{"title":"Research Progress on Occupational Stress of Weightlifting Coaches","authors":"Daoye Lu, Xiangui Bu","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aims to comprehensively review current research on occupational stress experienced by weightlifting coaches, emphasizing the primary sources of stress, its impacts, coping mechanisms, and effective intervention strategies. Recognizing occupational stress is crucial for enhancing coaches’ mental health, professional efficacy, and overall athlete performance.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic literature review was conducted, covering qualitative and quantitative studies published over the past two decades. Electronic databases including PubMed, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched using keywords such as “weightlifting coaches,” “occupational stress,” “job burnout,” and “coaching pressure.” Relevant literature was selected, analyzed, and synthesized to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Key findings of this review include: (1) primary stressors such as performance pressures, administrative duties, interpersonal conflicts, and difficulty maintaining work-life balance significantly impact weightlifting coaches; (2) chronic stress often leads to burnout, manifesting as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced professional satisfaction, consequently impairing coaching effectiveness and negatively influencing athlete performance; (3) coaches frequently employ coping strategies including seeking social support, physical activity, and mindfulness practices, though individual outcomes vary widely; and (4) organizational interventions, notably professional development, workload management, counseling services, and fostering supportive work environments, have been consistently effective in reducing occupational stress.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Occupational stress remains a critical issue for weightlifting coaches, necessitating integrated individual and organizational approaches. Future studies should explore tailored, evidence-based interventions, quantify their effectiveness, and examine the long-term implications of stress to sustainably improve coaches’ health, job satisfaction, and athlete success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"69 2","pages":"Article 107915"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379725004064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This study aims to comprehensively review current research on occupational stress experienced by weightlifting coaches, emphasizing the primary sources of stress, its impacts, coping mechanisms, and effective intervention strategies. Recognizing occupational stress is crucial for enhancing coaches’ mental health, professional efficacy, and overall athlete performance.
Method
A systematic literature review was conducted, covering qualitative and quantitative studies published over the past two decades. Electronic databases including PubMed, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched using keywords such as “weightlifting coaches,” “occupational stress,” “job burnout,” and “coaching pressure.” Relevant literature was selected, analyzed, and synthesized to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Results
Key findings of this review include: (1) primary stressors such as performance pressures, administrative duties, interpersonal conflicts, and difficulty maintaining work-life balance significantly impact weightlifting coaches; (2) chronic stress often leads to burnout, manifesting as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced professional satisfaction, consequently impairing coaching effectiveness and negatively influencing athlete performance; (3) coaches frequently employ coping strategies including seeking social support, physical activity, and mindfulness practices, though individual outcomes vary widely; and (4) organizational interventions, notably professional development, workload management, counseling services, and fostering supportive work environments, have been consistently effective in reducing occupational stress.
Discussion
Occupational stress remains a critical issue for weightlifting coaches, necessitating integrated individual and organizational approaches. Future studies should explore tailored, evidence-based interventions, quantify their effectiveness, and examine the long-term implications of stress to sustainably improve coaches’ health, job satisfaction, and athlete success.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.