now counts with hundreds of cities subsidising its operation.
量化公正和可持续城市交通的直接公共成本和外部性
追求公正和可持续的城市交通需要更好地了解公共资源的使用和交通系统的影响。在全球南部,我们对城市交通支出以及客运和货运如何影响社会知之甚少。我们开发了一种方法来评估巴西城市在不同交通系统(直接成本)上的投资:公交公共交通、货运、私人机动交通、骑自行车和步行。我们还估计了一些主要外部性的成本:空气污染、气候变化和道路交通事故。总外部性成本(225欧元/人/年)是总直接成本(75欧元/人/年)的三倍。在公共城市政策中经常被忽视的收取外部性成本是实现更公平运输的重要机会。对于单个车辆,全部外部性成本回收将使每辆车/年增加174欧元。私人机动交通的外部成本最高(54%),在城市投资中所占的份额最大(53% - 82%,相当于每辆车/年高达255欧元),而步行和骑自行车的投资最低(6% - 10%)。在2019冠状病毒病暴发的第一年,公共交通支出需要城市预算提供大量资金,并在巴西形成了公交系统融资方式的新趋势,目前有数百个城市为公交系统的运营提供补贴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信