{"title":"Subgrid drag models for simulating circulating turbulent fluidized beds of Geldart A particles","authors":"Hongji Liu , Shanwei Hu , Xinhua Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.partic.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The novel circulating turbulent fluidized bed (CTFB) technology has found wide applications in various processes owing to its high solid circulation rate and low backmixing. However, up to now, only a limited number of CFD simulation studies on this type of reactor can be found in the literature. Moreover, there is currently no guidance available for selecting appropriate subgrid drag models that take into account the impact of mesoscale structures. In this work, a two-fluid model incorporating seven different drag models include homogeneous drag models, filtered models, and EMMS-based drag models was employed to conduct a systematic investigation into the hydrodynamics of CTFB reactors. It was found that the flow structure in the CTFB reactor differs significantly from conventional fast fluidized beds, exhibiting relatively weaker radial heterogeneity and attenuated near-wall particle downward flows. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the homogeneous drag models fail to predict reasonable hydrodynamics consistent with the experiments. In contrast, the mesoscale drag models show satisfactory performance in reproducing solid concentration profiles, while additional marker variables should be considered in the drag models to enhance the prediction accuracy of particle velocity. The EMMS-based drag model with an advanced conservation equation for cluster size achieves better accuracy in predicting both solid concentration and velocity distributions. Nevertheless, future model development should address wall boundary effects to enhance mesoscale drag applicability in CTFB simulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":401,"journal":{"name":"Particuology","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 302-312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Particuology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674200125001932","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The novel circulating turbulent fluidized bed (CTFB) technology has found wide applications in various processes owing to its high solid circulation rate and low backmixing. However, up to now, only a limited number of CFD simulation studies on this type of reactor can be found in the literature. Moreover, there is currently no guidance available for selecting appropriate subgrid drag models that take into account the impact of mesoscale structures. In this work, a two-fluid model incorporating seven different drag models include homogeneous drag models, filtered models, and EMMS-based drag models was employed to conduct a systematic investigation into the hydrodynamics of CTFB reactors. It was found that the flow structure in the CTFB reactor differs significantly from conventional fast fluidized beds, exhibiting relatively weaker radial heterogeneity and attenuated near-wall particle downward flows. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the homogeneous drag models fail to predict reasonable hydrodynamics consistent with the experiments. In contrast, the mesoscale drag models show satisfactory performance in reproducing solid concentration profiles, while additional marker variables should be considered in the drag models to enhance the prediction accuracy of particle velocity. The EMMS-based drag model with an advanced conservation equation for cluster size achieves better accuracy in predicting both solid concentration and velocity distributions. Nevertheless, future model development should address wall boundary effects to enhance mesoscale drag applicability in CTFB simulations.
期刊介绍:
The word ‘particuology’ was coined to parallel the discipline for the science and technology of particles.
Particuology is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes frontier research articles and critical reviews on the discovery, formulation and engineering of particulate materials, processes and systems. It especially welcomes contributions utilising advanced theoretical, modelling and measurement methods to enable the discovery and creation of new particulate materials, and the manufacturing of functional particulate-based products, such as sensors.
Papers are handled by Thematic Editors who oversee contributions from specific subject fields. These fields are classified into: Particle Synthesis and Modification; Particle Characterization and Measurement; Granular Systems and Bulk Solids Technology; Fluidization and Particle-Fluid Systems; Aerosols; and Applications of Particle Technology.
Key topics concerning the creation and processing of particulates include:
-Modelling and simulation of particle formation, collective behaviour of particles and systems for particle production over a broad spectrum of length scales
-Mining of experimental data for particle synthesis and surface properties to facilitate the creation of new materials and processes
-Particle design and preparation including controlled response and sensing functionalities in formation, delivery systems and biological systems, etc.
-Experimental and computational methods for visualization and analysis of particulate system.
These topics are broadly relevant to the production of materials, pharmaceuticals and food, and to the conversion of energy resources to fuels and protection of the environment.