Detection of tooth-colored composite restorations via optical analysis - hyperspectral imaging (400 nm–1000 nm) and near-infrared spectroscopy (1550 nm–1950 nm)

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
PW Radicke , St Lüdtke , J. Dreßler , C. Babian
{"title":"Detection of tooth-colored composite restorations via optical analysis - hyperspectral imaging (400 nm–1000 nm) and near-infrared spectroscopy (1550 nm–1950 nm)","authors":"PW Radicke ,&nbsp;St Lüdtke ,&nbsp;J. Dreßler ,&nbsp;C. Babian","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The proportion of teeth restored with tooth-colored composite restorations increased significantly in recent decades. Owing to improvements in their composition and processing technique, they visually appear almost indistinguishable from native tooth structure. This poses a challenge when establishing and comparing the postmortem dental status in order to identify an unknown body. This study investigated two different wavelength ranges using hyperspectral imaging and near-infrared-spectroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>78 extracted teeth were restored with single and multi surface dental resin restorations. Nine different composites from seven different manufacturers were included. Hyperspectral imaging (400 nm – 1000 nm) and near-infrared spectroscopy (1550 nm – 1950 nm) were compared for their usability. The recorded spectra were evaluated via graphical plots, statistical comparison and by the use of a classification model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dental composite and enamel are defined by different spectral characteristics above the range of visible light. Wavelength between 1550 nm and 1950 nm revealed a clear difference over the entire range. Statistically significant differences were found for the range of 1750 nm to 1800 nm (α= 0.01, p = 1.588e<sup>−14</sup>). In 400 nm to 1000 nm, a clear optical differentiation was not possible. For both ranges, the classification model achieved an accuracy of 84 % (400–1000 nm, HSI) and 99.8 % (1550–1950 nm, NIS) for the correct labeling of enamel and composite.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The two wavelength ranges connected to portable NIS and HSI devices differ in the accuracy with which native tooth structure and restorative material can be distinguished. The NIR-range, tested through NIS allows reliable detection of tooth colored restorations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"376 ","pages":"Article 112583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037907382500221X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The proportion of teeth restored with tooth-colored composite restorations increased significantly in recent decades. Owing to improvements in their composition and processing technique, they visually appear almost indistinguishable from native tooth structure. This poses a challenge when establishing and comparing the postmortem dental status in order to identify an unknown body. This study investigated two different wavelength ranges using hyperspectral imaging and near-infrared-spectroscopy.

Methods

78 extracted teeth were restored with single and multi surface dental resin restorations. Nine different composites from seven different manufacturers were included. Hyperspectral imaging (400 nm – 1000 nm) and near-infrared spectroscopy (1550 nm – 1950 nm) were compared for their usability. The recorded spectra were evaluated via graphical plots, statistical comparison and by the use of a classification model.

Results

Dental composite and enamel are defined by different spectral characteristics above the range of visible light. Wavelength between 1550 nm and 1950 nm revealed a clear difference over the entire range. Statistically significant differences were found for the range of 1750 nm to 1800 nm (α= 0.01, p = 1.588e−14). In 400 nm to 1000 nm, a clear optical differentiation was not possible. For both ranges, the classification model achieved an accuracy of 84 % (400–1000 nm, HSI) and 99.8 % (1550–1950 nm, NIS) for the correct labeling of enamel and composite.

Conclusions

The two wavelength ranges connected to portable NIS and HSI devices differ in the accuracy with which native tooth structure and restorative material can be distinguished. The NIR-range, tested through NIS allows reliable detection of tooth colored restorations.
通过光学分析-高光谱成像(400 nm - 1000 nm)和近红外光谱(1550 nm - 1950 nm)检测牙色复合修复体
目的近几十年来,采用牙色复合修复体修复牙齿的比例显著增加。由于其成分和加工技术的改进,它们在视觉上几乎与天然牙齿结构无法区分。这对建立和比较死后牙齿状态以识别未知尸体提出了挑战。本研究利用高光谱成像和近红外光谱研究了两个不同的波长范围。方法对78例拔牙进行单面和多面树脂修复。其中包括来自7家不同制造商的9种不同的复合材料。比较了高光谱成像(400 nm - 1000 nm)和近红外成像(1550 nm - 1950 nm)的可用性。记录的光谱通过图表、统计比较和使用分类模型进行评估。结果牙复合材料和牙釉质在可见光范围内具有不同的光谱特征。1550 nm和1950 nm之间的波长在整个范围内显示出明显的差异。在1750 nm和1800 nm范围内,差异有统计学意义(α= 0.01, p = 1.588e−14)。在400 nm到1000 nm,不可能有清晰的光学分化。在这两个范围内,该分类模型对牙釉质和复合材料的正确标记准确率分别为84 %(400-1000 nm, HSI)和99.8 %(1550-1950 nm, NIS)。结论便携式NIS和HSI设备连接的两个波长范围对原牙结构和修复材料的识别精度存在差异。通过NIS测试的nir范围可以可靠地检测牙齿彩色修复体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信