Priority Setting of Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators Among Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nominal Group Technique Study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Manuel Ester, Kiran Dhiman, Racheal Githumbi, Melissa Sipley, Kamala Adhikari Dahal, Claire E H Barber
{"title":"Priority Setting of Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators Among Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nominal Group Technique Study.","authors":"Manuel Ester, Kiran Dhiman, Racheal Githumbi, Melissa Sipley, Kamala Adhikari Dahal, Claire E H Barber","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To (1) understand key physical activity (PA) determinants for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and (2) map determinants using the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) to guide theory-driven intervention development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A patient-centered nominal group technique (NGT) approach was used, with recruitment through purposive sampling from past research participants. After self-reporting demographics and PA, participants attended NGT sessions consisting of idea generation, sharing, and refinement through discussion. Researchers combined PA-determinant lists across sessions using content analysis. Using a survey, participants rated the importance of each determinant from 1 to 9. Theoretical mapping was completed with the most important 2 out of 3 determinants using the BCW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen individuals participated across 3 sessions. The mean age was 58.1 (SD 13.4) years, with a mean 20.0 (SD 21.8) years with RA. Participants were 86% female, 79% White, and 86% had some university/college education. All participants were physically active, with a mean Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) leisure score index of 43.3 (SD 18.4; < 14 = insufficiently active, 14-24 = moderately active, > 24 = active). The 22 PA barriers and 25 facilitators fell into 4 categories: personal, social, physical, and environmental. The top 3 barriers (importance: 7.1-7.4/9) were unpredictable fluctuations, fatigue, and lack of RA-specific PA knowledge. The top 3 facilitators (importance: 7.6-7.9/9) were motivation to maintain function, knowledge to tailor PA, and PA self-confidence. Theoretical mapping led to 3 capability-related, 6 opportunity-related, and 4 motivation-related determinants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlighted key PA determinants related to capability, opportunity, and motivation. Interventions may target skills (capability), social influences (opportunity), and beliefs about capabilities (motivation) to increase PA in individuals with RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"979-987"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To (1) understand key physical activity (PA) determinants for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and (2) map determinants using the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) to guide theory-driven intervention development.

Methods: A patient-centered nominal group technique (NGT) approach was used, with recruitment through purposive sampling from past research participants. After self-reporting demographics and PA, participants attended NGT sessions consisting of idea generation, sharing, and refinement through discussion. Researchers combined PA-determinant lists across sessions using content analysis. Using a survey, participants rated the importance of each determinant from 1 to 9. Theoretical mapping was completed with the most important 2 out of 3 determinants using the BCW.

Results: Fourteen individuals participated across 3 sessions. The mean age was 58.1 (SD 13.4) years, with a mean 20.0 (SD 21.8) years with RA. Participants were 86% female, 79% White, and 86% had some university/college education. All participants were physically active, with a mean Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) leisure score index of 43.3 (SD 18.4; < 14 = insufficiently active, 14-24 = moderately active, > 24 = active). The 22 PA barriers and 25 facilitators fell into 4 categories: personal, social, physical, and environmental. The top 3 barriers (importance: 7.1-7.4/9) were unpredictable fluctuations, fatigue, and lack of RA-specific PA knowledge. The top 3 facilitators (importance: 7.6-7.9/9) were motivation to maintain function, knowledge to tailor PA, and PA self-confidence. Theoretical mapping led to 3 capability-related, 6 opportunity-related, and 4 motivation-related determinants.

Conclusion: Our study highlighted key PA determinants related to capability, opportunity, and motivation. Interventions may target skills (capability), social influences (opportunity), and beliefs about capabilities (motivation) to increase PA in individuals with RA.

类风湿关节炎患者身体活动障碍和促进因素的优先设置:一项名义组技术研究。
目的:(1)了解类风湿关节炎(RA)个体的关键身体活动(PA)决定因素;(2)利用行为改变轮(BCW)绘制决定因素图,以指导理论驱动的干预开发。方法:采用以患者为中心的名义群体技术(NGT)方法,通过有目的的抽样从过去的研究参与者中招募。在自我报告人口统计和PA之后,参与者参加了NGT会议,包括想法产生,分享和通过讨论进行改进。研究人员使用内容分析将PA决定因素列表组合在一起。通过一项调查,参与者将每个决定因素的重要性从1到9打分。使用BCW完成了最重要的2/3决定因素的理论映射。结果:14个人参加了3个疗程。平均年龄58.1±13.4岁,RA组平均年龄20.0±21.8岁。参与者中85.7%为女性,78.6%为白人,85.7%为大学学历。所有参与者均为体力活动,平均休闲得分指数为43.3±18.4(24 =活跃)。22个PA障碍和25个促进因素分为4类:个人、社会、物理和环境。前3个障碍(重要性:7.1-7.4/9)是不可预测的波动、疲劳和缺乏ra特异性PA知识。前3位促进因素(重要性:7.6-7.9/9)分别是维持功能的动机、PA裁剪知识和PA自信。理论映射得出3个与能力相关的决定因素,6个与机会相关的决定因素和4个与动机相关的决定因素。结论:我们的研究突出了与能力、机会和动机相关的关键PA决定因素。干预措施可以针对技能(能力)、社会影响(机会)和对能力的信念(动机)来增加RA的PA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信