Analysis of the Justification for Spinal Computed Tomography (CT) Scans Performed in Togo.

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kokou Adambounou, Komla Nyinèvi Anayo, Amara Youla, Kossivi Pierre Gbodjomé, Akoeté Beleave Kouevidjin, Gilles David Houndetoungan
{"title":"Analysis of the Justification for Spinal Computed Tomography (CT) Scans Performed in Togo.","authors":"Kokou Adambounou, Komla Nyinèvi Anayo, Amara Youla, Kossivi Pierre Gbodjomé, Akoeté Beleave Kouevidjin, Gilles David Houndetoungan","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The undeniable benefits of irradiating examinations such as computed tomography (CT) scans should not overshadow their potential harmful effects, particularly late risks. Hence, it is important to justify CT scans requested for patients. The aim of this study is to analyse the justification for CT scans in all health facilities with a functional medical scanner in Togo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective descriptive study of spinal CT scans performed between 1st June and 31st August 2021 and interpreted by a radiologist in seven functional CT units in Togo. The analysis of the justification was based in particular on the formulation of the clinical indication, the consistency of the clinical indication with the requested CT scan, and the compliance of the clinical indication with the Best Practice Guidelines of the Société Française de Radiologie (SFR) and the Société Française de Médecine Nucléaire (SFMN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 355 spinal CT scans included were exclusively cervical, dorsal and lumbar in 15.5%, 3.1% and 68.2% of the patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 48.2 years, with a sex ratio of 1.1:1.0. Approximately 69% of patients had a spinal CT scan within 3 days or less. Specialist (70.2%) and general practitioner (22.3%) were the most frequent requesters; 92.1% of the patients requested a non-radiating or less radiating imaging test before the CT scan. Non-physician staff (paramedics) accounted for 2.5% of requesters. The formulation of the clinical indication was good in 89.9%, acceptable in 7.6% and wrong in 2.5% of the patients. These indications were consistent with the examination requested in 98.9% of the cases and complied with the SFR's best practice guidelines in 72.1% of the cases. Spinal CT scans were pathological in 91% of the patients. The more clearly the clinical indications were formulated, the more significantly the results were pathological. Overall, in 34.1% of the cases, the CT scans performed were deemed not to be justified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant number of spinal CT scans performed in Togo were not justified. Efforts must be made by both requesters and providers of medical imaging examinations to ensure judicious medical use of irradiating examinations in Togo.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The undeniable benefits of irradiating examinations such as computed tomography (CT) scans should not overshadow their potential harmful effects, particularly late risks. Hence, it is important to justify CT scans requested for patients. The aim of this study is to analyse the justification for CT scans in all health facilities with a functional medical scanner in Togo.

Methods: This was a prospective descriptive study of spinal CT scans performed between 1st June and 31st August 2021 and interpreted by a radiologist in seven functional CT units in Togo. The analysis of the justification was based in particular on the formulation of the clinical indication, the consistency of the clinical indication with the requested CT scan, and the compliance of the clinical indication with the Best Practice Guidelines of the Société Française de Radiologie (SFR) and the Société Française de Médecine Nucléaire (SFMN).

Results: The 355 spinal CT scans included were exclusively cervical, dorsal and lumbar in 15.5%, 3.1% and 68.2% of the patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 48.2 years, with a sex ratio of 1.1:1.0. Approximately 69% of patients had a spinal CT scan within 3 days or less. Specialist (70.2%) and general practitioner (22.3%) were the most frequent requesters; 92.1% of the patients requested a non-radiating or less radiating imaging test before the CT scan. Non-physician staff (paramedics) accounted for 2.5% of requesters. The formulation of the clinical indication was good in 89.9%, acceptable in 7.6% and wrong in 2.5% of the patients. These indications were consistent with the examination requested in 98.9% of the cases and complied with the SFR's best practice guidelines in 72.1% of the cases. Spinal CT scans were pathological in 91% of the patients. The more clearly the clinical indications were formulated, the more significantly the results were pathological. Overall, in 34.1% of the cases, the CT scans performed were deemed not to be justified.

Conclusion: A significant number of spinal CT scans performed in Togo were not justified. Efforts must be made by both requesters and providers of medical imaging examinations to ensure judicious medical use of irradiating examinations in Togo.

在多哥进行脊柱计算机断层扫描(CT)的理由分析。
引言:不可否认的是,诸如计算机断层扫描(CT)等放射检查的益处不应掩盖其潜在的有害影响,特别是晚期风险。因此,对患者要求的CT扫描进行证明是很重要的。本研究的目的是分析在多哥所有配备功能性医疗扫描仪的卫生设施中进行CT扫描的理由。方法:这是一项前瞻性描述性研究,对2021年6月1日至8月31日期间进行的脊柱CT扫描进行了分析,并由放射科医生在多哥的七个功能CT单元中进行了分析。对理由的分析主要基于临床适应症的制定、临床适应症与所要求的CT扫描的一致性,以及临床适应症是否符合法国放射学会(SFR)和法国 医学会(smn)的最佳实践指南。结果:355例脊柱CT扫描均为颈椎、背侧和腰椎,分别占15.5%、3.1%和68.2%。患者平均年龄48.2岁,性别比为1.1:1.0。大约69%的患者在3天或更短时间内进行了脊柱CT扫描。专科医生(70.2%)和全科医生(22.3%)是最常见的求诊者;92.1%的患者要求在CT扫描前做无辐射或低辐射的影像学检查。非医师工作人员(护理人员)占请求者的2.5%。临床指征的制定合格率为89.9%,可接受率为7.6%,错误率为2.5%。这些适应症与98.9%的病例所要求的检查一致,72.1%的病例符合SFR的最佳实践指南。91%的患者脊柱CT扫描呈病理。临床指征越明确,病理结果越明显。总体而言,34.1%的病例认为CT扫描不合理。结论:在多哥进行的大量脊柱CT扫描是不合理的。医疗成像检查的请求者和提供者都必须作出努力,确保在多哥明智地在医疗上使用辐射检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信