{"title":"Efficacy of Oral Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline in Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.","authors":"Ashesh Koirala, Samiksha Bhattarai, Sangeeta Shah, Bhuwan Govind Shrestha, Poonam Lavaju","doi":"10.3126/nepjoph.v16i1.46383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is usually treated with conservative methods. Adjunct therapy with oral Doxycycline has played a vital role in its treatment. Recently Azithromycin has also been introduced as a newer agent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy, safety and compliance of oral azithromycin with doxycycline over one year period in patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A randomised comparative clinical trial was performed among 284 subjects (age >35 years) with MGD. They were randomly divided into two groups A and B. Along with standard conservative management, Group A received oral 9-day azithromycin (500 mg for 3 consecutive days for 3 consecutive weeks) and group B received 14 days doxycycline (200 mg/day). A score comprising seven symptoms and seven signs (primary outcome) was recorded before and at first and second follow up after treatment and further analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean symptoms and signs treated by Azithromycin group was lesser as compared to Doxycycline group in the first follow up (p <0.001). However it was statistically insignificant at second follow-up (p=0.043). The group taking azithromycin had a much better overall response (p = 0.006). Gastrointestinal symptoms were the major side effects encountered, the group taking doxycycline experienced significantly more side effects (p ≤0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both antibiotics were effective and safe for treating persistent MGD, but azithromycin was more effective. It required a lower dose, worked faster, and had a shorter treatment duration compared to doxycycline.</p>","PeriodicalId":44759,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"16 31","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v16i1.46383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is usually treated with conservative methods. Adjunct therapy with oral Doxycycline has played a vital role in its treatment. Recently Azithromycin has also been introduced as a newer agent.
Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and compliance of oral azithromycin with doxycycline over one year period in patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
Methodology: A randomised comparative clinical trial was performed among 284 subjects (age >35 years) with MGD. They were randomly divided into two groups A and B. Along with standard conservative management, Group A received oral 9-day azithromycin (500 mg for 3 consecutive days for 3 consecutive weeks) and group B received 14 days doxycycline (200 mg/day). A score comprising seven symptoms and seven signs (primary outcome) was recorded before and at first and second follow up after treatment and further analyzed.
Result: The mean symptoms and signs treated by Azithromycin group was lesser as compared to Doxycycline group in the first follow up (p <0.001). However it was statistically insignificant at second follow-up (p=0.043). The group taking azithromycin had a much better overall response (p = 0.006). Gastrointestinal symptoms were the major side effects encountered, the group taking doxycycline experienced significantly more side effects (p ≤0.001).
Conclusion: Both antibiotics were effective and safe for treating persistent MGD, but azithromycin was more effective. It required a lower dose, worked faster, and had a shorter treatment duration compared to doxycycline.