Henry Sebastian Rangel-Quinonez , Riccardo Vecchio , Luisa Fernanda Arenas-Estevez
{"title":"Impact of new octagonal front-of-pack labeling on purchasing probability of processed and ultra-processed foods in Colombia","authors":"Henry Sebastian Rangel-Quinonez , Riccardo Vecchio , Luisa Fernanda Arenas-Estevez","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) has emerged as a key public health tool to inform consumers about the nutritional quality of foods and encourage healthier purchasing decisions. Among the various FOPL systems implemented worldwide, warning labels have gained prominence in Latin America due to their effectiveness in discouraging the consumption of unhealthy products. This study evaluates the impact of black octagonal front-of-pack warning labels (FOPL), introduced by Resolution 254 of 2023 in Colombia, on consumer purchasing intentions for processed and ultra-processed foods. Through an online experimental survey involving 490 food shoppers, 22 commercially available products were evaluated with and without the new labeling. The research examines the relationship between the number of warning labels and purchase probability, as well as the role of individual factors. The findings demonstrate a significant reduction in purchase probability for 20 of the 22 evaluated foods, with an additive effect of the number of labels. Products with four labels showed the largest impact (Cohen's <em>d</em> = 0.34), while those with a single label exhibited minimal changes (Cohen's <em>d</em> = 0.17). Greater label sensitivity was observed among participants with higher education levels and greater familiarity with nutritional labeling. Additionally, a marginally significant inverse relationship was found between product price and the change in purchase probability. These findings offer early evidence on the effectiveness of the Colombian FOPL policy under ecologically valid conditions, and highlight the importance of complementary strategies to enhance its impact across different consumer segments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 105640"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002150","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) has emerged as a key public health tool to inform consumers about the nutritional quality of foods and encourage healthier purchasing decisions. Among the various FOPL systems implemented worldwide, warning labels have gained prominence in Latin America due to their effectiveness in discouraging the consumption of unhealthy products. This study evaluates the impact of black octagonal front-of-pack warning labels (FOPL), introduced by Resolution 254 of 2023 in Colombia, on consumer purchasing intentions for processed and ultra-processed foods. Through an online experimental survey involving 490 food shoppers, 22 commercially available products were evaluated with and without the new labeling. The research examines the relationship between the number of warning labels and purchase probability, as well as the role of individual factors. The findings demonstrate a significant reduction in purchase probability for 20 of the 22 evaluated foods, with an additive effect of the number of labels. Products with four labels showed the largest impact (Cohen's d = 0.34), while those with a single label exhibited minimal changes (Cohen's d = 0.17). Greater label sensitivity was observed among participants with higher education levels and greater familiarity with nutritional labeling. Additionally, a marginally significant inverse relationship was found between product price and the change in purchase probability. These findings offer early evidence on the effectiveness of the Colombian FOPL policy under ecologically valid conditions, and highlight the importance of complementary strategies to enhance its impact across different consumer segments.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.