Acceptability of and preferences for long-acting injectable hormonal contraception among US women: evidence from a national cross-sectional online survey.

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ann Gottert, Timothy Abuya, Elizabeth Proos, Isabella Johnson, Nathan H Dormer, Ulrike Foley, Grace Saul, Lisa B Haddad, David R Friend
{"title":"Acceptability of and preferences for long-acting injectable hormonal contraception among US women: evidence from a national cross-sectional online survey.","authors":"Ann Gottert, Timothy Abuya, Elizabeth Proos, Isabella Johnson, Nathan H Dormer, Ulrike Foley, Grace Saul, Lisa B Haddad, David R Friend","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00380-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-acting injectable (LAI) hormonal contraception offers a promising approach to meet women's pregnancy prevention needs. We sought to understand acceptability of and preferences for LAI hormonal contraception among US women, to optimize the design of a sustained-release LAI in development - including which durations to pursue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a national cross-sectional online survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with women ages 18-44 years currently using or interested in using contraception. Recruitment was via Prime Panels. DCE attributes included potential duration of effectiveness (6/12/24-months), effect on menses, side effects, and timing of return-to-fertility after use. We used mixed-multinomial logit models to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women (n = 1,029) were 28.6 years old on-average, from 49 US states. 30.9% were Black/African American; 11.6% Hispanic/Latina. 71.6% were nulliparous; 49.0% did not want a(nother) child. Common current contraceptive methods were birth control pills (37.4%), male condoms (35.7%), and withdrawal (19.8%); 18.9% reported having had an unintended pregnancy. In the DCE, women had strong negative preferences for: may cause heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, and delayed return-to-fertility (6-12 vs. 3 months), and positive preferences for: may cause no period, and shorter/lighter periods (all p < 0.001). Women also preferred the 12-month to the 6-month duration (p = 0.03). When asked directly about their interest in an LAI with no/minimal side effects/effects on menses and quick return-to-fertility, 92.4% expressed interest, with two-thirds preferring a longer duration (12 or 24-months), and one-third the 6-month duration. Preference for the 6-month duration (vs. 12 or 24) was most highly associated with wanting a child within five years, and higher discomfort with hormones (both p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>US women report high interest in an LAI. Interest substantially decreases if the LAI may cause unwanted effects such as heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, or delayed return-to-fertility. While longer duration (12 + months) is preferred overall, having a 6-month option appears important especially for women who may want to get pregnant within the next few years, and those concerned about hormones (to try it before using a longer duration).</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00380-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-acting injectable (LAI) hormonal contraception offers a promising approach to meet women's pregnancy prevention needs. We sought to understand acceptability of and preferences for LAI hormonal contraception among US women, to optimize the design of a sustained-release LAI in development - including which durations to pursue.

Methods: We implemented a national cross-sectional online survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with women ages 18-44 years currently using or interested in using contraception. Recruitment was via Prime Panels. DCE attributes included potential duration of effectiveness (6/12/24-months), effect on menses, side effects, and timing of return-to-fertility after use. We used mixed-multinomial logit models to analyze the data.

Results: Women (n = 1,029) were 28.6 years old on-average, from 49 US states. 30.9% were Black/African American; 11.6% Hispanic/Latina. 71.6% were nulliparous; 49.0% did not want a(nother) child. Common current contraceptive methods were birth control pills (37.4%), male condoms (35.7%), and withdrawal (19.8%); 18.9% reported having had an unintended pregnancy. In the DCE, women had strong negative preferences for: may cause heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, and delayed return-to-fertility (6-12 vs. 3 months), and positive preferences for: may cause no period, and shorter/lighter periods (all p < 0.001). Women also preferred the 12-month to the 6-month duration (p = 0.03). When asked directly about their interest in an LAI with no/minimal side effects/effects on menses and quick return-to-fertility, 92.4% expressed interest, with two-thirds preferring a longer duration (12 or 24-months), and one-third the 6-month duration. Preference for the 6-month duration (vs. 12 or 24) was most highly associated with wanting a child within five years, and higher discomfort with hormones (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: US women report high interest in an LAI. Interest substantially decreases if the LAI may cause unwanted effects such as heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, or delayed return-to-fertility. While longer duration (12 + months) is preferred overall, having a 6-month option appears important especially for women who may want to get pregnant within the next few years, and those concerned about hormones (to try it before using a longer duration).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美国妇女对长效注射激素避孕的可接受性和偏好:来自全国横断面在线调查的证据。
背景:长效注射(LAI)激素避孕是满足妇女预防妊娠需求的一种有希望的方法。我们试图了解美国女性对LAI激素避孕的可接受性和偏好,以优化开发中的持续释放LAI的设计-包括追求的持续时间。方法:我们实施了一项全国性的横断面在线调查,包括离散选择实验(DCE),调查对象是年龄在18-44岁之间正在使用或有兴趣使用避孕措施的女性。招聘是通过Prime Panels进行的。DCE属性包括潜在的有效持续时间(6/12/24个月)、对月经的影响、副作用和使用后恢复生育能力的时间。我们使用混合多项logit模型来分析数据。结果:女性(n = 1029)平均年龄28.6岁,来自美国49个州。30.9%为黑人/非裔美国人;11.6%的西班牙裔或拉丁裔。未生育的占71.6%;49.0%的人不想要(第二个)孩子。目前常见的避孕方法为口服避孕药(37.4%)、男用避孕套(35.7%)和停药(19.8%);18.9%的人报告有过意外怀孕。在DCE中,女性有强烈的负面偏好:可能导致更重/不可预测的月经,轻度头痛/恶心,轻微体重增加,延迟恢复生育(6-12个月vs. 3个月),积极偏好:可能导致无月经,更短/更轻的月经(所有p结论:美国女性对LAI有很高的兴趣。如果LAI可能引起不希望的影响,如较重/不可预测的月经,轻度头痛/恶心,轻微的体重增加,或延迟恢复生育能力,兴趣就会大大降低。虽然更长的持续时间(12个月以上)是首选,但有6个月的选择似乎很重要,特别是对于那些可能想在未来几年内怀孕的女性,以及那些担心激素的女性(在使用更长的持续时间之前尝试一下)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信