Understanding difficult-to-treat psoriatic arthritis: data from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Catarina Abreu, Vanessa Fraga, Sara Dias Rodrigues, Laura Gago, Susana Almeida, Catarina Dantas Soares, Maria Pontes Ferreira, Carlos Gomes, Mariana Diz-Lopes, Miguel Bernardes, João Menezes, Carolina Ochôa Matos, Elsa Vieira-Sousa, Tiago Beirão, João Oliveira, Mariana Luís, Rodrigo Rei, Rafaela Nicolau, Cláudia Pinto Oliveira, Carolina Vilafanha, Rita Vieira, Ana Teresa Melo, Lígia Silva, João Lagoas Gomes, Filipe Araújo, Patrícia Nero, Paula Valente, Marina Oliveira, Alice Morais Castro, Maria José Santos
{"title":"Understanding difficult-to-treat psoriatic arthritis: data from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry.","authors":"Catarina Abreu, Vanessa Fraga, Sara Dias Rodrigues, Laura Gago, Susana Almeida, Catarina Dantas Soares, Maria Pontes Ferreira, Carlos Gomes, Mariana Diz-Lopes, Miguel Bernardes, João Menezes, Carolina Ochôa Matos, Elsa Vieira-Sousa, Tiago Beirão, João Oliveira, Mariana Luís, Rodrigo Rei, Rafaela Nicolau, Cláudia Pinto Oliveira, Carolina Vilafanha, Rita Vieira, Ana Teresa Melo, Lígia Silva, João Lagoas Gomes, Filipe Araújo, Patrícia Nero, Paula Valente, Marina Oliveira, Alice Morais Castro, Maria José Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.jbspin.2025.105949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the proportion and identify predictors of difficult-to-treat (D2T) psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre observational retrospective study was conducted with patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry (Reuma.pt). Two different definitions were used to classify D2T PsA. The first criterion (treatment failure) is defined by the failure of ≥2 b/tsDMARDs (first definition) or ≥3 b/tsDMARDs (second definition), both with different MoAs; and the second criterion is defined by the presence of signs suggestive of active/progressive disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1873 patients were included, of whom 3.7% (n=70) were classified as having D2T PsA according to the first definition and 0.9% (n=17) as having D2T PsA according to the second definition. D2T PsA was associated with a younger age at symptom onset (37.5±11.0 vs 41.4±12.8; p<0.01) and at diagnosis (40.7±10.5 vs 44.7±12.3; p<0.01), polyarticular phenotype (77.6% vs 53.6%; p<0.001), depression (10.9% vs 5%; p<0.05), and enthesitis (47.1% vs 33.5%; p<0.05) and lower body mass index (26.5(6.1) vs 27.7(6.1); p<0.01). D2T PsA patients presented with higher tender (13.4(14.5) vs 6(8); p<0.001) and swollen joint counts (9(9) vs 4(6); p<0.001) and higher DAPSA (38.2(31.6) vs 25.4(15.6); p<0.001) at baseline. Polyarticular disease (OR 3.09), increased baseline swollen joint count (OR 1.12), and treatment duration on the first b/tsDMARDs (p<0.01) were predictors of D2T PsA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>D2T PsA proportions varied between 0.9% and 3.7%. D2T PsA patients had higher disease activity scores before the initiation of their first b/tsDMARDs and higher rates of treatment discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54902,"journal":{"name":"Joint Bone Spine","volume":" ","pages":"105949"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Bone Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2025.105949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the proportion and identify predictors of difficult-to-treat (D2T) psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: A multicentre observational retrospective study was conducted with patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry (Reuma.pt). Two different definitions were used to classify D2T PsA. The first criterion (treatment failure) is defined by the failure of ≥2 b/tsDMARDs (first definition) or ≥3 b/tsDMARDs (second definition), both with different MoAs; and the second criterion is defined by the presence of signs suggestive of active/progressive disease.

Results: 1873 patients were included, of whom 3.7% (n=70) were classified as having D2T PsA according to the first definition and 0.9% (n=17) as having D2T PsA according to the second definition. D2T PsA was associated with a younger age at symptom onset (37.5±11.0 vs 41.4±12.8; p<0.01) and at diagnosis (40.7±10.5 vs 44.7±12.3; p<0.01), polyarticular phenotype (77.6% vs 53.6%; p<0.001), depression (10.9% vs 5%; p<0.05), and enthesitis (47.1% vs 33.5%; p<0.05) and lower body mass index (26.5(6.1) vs 27.7(6.1); p<0.01). D2T PsA patients presented with higher tender (13.4(14.5) vs 6(8); p<0.001) and swollen joint counts (9(9) vs 4(6); p<0.001) and higher DAPSA (38.2(31.6) vs 25.4(15.6); p<0.001) at baseline. Polyarticular disease (OR 3.09), increased baseline swollen joint count (OR 1.12), and treatment duration on the first b/tsDMARDs (p<0.01) were predictors of D2T PsA.

Conclusion: D2T PsA proportions varied between 0.9% and 3.7%. D2T PsA patients had higher disease activity scores before the initiation of their first b/tsDMARDs and higher rates of treatment discontinuation.

了解难治性银屑病关节炎:来自葡萄牙风湿病登记处的数据。
目的:估计难以治疗(D2T)银屑病关节炎(PsA)的比例并确定预测因素。方法:对在葡萄牙风湿病登记处(Reuma.pt)登记的患者进行多中心观察性回顾性研究。两种不同的定义用于分类D2T PsA。第一个标准(治疗失败)定义为失败≥2 b/ tsdmard(第一定义)或≥3 b/ tsdmard(第二定义),两者具有不同的moa;第二个标准是通过存在提示活动性/进行性疾病的迹象来定义的。结果:纳入1873例患者,其中3.7% (n=70)为第一种定义的D2T PsA, 0.9% (n=17)为第二种定义的D2T PsA。D2T PsA与发病年龄较轻相关(37.5±11.0 vs 41.4±12.8;结论:D2T PsA比例在0.9% ~ 3.7%之间。D2T PsA患者在开始第一次b/ tsdmard治疗前具有较高的疾病活动性评分和较高的停药率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Joint Bone Spine
Joint Bone Spine 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Bimonthly e-only international journal, Joint Bone Spine publishes in English original research articles and all the latest advances that deal with disorders affecting the joints, bones, and spine and, more generally, the entire field of rheumatology. All submitted manuscripts to the journal are subjected to rigorous peer review by international experts: under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. (Surgical techniques and work focusing specifically on orthopedic surgery are not within the scope of the journal.)Joint Bone Spine is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信