The uneven effects of gender parity: Trends in gender homophily in scientific publications, 1980–2019

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Margarita Torre , Jesús A. Prieto-Alonso , Iñaki Ucar
{"title":"The uneven effects of gender parity: Trends in gender homophily in scientific publications, 1980–2019","authors":"Margarita Torre ,&nbsp;Jesús A. Prieto-Alonso ,&nbsp;Iñaki Ucar","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines gender collaboration patterns across male-dominated, gender-neutral, and female-dominated fields. Using data from the Web of Science, we investigate how the increasing participation of women in research affects gender homophily in scientific collaborations. Our analysis covers articles indexed from 1980 to 2019, encompassing 15,642 journals, 28,241,100 articles, and 111,980,858 authorships across 153 research areas. We find that gender homophily is most pronounced in fields at the intersection of male-dominated and gender-neutral areas and lowest in female-dominated fields. We suggest that this asymmetry arises from differing incentives for cross-gender collaboration. Men may view the increasing presence of women in traditionally male fields as a threat to the status quo, reinforcing exclusionary behaviors like homophily. In contrast, women may view cross-gender collaboration as an opportunity to enhance their status and expand their networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X25000894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines gender collaboration patterns across male-dominated, gender-neutral, and female-dominated fields. Using data from the Web of Science, we investigate how the increasing participation of women in research affects gender homophily in scientific collaborations. Our analysis covers articles indexed from 1980 to 2019, encompassing 15,642 journals, 28,241,100 articles, and 111,980,858 authorships across 153 research areas. We find that gender homophily is most pronounced in fields at the intersection of male-dominated and gender-neutral areas and lowest in female-dominated fields. We suggest that this asymmetry arises from differing incentives for cross-gender collaboration. Men may view the increasing presence of women in traditionally male fields as a threat to the status quo, reinforcing exclusionary behaviors like homophily. In contrast, women may view cross-gender collaboration as an opportunity to enhance their status and expand their networks.
性别平等的不平衡影响:1980-2019年科学出版物中性别同一性的趋势
本研究考察了男性主导、中性和女性主导领域的性别合作模式。利用来自科学网络的数据,我们调查了女性越来越多地参与研究如何影响科学合作中的性别同质性。我们的分析涵盖了1980年至2019年索引的文章,包括153个研究领域的15,642种期刊,28,241,100篇文章和111,980,858位作者。我们发现,性别同一性在男性主导和性别中立领域的交叉领域最为明显,而在女性主导的领域则最低。我们认为这种不对称源于对跨性别合作的不同激励。男性可能会将女性在传统男性领域的日益增多视为对现状的威胁,从而强化了同性恋等排他性行为。相比之下,女性可能将跨性别合作视为提高自己地位和扩大网络的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信