Diabetes body project eating disorder prevention program-Descriptive content analysis of participant and facilitator feedback in a multinational randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.4
Severina Haugvik, Shiraz Harel, Heather Shaw, Maartje de Wit, Elena Toschi, Mareille H C L Hennekes, Torild Skrivarhaug, Knut Dahl-Jørgensen, Eric Stice, Line Wisting
{"title":"Diabetes body project eating disorder prevention program-Descriptive content analysis of participant and facilitator feedback in a multinational randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Severina Haugvik, Shiraz Harel, Heather Shaw, Maartje de Wit, Elena Toschi, Mareille H C L Hennekes, Torild Skrivarhaug, Knut Dahl-Jørgensen, Eric Stice, Line Wisting","doi":"10.1111/dme.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine and describe feedback after participation in a novel eating disorder prevention program for young women with type 1 diabetes (Diabetes Body Project) in a multinational randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Written feedback from participants (N = 109) and facilitators (N = 19) at four sites (Europe and US) was analysed using descriptive, manifest content analysis. Open-ended questions included motivation for participation, most/less valuable aspects of the program and suggestions for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>\"Community\" was the most important motivator and most valued aspect, reported by one-third of participants. When asked about less valued aspects of the program, participants and facilitators most frequently reported \"none/not sure/everything was valuable\" and \"nothing\" respectively. Suggestions to improve the program common for participants and facilitators were \"more creative exercises\", specific for participants after \"none\" was \"limit homework/obligations\" and specific for facilitators was \"more flexibility to move away from the script\". The three most frequently perceived barriers for participation reported by participants and facilitators were \"requiring personal vulnerability\", \"time and energy constraints\" and the \"group setting\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants and facilitators expressed overall high satisfaction with the program, specifically the value of T1D community. Additionally, they suggested incorporating more creative exercises. Future research should aim at widespread implementation and addressing barriers to participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520603,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","volume":" ","pages":"e70108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To examine and describe feedback after participation in a novel eating disorder prevention program for young women with type 1 diabetes (Diabetes Body Project) in a multinational randomised controlled trial.

Methods: Written feedback from participants (N = 109) and facilitators (N = 19) at four sites (Europe and US) was analysed using descriptive, manifest content analysis. Open-ended questions included motivation for participation, most/less valuable aspects of the program and suggestions for improvement.

Results: "Community" was the most important motivator and most valued aspect, reported by one-third of participants. When asked about less valued aspects of the program, participants and facilitators most frequently reported "none/not sure/everything was valuable" and "nothing" respectively. Suggestions to improve the program common for participants and facilitators were "more creative exercises", specific for participants after "none" was "limit homework/obligations" and specific for facilitators was "more flexibility to move away from the script". The three most frequently perceived barriers for participation reported by participants and facilitators were "requiring personal vulnerability", "time and energy constraints" and the "group setting".

Conclusions: Participants and facilitators expressed overall high satisfaction with the program, specifically the value of T1D community. Additionally, they suggested incorporating more creative exercises. Future research should aim at widespread implementation and addressing barriers to participation.

糖尿病体项目饮食失调预防项目:多国随机对照试验中参与者和促进者反馈的描述性内容分析。
目的:在一项多国随机对照试验中,检查和描述参与一项针对1型糖尿病年轻女性的新型饮食失调预防计划(糖尿病体项目)后的反馈。方法:采用描述性、显性内容分析的方法,对来自欧洲和美国4个地点的参与者(109人)和主持人(19人)的书面反馈进行分析。开放式问题包括参与动机、项目最有价值的方面和改进建议。结果:三分之一的参与者表示,“社区”是最重要的激励因素和最受重视的方面。当被问及项目中不太有价值的方面时,参与者和主持人最常见的回答分别是“没有/不确定/一切都有价值”和“没有”。参与者和主持人共同提出的改进建议是“更有创意的练习”,“没有”后针对参与者的建议是“限制家庭作业/义务”,针对主持人的建议是“更灵活地摆脱剧本”。参与者和辅导员报告的三个最常见的参与障碍是“需要个人脆弱性”、“时间和精力限制”和“群体环境”。结论:参与者和主持人对该项目总体上表达了很高的满意度,特别是对T1D社区的价值。此外,他们建议加入更多的创造性练习。今后的研究应着眼于广泛实施和解决参与的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信