Gas-liquid two-phase flow rate measurement with differential pressure and density ratio synergistic dual neural network

IF 2.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Fachun Liang , Boyu Duan , Changrong Li , Weibiao Zheng , Yixuan Zhu , Mengyuan Li , Manqing Jin
{"title":"Gas-liquid two-phase flow rate measurement with differential pressure and density ratio synergistic dual neural network","authors":"Fachun Liang ,&nbsp;Boyu Duan ,&nbsp;Changrong Li ,&nbsp;Weibiao Zheng ,&nbsp;Yixuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Mengyuan Li ,&nbsp;Manqing Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.102994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Machine learning has been widely applied in the field of fluid measurement. Establishing the mapping relationship between feature data, quality, and total mass flow rate is crucial for accurate measurement of gas-liquid two-phase flow. This study proposes two MLP models for gas-liquid two-phase flow measurement. A throttling experiment was conducted using a nozzle with a throat diameter of 12 mm, a total of 122 sets of experimental data were collected, with superficial gas velocity and superficial liquid velocity coverage ranges of 1.73–20.72 m/s and 0.0173–0.242 m/s, respectively, covering four flow patterns: stratified flow, wave flow, slug flow, and annular flow. By combining throttling mechanisms for feature selection, the input features of the quality prediction model are determined to be square root differential pressure ratio and square root gas-liquid density ratio, while the input features of the total mass flow rate prediction model are square root difference of double differential pressure and square root gas-liquid density ratio. And validate the effectiveness of features using Spearman and Pearson correlation analysis methods. The study results indicate that the relative error of the test samples for quality prediction model is within ±7 %, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is 2.78 %. The relative error of the test samples for total mass flow rate prediction model is within ±6 %, and the MAPE is 2.05 %. Both models were validated through 5-fold cross validation to ensure no overfitting occurred. This work avoids the problem of error accumulation through a dual model parallel prediction architecture, and achieves high-precision flow rate prediction with a small number of features and a small sample dataset, providing a data-driven new solution with practical engineering value for gas-liquid two-phase flow rate measurement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50440,"journal":{"name":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598625001864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning has been widely applied in the field of fluid measurement. Establishing the mapping relationship between feature data, quality, and total mass flow rate is crucial for accurate measurement of gas-liquid two-phase flow. This study proposes two MLP models for gas-liquid two-phase flow measurement. A throttling experiment was conducted using a nozzle with a throat diameter of 12 mm, a total of 122 sets of experimental data were collected, with superficial gas velocity and superficial liquid velocity coverage ranges of 1.73–20.72 m/s and 0.0173–0.242 m/s, respectively, covering four flow patterns: stratified flow, wave flow, slug flow, and annular flow. By combining throttling mechanisms for feature selection, the input features of the quality prediction model are determined to be square root differential pressure ratio and square root gas-liquid density ratio, while the input features of the total mass flow rate prediction model are square root difference of double differential pressure and square root gas-liquid density ratio. And validate the effectiveness of features using Spearman and Pearson correlation analysis methods. The study results indicate that the relative error of the test samples for quality prediction model is within ±7 %, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is 2.78 %. The relative error of the test samples for total mass flow rate prediction model is within ±6 %, and the MAPE is 2.05 %. Both models were validated through 5-fold cross validation to ensure no overfitting occurred. This work avoids the problem of error accumulation through a dual model parallel prediction architecture, and achieves high-precision flow rate prediction with a small number of features and a small sample dataset, providing a data-driven new solution with practical engineering value for gas-liquid two-phase flow rate measurement.
压差密度比协同双神经网络测量气液两相流量
机器学习在流体测量领域得到了广泛的应用。建立特征数据、质量和总质量流量之间的映射关系是准确测量气液两相流的关键。本文提出了两种用于气液两相流测量的MLP模型。采用喉道直径为12 mm的喷管进行节流实验,共采集了122组实验数据,浅表气速覆盖范围为1.73 ~ 20.72 m/s,浅表液速覆盖范围为0.0173 ~ 0.242 m/s,涵盖了分层流、波状流、段塞流和环空流四种流型。结合节流机理进行特征选择,确定质量预测模型的输入特征为根差压比和根气液密度比,总质量流量预测模型的输入特征为双压差的根差和根气液密度比的根差。并利用Spearman和Pearson相关分析方法验证特征的有效性。结果表明,质量预测模型的相对误差在±7%以内,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为2.78%。总质量流量预测模型的相对误差在±6%以内,MAPE为2.05%。两种模型均通过5倍交叉验证进行验证,以确保不发生过拟合。该工作通过双模型并行预测架构避免了误差积累问题,以较少的特征和小样本数据集实现了高精度的流量预测,为气液两相流量测量提供了一种具有实际工程价值的数据驱动的新解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Flow Measurement and Instrumentation is dedicated to disseminating the latest research results on all aspects of flow measurement, in both closed conduits and open channels. The design of flow measurement systems involves a wide variety of multidisciplinary activities including modelling the flow sensor, the fluid flow and the sensor/fluid interactions through the use of computation techniques; the development of advanced transducer systems and their associated signal processing and the laboratory and field assessment of the overall system under ideal and disturbed conditions. FMI is the essential forum for critical information exchange, and contributions are particularly encouraged in the following areas of interest: Modelling: the application of mathematical and computational modelling to the interaction of fluid dynamics with flowmeters, including flowmeter behaviour, improved flowmeter design and installation problems. Application of CAD/CAE techniques to flowmeter modelling are eligible. Design and development: the detailed design of the flowmeter head and/or signal processing aspects of novel flowmeters. Emphasis is given to papers identifying new sensor configurations, multisensor flow measurement systems, non-intrusive flow metering techniques and the application of microelectronic techniques in smart or intelligent systems. Calibration techniques: including descriptions of new or existing calibration facilities and techniques, calibration data from different flowmeter types, and calibration intercomparison data from different laboratories. Installation effect data: dealing with the effects of non-ideal flow conditions on flowmeters. Papers combining a theoretical understanding of flowmeter behaviour with experimental work are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信