Development of an evidence-based protocol for the prevention of perioperative pressure injuries in pediatric cardiac surgery: A Delphi study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Xiangai Ma , Jialu Fan , Jiehui Wang , He Lin
{"title":"Development of an evidence-based protocol for the prevention of perioperative pressure injuries in pediatric cardiac surgery: A Delphi study","authors":"Xiangai Ma ,&nbsp;Jialu Fan ,&nbsp;Jiehui Wang ,&nbsp;He Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at high risk for perioperative pressure injuries (PPIs). This study aimed to develop an evidence-based protocol for the prevention of PPIs in pediatric cardiac surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature review was conducted to identify and summarize the existing evidence on PPI prevention in pediatric cardiac surgery to construct an initial protocol. Two rounds of Delphi surveys were then performed to refine the protocol. The expert panel consisted of 20 multidisciplinary professionals from five tertiary hospitals, including nurses, surgeons, and anesthesiologists, 85 % of whom possess more than 20 years of clinical experience. The mean values of importance and feasibility of each indicator were calculated. Reliability of the Delphi method assessed by valid response rate, authority coefficient (Cr), coefficient of variation (CV) and Kendall’ W coefficient (Kendall’ W).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Consensus was reached on 4 first-level items, 15 s-level items, and 27 third-level items for the PPI prevention protocol. The valid response rates for the two Delphi rounds were 83.3 % and 100 %, respectively, with Cr of 0.905 and 0.901, CV of less than 0.25, and Kendall’ W of 0.172 and 0.142 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The developed PPI prevention protocol for pediatric cardiac surgery is both scientific and feasible, providing a reference for perioperative nurses to implement systematic and standardized PPI prevention care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":"34 4","pages":"Article 100948"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X25000968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at high risk for perioperative pressure injuries (PPIs). This study aimed to develop an evidence-based protocol for the prevention of PPIs in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Methods

A literature review was conducted to identify and summarize the existing evidence on PPI prevention in pediatric cardiac surgery to construct an initial protocol. Two rounds of Delphi surveys were then performed to refine the protocol. The expert panel consisted of 20 multidisciplinary professionals from five tertiary hospitals, including nurses, surgeons, and anesthesiologists, 85 % of whom possess more than 20 years of clinical experience. The mean values of importance and feasibility of each indicator were calculated. Reliability of the Delphi method assessed by valid response rate, authority coefficient (Cr), coefficient of variation (CV) and Kendall’ W coefficient (Kendall’ W).

Results

Consensus was reached on 4 first-level items, 15 s-level items, and 27 third-level items for the PPI prevention protocol. The valid response rates for the two Delphi rounds were 83.3 % and 100 %, respectively, with Cr of 0.905 and 0.901, CV of less than 0.25, and Kendall’ W of 0.172 and 0.142 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The developed PPI prevention protocol for pediatric cardiac surgery is both scientific and feasible, providing a reference for perioperative nurses to implement systematic and standardized PPI prevention care.
儿童心脏外科围手术期压力损伤预防循证方案的发展:德尔菲研究
摘要接受心脏手术的儿科患者围手术期压力损伤(PPIs)的风险较高。本研究旨在为儿童心脏手术中PPIs的预防制定循证方案。方法通过文献回顾,识别和总结现有的预防小儿心脏外科应用PPI的证据,构建初步方案。然后进行两轮德尔菲调查以完善方案。专家组由来自五所三级医院的20名多学科专业人员组成,包括护士、外科医生和麻醉师,其中85%具有20年以上的临床经验。计算各指标重要性和可行性的平均值。采用有效应答率、权威系数(Cr)、变异系数(CV)和Kendall ' W系数(Kendall ' W)评价德尔菲法的可靠性。结果对PPI预防方案的4个一级项目、15个s级项目和27个三级项目达成共识。两轮德尔菲的有效有效率分别为83.3%和100%,Cr分别为0.905和0.901,CV小于0.25,Kendall ' W分别为0.172和0.142 (P <;0.001)。结论制定的小儿心脏外科PPI预防方案科学可行,可为围手术期护士实施系统、规范的PPI预防护理提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of tissue viability
Journal of tissue viability DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management. The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信