{"title":"Corneal Staining Responder Analysis: A Clinically Meaningful Dry Eye Outcome.","authors":"Esen K Akpek, John D Sheppard, Sonja Krösser","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Thus far, clinical studies related to dry eye disease (DED) have focused on demonstrating a statistically significant difference in various ocular surface and tear film parameters and patient symptoms between the test arm versus comparator. However, it is largely unclear what arm differences or magnitude of improvement for a given parameter are clinically meaningful. This study aims to assess the correlations between corneal punctate erosions and patient reported symptoms and aims to define \"corneal staining responder\" as a physician measured and clinically meaningful DED outcome to be used in clinical studies and patient care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of previously published studies.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1704 adult patients with evaporative or aqueous deficient DED who participated in 4 large-scale randomized, controlled studies evaluating 2 different DED medications (a water-free cyclosporine 0.1 % solution and perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic solution) or their respective comparators (vehicle and saline solution).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Corneal punctate epithelial erosions were evaluated using fluorescein dye and the staining score was graded according to National Eye Institute scale (0-15). \"Corneal staining responder\" was defined as ≥ 3 grade improvement from baseline, based on published literature and expert opinion. A variety of patient symptoms were assessed using visual analogue scale (0-100).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Corneal staining responders were compared to non-responders regarding improvement in symptoms via ANCOVA analysis irrespective of the treatment received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all 4 studies corneal staining responders showed numerically greater improvement in all assessed DED symptoms compared to non-responders. Overall, 36 comparisons were performed involving 14 different DED symptoms. In 75% of the comparisons the magnitude of the symptom improvement in responders was statistically significantly greater compared to non-responders. This finding was consistent across all 4 studies, irrespective of the treatment applied, patient demographics and the severity or type of DED.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis demonstrates that ≥ 3 severity grade improvement in corneal staining score is consistently associated with significant corresponding symptom improvement and may represent a clinically meaningful DED outcome measure for clinical studies and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.07.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Thus far, clinical studies related to dry eye disease (DED) have focused on demonstrating a statistically significant difference in various ocular surface and tear film parameters and patient symptoms between the test arm versus comparator. However, it is largely unclear what arm differences or magnitude of improvement for a given parameter are clinically meaningful. This study aims to assess the correlations between corneal punctate erosions and patient reported symptoms and aims to define "corneal staining responder" as a physician measured and clinically meaningful DED outcome to be used in clinical studies and patient care.
Design: Retrospective analysis of previously published studies.
Participants: 1704 adult patients with evaporative or aqueous deficient DED who participated in 4 large-scale randomized, controlled studies evaluating 2 different DED medications (a water-free cyclosporine 0.1 % solution and perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic solution) or their respective comparators (vehicle and saline solution).
Methods: Corneal punctate epithelial erosions were evaluated using fluorescein dye and the staining score was graded according to National Eye Institute scale (0-15). "Corneal staining responder" was defined as ≥ 3 grade improvement from baseline, based on published literature and expert opinion. A variety of patient symptoms were assessed using visual analogue scale (0-100).
Main outcome measure: Corneal staining responders were compared to non-responders regarding improvement in symptoms via ANCOVA analysis irrespective of the treatment received.
Results: In all 4 studies corneal staining responders showed numerically greater improvement in all assessed DED symptoms compared to non-responders. Overall, 36 comparisons were performed involving 14 different DED symptoms. In 75% of the comparisons the magnitude of the symptom improvement in responders was statistically significantly greater compared to non-responders. This finding was consistent across all 4 studies, irrespective of the treatment applied, patient demographics and the severity or type of DED.
Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates that ≥ 3 severity grade improvement in corneal staining score is consistently associated with significant corresponding symptom improvement and may represent a clinically meaningful DED outcome measure for clinical studies and patient care.
期刊介绍:
The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.