Evan A. Winiger PhD, Pavel N. Lizhnyak PhD, Scott W. Drenkard MA, Andrea R. Vansickel PhD
{"title":"The Behavioral Impact of the Massachusetts Flavored Tobacco Products Ban on Cigarette Smoking Among Adults Aged ≥21 Years","authors":"Evan A. Winiger PhD, Pavel N. Lizhnyak PhD, Scott W. Drenkard MA, Andrea R. Vansickel PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2025.100364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In June of 2020, Massachusetts became the first state to implement a statewide ban on flavored tobacco. To date, no study has analyzed the behavioral outcomes of a comprehensive statewide ban on flavored tobacco products among representative state samples of adults aged ≥21 years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a difference-in-difference model from repeated cross-sectional data (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System), the authors compared cigarette smoking prevalence in Massachusetts before (January 2017–May 2020) with that after (June 2020–December 2022) the implementation of a flavor ban, with 35 states serving as a comparison. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the difference-in-difference findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a consistent decline in smoking prevalence in Massachusetts (14.1% in 2017 to 10.7% in 2022) and comparator states (18.5% in 2017 to 14.8% in 2022). When adjusting for sociodemographic and the year-fixed effect, the analysis indicated significant effects of time (AOR=1.05; 95% CI=1.00, 1.11, <em>p</em>=0.0428) and treatment (AOR=0.89; 95% CI=0.84, 0.95, <em>p</em>=0.0002) but not for the difference-in-difference estimate (AOR=0.94; 95% CI=0.85, 1.03, <em>p</em>=0.1621).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results indicate that the comprehensive flavor ban in Massachusetts did not significantly impact smoking prevalence relative to that in comparator states without flavor bans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 5","pages":"Article 100364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065425000525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
In June of 2020, Massachusetts became the first state to implement a statewide ban on flavored tobacco. To date, no study has analyzed the behavioral outcomes of a comprehensive statewide ban on flavored tobacco products among representative state samples of adults aged ≥21 years.
Methods
Using a difference-in-difference model from repeated cross-sectional data (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System), the authors compared cigarette smoking prevalence in Massachusetts before (January 2017–May 2020) with that after (June 2020–December 2022) the implementation of a flavor ban, with 35 states serving as a comparison. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the difference-in-difference findings.
Results
There was a consistent decline in smoking prevalence in Massachusetts (14.1% in 2017 to 10.7% in 2022) and comparator states (18.5% in 2017 to 14.8% in 2022). When adjusting for sociodemographic and the year-fixed effect, the analysis indicated significant effects of time (AOR=1.05; 95% CI=1.00, 1.11, p=0.0428) and treatment (AOR=0.89; 95% CI=0.84, 0.95, p=0.0002) but not for the difference-in-difference estimate (AOR=0.94; 95% CI=0.85, 1.03, p=0.1621).
Conclusions
The results indicate that the comprehensive flavor ban in Massachusetts did not significantly impact smoking prevalence relative to that in comparator states without flavor bans.