{"title":"Translation and validation of the Dari version of the hospital survey on patient safety culture for healthcare settings in Afghanistan.","authors":"Javad Moghri, Jamshid Jamali, Laleh Satarzadeh","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-13461-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient safety culture (PSC) is a critical determinant of healthcare quality, as it influences error reduction and clinical outcomes. The hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPSC), a globally validated tool for assessing PSC, was translated and validated in Afghanistan a setting facing unique healthcare challenges, including resource constraints and a fragmented healthcare system. The translation adhered to WHO guidelines, involving forward-backward translation, expert review, and pilot testing with nurses and midwives at one of Afghanistan's largest hospitals, located in the capital city. Psychometric evaluations included face, content, and construct validity. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach's α, Omega coefficients) and test-retest reliability. The 42-item questionnaire demonstrated robust validity and reliability. Content Validity Index (CVI) scores ranged from 0.82 to 1.0, exceeding acceptable thresholds, while the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) ranged from 0.64 to 1.0, meeting required standards. Face validity was confirmed by an impact score > 1.5 (range 1.86-3.96). Two items from the Staffing dimension exhibited factor loadings below the recommended threshold of 0.4 and were removed, leading to the exclusion of this dimension (fewer than three retained items). Overall reliability was strong, with Cronbach's α = 0.848 and Omega = 0.841. The validated Dari version of the HSOPSC comprises 11 dimensions after removing Staffing. It demonstrates good validity and reliability, establishing its suitability for patient safety research in Afghanistan.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"27277"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12297310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13461-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patient safety culture (PSC) is a critical determinant of healthcare quality, as it influences error reduction and clinical outcomes. The hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPSC), a globally validated tool for assessing PSC, was translated and validated in Afghanistan a setting facing unique healthcare challenges, including resource constraints and a fragmented healthcare system. The translation adhered to WHO guidelines, involving forward-backward translation, expert review, and pilot testing with nurses and midwives at one of Afghanistan's largest hospitals, located in the capital city. Psychometric evaluations included face, content, and construct validity. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach's α, Omega coefficients) and test-retest reliability. The 42-item questionnaire demonstrated robust validity and reliability. Content Validity Index (CVI) scores ranged from 0.82 to 1.0, exceeding acceptable thresholds, while the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) ranged from 0.64 to 1.0, meeting required standards. Face validity was confirmed by an impact score > 1.5 (range 1.86-3.96). Two items from the Staffing dimension exhibited factor loadings below the recommended threshold of 0.4 and were removed, leading to the exclusion of this dimension (fewer than three retained items). Overall reliability was strong, with Cronbach's α = 0.848 and Omega = 0.841. The validated Dari version of the HSOPSC comprises 11 dimensions after removing Staffing. It demonstrates good validity and reliability, establishing its suitability for patient safety research in Afghanistan.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.