Traceability principles in waste stakeholder discourse: Toward a general conceptual framework for plastics supply chain traceability

IF 6.8 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Laura McGillivray , Hope Johnson , Afshin Akhtar-Khavari , Christopher Barner-Kowollik , Mark Lauchs , Lewis Chambers , James Blinco
{"title":"Traceability principles in waste stakeholder discourse: Toward a general conceptual framework for plastics supply chain traceability","authors":"Laura McGillivray ,&nbsp;Hope Johnson ,&nbsp;Afshin Akhtar-Khavari ,&nbsp;Christopher Barner-Kowollik ,&nbsp;Mark Lauchs ,&nbsp;Lewis Chambers ,&nbsp;James Blinco","doi":"10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Improving plastics traceability is often positioned as a key solution to plastics pollution in institutional, industry, and academic discourse. Correspondingly, the lack of traceability regarding various aspects of plastics including their specific content (i.e. the mix of polymers and additives used) and the flows of plastics from production through to waste (i.e. the difficulty of tracking where plastics start and end) are widely understood as key barriers to effective interventions. There is, however, no consolidated understanding of the fundamental conceptual aspects of plastics traceability, with most literature focusing on its technical challenges and opportunities and overlooking governance perspectives. Understanding the conceptual dimensions that inform plastics traceability can assist stakeholders in designing and implementing better traceability schemes. It can also help expand the technology-centric standpoint to recognise that traceability is also about values, norms, and systems. This paper seeks to contribute these perspectives to the development of a principles-based conceptual framework for plastics traceability. This conceptual framework is developed using a qualitative analysis of submissions to the (Australian) National Traceability Framework Consultation, interviews with plastic packaging stakeholders in the Australian context, and relevant industry and policy documents. The research approach is distinctive in its socio-legal perspective and systematic multi-source discourse analysis. The research identified circularity, data generation, assurance, transparency, responsibility, and adaptability as the principles that should, according to stakeholders, inform the design of plastics traceability. It also identifies best practice strategies and pressure points in operationalising these principles of traceability. These results can inform future scholarship towards a common conceptual framework for plastics traceability. The principles identified can also provide clarity and direction in the overarching goals, design, and governance of traceability systems for regulators and companies looking to advance supply chain governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100253,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772390925000538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving plastics traceability is often positioned as a key solution to plastics pollution in institutional, industry, and academic discourse. Correspondingly, the lack of traceability regarding various aspects of plastics including their specific content (i.e. the mix of polymers and additives used) and the flows of plastics from production through to waste (i.e. the difficulty of tracking where plastics start and end) are widely understood as key barriers to effective interventions. There is, however, no consolidated understanding of the fundamental conceptual aspects of plastics traceability, with most literature focusing on its technical challenges and opportunities and overlooking governance perspectives. Understanding the conceptual dimensions that inform plastics traceability can assist stakeholders in designing and implementing better traceability schemes. It can also help expand the technology-centric standpoint to recognise that traceability is also about values, norms, and systems. This paper seeks to contribute these perspectives to the development of a principles-based conceptual framework for plastics traceability. This conceptual framework is developed using a qualitative analysis of submissions to the (Australian) National Traceability Framework Consultation, interviews with plastic packaging stakeholders in the Australian context, and relevant industry and policy documents. The research approach is distinctive in its socio-legal perspective and systematic multi-source discourse analysis. The research identified circularity, data generation, assurance, transparency, responsibility, and adaptability as the principles that should, according to stakeholders, inform the design of plastics traceability. It also identifies best practice strategies and pressure points in operationalising these principles of traceability. These results can inform future scholarship towards a common conceptual framework for plastics traceability. The principles identified can also provide clarity and direction in the overarching goals, design, and governance of traceability systems for regulators and companies looking to advance supply chain governance.
废物利益相关者话语中的可追溯性原则:迈向塑料供应链可追溯性的一般概念框架
提高塑料的可追溯性通常被定位为机构、工业和学术话语中塑料污染的关键解决方案。相应地,塑料的各个方面缺乏可追溯性,包括它们的具体含量(即所使用的聚合物和添加剂的混合)和塑料从生产到废物的流动(即难以跟踪塑料从哪里开始和结束)被广泛认为是有效干预的主要障碍。然而,对塑料可追溯性的基本概念方面没有统一的理解,大多数文献关注的是其技术挑战和机遇,而忽视了治理观点。了解塑料可追溯性的概念维度可以帮助利益相关者设计和实施更好的可追溯性计划。它还可以帮助扩展以技术为中心的立场,认识到可追溯性也与价值、规范和系统有关。本文旨在为塑料可追溯性的基于原则的概念框架的发展提供这些观点。这一概念框架是通过对提交给(澳大利亚)国家可追溯性框架咨询的材料进行定性分析、对澳大利亚塑料包装利益相关者的访谈以及相关的行业和政策文件制定的。其研究方法具有鲜明的社会法学视角和系统的多源话语分析。该研究确定了循环、数据生成、保证、透明度、责任和适应性作为原则,根据利益相关者的说法,这些原则应该为塑料可追溯性的设计提供信息。它还确定了在操作这些可追溯性原则时的最佳实践策略和压力点。这些结果可以为未来塑料可追溯性的共同概念框架提供信息。确定的原则还可以为寻求推进供应链治理的监管机构和公司提供总体目标、设计和可追溯性系统治理的清晰度和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信