Inequality in Exposure and Knowledge Drives Vulnerability to Rat-Associated Leptospirosis.

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alexandre Dyer, Kaylee A Byers, Jacqueline Buckley, Danielle German, Maureen H Murray
{"title":"Inequality in Exposure and Knowledge Drives Vulnerability to Rat-Associated Leptospirosis.","authors":"Alexandre Dyer, Kaylee A Byers, Jacqueline Buckley, Danielle German, Maureen H Murray","doi":"10.1007/s10393-025-01735-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To predict and prevent public health risks from urban rats, studies often examine zoonotic pathogen prevalence in rats in different urban environments. However, human exposure to rats and their awareness of the associated risks are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with two aspects of vulnerability to leptospirosis as a model rat-associated disease: (1) exposure to rat urine in the home and (2) lack of awareness that rats carry leptospirosis. To collect data on residents' experiences and knowledge about rats, we mailed a survey to randomly selected households along an income gradient in Chicago. Of 432 complete cases, 36% had observed rat urine in the home and 73% were unaware that rats carry leptospirosis. Using logistic regression, we found that non-white respondents had over three times higher odds of observing rat urine in the home than white respondents. Dog owners and respondents who sought out information about rats, regardless of source, were more likely to be aware that rats carry leptospirosis. When we examined both aspects of vulnerability simultaneously using multinomial regression, we found that residents most vulnerable to leptospirosis (who had been exposed to urine and were not aware that rats carry leptospirosis) were significantly less likely to be white and less likely to be dog owners. Our results suggest that more public education is needed about rat-associated diseases spread through feces and urine and that exposure to rats should be considered another environmental health burden that is disproportionately persistent in underserved communities of color.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-025-01735-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To predict and prevent public health risks from urban rats, studies often examine zoonotic pathogen prevalence in rats in different urban environments. However, human exposure to rats and their awareness of the associated risks are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with two aspects of vulnerability to leptospirosis as a model rat-associated disease: (1) exposure to rat urine in the home and (2) lack of awareness that rats carry leptospirosis. To collect data on residents' experiences and knowledge about rats, we mailed a survey to randomly selected households along an income gradient in Chicago. Of 432 complete cases, 36% had observed rat urine in the home and 73% were unaware that rats carry leptospirosis. Using logistic regression, we found that non-white respondents had over three times higher odds of observing rat urine in the home than white respondents. Dog owners and respondents who sought out information about rats, regardless of source, were more likely to be aware that rats carry leptospirosis. When we examined both aspects of vulnerability simultaneously using multinomial regression, we found that residents most vulnerable to leptospirosis (who had been exposed to urine and were not aware that rats carry leptospirosis) were significantly less likely to be white and less likely to be dog owners. Our results suggest that more public education is needed about rat-associated diseases spread through feces and urine and that exposure to rats should be considered another environmental health burden that is disproportionately persistent in underserved communities of color.

暴露和知识的不平等导致对大鼠相关钩端螺旋体病的易感性。
为了预测和预防来自城市老鼠的公共卫生风险,研究经常检查不同城市环境中老鼠的人畜共患病原体流行情况。然而,人类与老鼠的接触以及他们对相关风险的认识却知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定与钩端螺旋体病易感的两个方面相关的因素:(1)在家中暴露于大鼠尿液;(2)缺乏对大鼠携带钩端螺旋体病的认识。为了收集居民对老鼠的经验和知识,我们向芝加哥按收入梯度随机选择的家庭邮寄了一份调查问卷。在432例完整病例中,36%在家中观察到大鼠尿液,73%不知道大鼠携带钩端螺旋体病。使用逻辑回归,我们发现非白人受访者在家中观察到大鼠尿液的几率是白人受访者的三倍以上。无论来源如何,狗主人和寻找有关老鼠信息的受访者更有可能意识到老鼠携带钩端螺旋体病。当我们使用多项回归同时检查脆弱性的两个方面时,我们发现最容易受到钩端螺旋体病的居民(暴露于尿液并且不知道老鼠携带钩端螺旋体病)明显不太可能是白人,也不太可能是狗主人。我们的研究结果表明,需要对通过粪便和尿液传播的老鼠相关疾病进行更多的公众教育,并且暴露于老鼠应该被视为另一种环境健康负担,这种负担在服务不足的有色人种社区中持续存在得不成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohealth
Ecohealth 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity. The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas: One Health and Conservation Medicine o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems Ecosystem Approaches to Health o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信