Efficacy of Oral Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline in Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

IF 0.2 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ashesh Koirala, Samiksha Bhattarai, Sangeeta Shah, Bhuwan Govind Shrestha, Poonam Lavaju
{"title":"Efficacy of Oral Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline in Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.","authors":"Ashesh Koirala, Samiksha Bhattarai, Sangeeta Shah, Bhuwan Govind Shrestha, Poonam Lavaju","doi":"10.3126/nepjoph.v16i1.46383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is usually treated with conservative methods. Adjunct therapy with oral Doxycycline has played a vital role in its treatment. Recently Azithromycin has also been introduced as a newer agent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy, safety and compliance of oral azithromycin with doxycycline over one year period in patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A randomised comparative clinical trial was performed among 284 subjects (age >35 years) with MGD. They were randomly divided into two groups A and B. Along with standard conservative management, Group A received oral 9-day azithromycin (500 mg for 3 consecutive days for 3 consecutive weeks) and group B received 14 days doxycycline (200 mg/day). A score comprising seven symptoms and seven signs (primary outcome) was recorded before and at first and second follow up after treatment and further analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean symptoms and signs treated by Azithromycin group was lesser as compared to Doxycycline group in the first follow up (p <0.001). However it was statistically insignificant at second follow-up (p=0.043). The group taking azithromycin had a much better overall response (p = 0.006). Gastrointestinal symptoms were the major side effects encountered, the group taking doxycycline experienced significantly more side effects (p ≤0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both antibiotics were effective and safe for treating persistent MGD, but azithromycin was more effective. It required a lower dose, worked faster, and had a shorter treatment duration compared to doxycycline.</p>","PeriodicalId":44759,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"16 31","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v16i1.46383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is usually treated with conservative methods. Adjunct therapy with oral Doxycycline has played a vital role in its treatment. Recently Azithromycin has also been introduced as a newer agent.

Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and compliance of oral azithromycin with doxycycline over one year period in patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

Methodology: A randomised comparative clinical trial was performed among 284 subjects (age >35 years) with MGD. They were randomly divided into two groups A and B. Along with standard conservative management, Group A received oral 9-day azithromycin (500 mg for 3 consecutive days for 3 consecutive weeks) and group B received 14 days doxycycline (200 mg/day). A score comprising seven symptoms and seven signs (primary outcome) was recorded before and at first and second follow up after treatment and further analyzed.

Result: The mean symptoms and signs treated by Azithromycin group was lesser as compared to Doxycycline group in the first follow up (p <0.001). However it was statistically insignificant at second follow-up (p=0.043). The group taking azithromycin had a much better overall response (p = 0.006). Gastrointestinal symptoms were the major side effects encountered, the group taking doxycycline experienced significantly more side effects (p ≤0.001).

Conclusion: Both antibiotics were effective and safe for treating persistent MGD, but azithromycin was more effective. It required a lower dose, worked faster, and had a shorter treatment duration compared to doxycycline.

口服阿奇霉素与强力霉素治疗睑板腺功能障碍的疗效比较。
简介:睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)通常采用保守方法治疗。口服强力霉素辅助治疗在其治疗中起着至关重要的作用。最近,阿奇霉素也作为一种较新的药物被引入。目的:比较口服阿奇霉素与强力霉素治疗眉板腺功能障碍(MGD)患者1年的疗效、安全性和依从性。方法:一项随机对照临床试验在284例MGD患者中进行(年龄0 ~ 35岁)。随机分为A、B两组。在标准保守治疗的基础上,A组患者口服阿奇霉素9天(500 mg,连续3天,连续3周),B组患者口服强力霉素14天(200 mg/天)。在治疗前和治疗后第一次和第二次随访时记录由7个症状和7个体征(主要结局)组成的评分,并进一步分析。结果:与多西环素组相比,阿奇霉素组第一次随访的平均症状和体征减轻(p)。结论:两种抗生素治疗持续性MGD均有效且安全,但阿奇霉素更有效。与强力霉素相比,它需要更低的剂量,起效更快,治疗持续时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信