{"title":"Weak Baumgartner axioms and universal spaces","authors":"Corey Bacal Switzer","doi":"10.1016/j.topol.2025.109530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>If <em>X</em> is a topological space and <em>κ</em> is a cardinal then <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>BA</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>X</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> is the statement that for each pair <span><math><mi>A</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>⊆</mo><mi>X</mi></math></span> of <em>κ</em>-dense subsets there is an autohomeomorphism <span><math><mi>h</mi><mo>:</mo><mi>X</mi><mo>→</mo><mi>X</mi></math></span> mapping <em>A</em> to <em>B</em>. In particular <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>BA</mi></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>ℵ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>R</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> is equivalent the celebrated Baumgartner axiom on isomorphism types of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ℵ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>-dense linear orders. In this paper we consider two natural weakenings of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>BA</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>X</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> which we call <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>BA</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></msubsup><mo>(</mo><mi>X</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>X</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> for arbitrary perfect Polish spaces <em>X</em>. We show that the first of these, though properly weaker, entails many of the more striking consequences of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>BA</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>X</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> while the second does not. Nevertheless the second is still independent of <span><math><mi>ZFC</mi></math></span> and we show in particular that it fails in the Cohen and random models. This motivates several new classes of pairs of spaces which are “very far from being homeomorphic” which we call “avoiding”, “strongly avoiding”, and “totally avoiding”. The paper concludes by studying these classes, particularly in the context of forcing theory, in an attempt to gauge how different weak Baumgartner axioms may be separated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51201,"journal":{"name":"Topology and its Applications","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 109530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topology and its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166864125003281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
If X is a topological space and κ is a cardinal then is the statement that for each pair of κ-dense subsets there is an autohomeomorphism mapping A to B. In particular is equivalent the celebrated Baumgartner axiom on isomorphism types of -dense linear orders. In this paper we consider two natural weakenings of which we call and for arbitrary perfect Polish spaces X. We show that the first of these, though properly weaker, entails many of the more striking consequences of while the second does not. Nevertheless the second is still independent of and we show in particular that it fails in the Cohen and random models. This motivates several new classes of pairs of spaces which are “very far from being homeomorphic” which we call “avoiding”, “strongly avoiding”, and “totally avoiding”. The paper concludes by studying these classes, particularly in the context of forcing theory, in an attempt to gauge how different weak Baumgartner axioms may be separated.
期刊介绍:
Topology and its Applications is primarily concerned with publishing original research papers of moderate length. However, a limited number of carefully selected survey or expository papers are also included. The mathematical focus of the journal is that suggested by the title: Research in Topology. It is felt that it is inadvisable to attempt a definitive description of topology as understood for this journal. Certainly the subject includes the algebraic, general, geometric, and set-theoretic facets of topology as well as areas of interactions between topology and other mathematical disciplines, e.g. topological algebra, topological dynamics, functional analysis, category theory. Since the roles of various aspects of topology continue to change, the non-specific delineation of topics serves to reflect the current state of research in topology.
At regular intervals, the journal publishes a section entitled Open Problems in Topology, edited by J. van Mill and G.M. Reed. This is a status report on the 1100 problems listed in the book of the same name published by North-Holland in 1990, edited by van Mill and Reed.