Bioenergy pathways within United States net-zero CO2 emissions scenarios in the Energy Modeling Forum 37 study

IF 5.6 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Ronald D. Sands , Liz Wachs , Patrick Lamers , Olivier Bahn , Robert H. Beach , Matthew Binsted , Geoffrey Blanford , Yongxia Cai , Francisco De La Chesnaye , James A. Edmonds , Leonard Göke , Chioke Harris , Christopher Hoehne , Gyungwon J. Kim , Page Kyle , Haewon McJeon , Robbie Orvis , Sharon Showalter , Aditya Sinha , Emma Starke , Frances Wood
{"title":"Bioenergy pathways within United States net-zero CO2 emissions scenarios in the Energy Modeling Forum 37 study","authors":"Ronald D. Sands ,&nbsp;Liz Wachs ,&nbsp;Patrick Lamers ,&nbsp;Olivier Bahn ,&nbsp;Robert H. Beach ,&nbsp;Matthew Binsted ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Blanford ,&nbsp;Yongxia Cai ,&nbsp;Francisco De La Chesnaye ,&nbsp;James A. Edmonds ,&nbsp;Leonard Göke ,&nbsp;Chioke Harris ,&nbsp;Christopher Hoehne ,&nbsp;Gyungwon J. Kim ,&nbsp;Page Kyle ,&nbsp;Haewon McJeon ,&nbsp;Robbie Orvis ,&nbsp;Sharon Showalter ,&nbsp;Aditya Sinha ,&nbsp;Emma Starke ,&nbsp;Frances Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Energy Modeling Forum 37 study is organized around carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) mitigation scenarios reaching net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 2050 in the United States. This paper summarizes the potential contribution of bioenergy use in the electric power, transportation, industrial, and buildings sectors toward meeting that target based on model results. Thirteen modeling teams reported bioenergy consumption in the Reference and Net Zero scenarios. Consumption of bioenergy increased over time in the Reference scenario, from an average across models of 3.2 exajoules (EJ) in 2020 to 3.8 EJ in 2050. Average bioenergy consumption in 2050 increased further to 7.3 EJ in the Net Zero scenario. All scenarios that reach net-zero emissions required some form of carbon dioxide removal to offset emissions that are difficult to reduce. Carbon dioxide removal using bioenergy with CO<sub>2</sub> capture and storage (BECCS) varies widely across models, up to 1000 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> in 2050. Some models rely instead on direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), up to 2200 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>, and others use a combination of BECCS and DACCS. Model results show a strong inverse relationship between the amounts of BECCS and DACCS deployed. All modeling teams assumed a carbon sink from land use, land use change, and forestry, further offsetting a portion of emissions from fossil fuels and industry that are expensive to eliminate. Bioenergy consumption in 2050 decreased by an average of 1.5 EJ across eight models in a Net Zero+ scenario relative to the Net Zero scenario, due in part to a lower equilibrium carbon price resulting from optimistic cost assumptions for all energy technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100209"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278725000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Energy Modeling Forum 37 study is organized around carbon dioxide (CO2) mitigation scenarios reaching net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050 in the United States. This paper summarizes the potential contribution of bioenergy use in the electric power, transportation, industrial, and buildings sectors toward meeting that target based on model results. Thirteen modeling teams reported bioenergy consumption in the Reference and Net Zero scenarios. Consumption of bioenergy increased over time in the Reference scenario, from an average across models of 3.2 exajoules (EJ) in 2020 to 3.8 EJ in 2050. Average bioenergy consumption in 2050 increased further to 7.3 EJ in the Net Zero scenario. All scenarios that reach net-zero emissions required some form of carbon dioxide removal to offset emissions that are difficult to reduce. Carbon dioxide removal using bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage (BECCS) varies widely across models, up to 1000 Mt CO2 in 2050. Some models rely instead on direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), up to 2200 Mt CO2, and others use a combination of BECCS and DACCS. Model results show a strong inverse relationship between the amounts of BECCS and DACCS deployed. All modeling teams assumed a carbon sink from land use, land use change, and forestry, further offsetting a portion of emissions from fossil fuels and industry that are expensive to eliminate. Bioenergy consumption in 2050 decreased by an average of 1.5 EJ across eight models in a Net Zero+ scenario relative to the Net Zero scenario, due in part to a lower equilibrium carbon price resulting from optimistic cost assumptions for all energy technologies.
能源建模论坛第37期研究中美国净零二氧化碳排放情景下的生物能源途径
能源建模论坛37的研究是围绕美国到2050年实现二氧化碳净零排放的二氧化碳(CO2)缓解方案组织的。本文根据模型结果总结了生物能源在电力、交通、工业和建筑领域的潜在贡献,以实现这一目标。13个建模团队报告了参考情景和净零情景下的生物能源消耗。在参考情景中,生物能源的消费量随着时间的推移而增加,从2020年的3.2 EJ (EJ)到2050年的3.8 EJ。在净零情景下,2050年的平均生物能源消费量进一步增加到7.3 EJ。所有达到净零排放的方案都需要某种形式的二氧化碳去除来抵消难以减少的排放。利用生物能源与二氧化碳捕获和储存(BECCS)去除二氧化碳的方法在不同的模型中差异很大,到2050年将达到1000亿吨二氧化碳。一些模型依赖直接空气碳捕获和储存(DACCS),高达22亿吨二氧化碳,而其他模型则使用BECCS和DACCS的组合。模型结果显示,部署的BECCS数量与DACCS数量之间存在很强的反比关系。所有的建模团队都假设碳汇来自土地利用、土地利用变化和林业,进一步抵消了化石燃料和工业排放的一部分,这些排放要消除是昂贵的。与净零情景相比,净零+情景下的8种模式2050年生物能源消耗平均减少1.5 EJ,部分原因是对所有能源技术的乐观成本假设导致平衡碳价格降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信