Timing and Mode of Death Following ECPR: A Single Centre, Retrospective Analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Humphrey G M Walker, Alexander S Richardson, Arne Diehl, Aidan Burrell
{"title":"Timing and Mode of Death Following ECPR: A Single Centre, Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Humphrey G M Walker, Alexander S Richardson, Arne Diehl, Aidan Burrell","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently little is known about the timing and modality in which people die following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). This is important as it may define potential therapeutic targets, pathways for improvement in ECPR outcomes, and resource implications. Therefore, we undertook a study to analyse the mechanisms and timeframes of death within the first 28 days in a high-volume Australian ECPR centre.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a single-centre, retrospective review from 1 January 2017 until 31 December 2022. All patients undergoing ECPR were analysed. Modality of death was classified into neurological (subclassified as brain death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment [WLST] without brain death) or non-neurological (subclassified as refractory shock or non-neurological WLST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 patients were included. Overall, 52/95 (54.7%) had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In total, 51/95 (53.7 %) had died by day 28. The most common modality of death was neurological WLST without brain death. The earliest modality of death to occur was refractory shock. Median survival times were 0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 0-2) for patients with refractory shock, 2 days (IQR 1-4) for brain death, 3 days (IQR 1-8) for non-neurological WLST and 9 days (IQR 2-14) for neurological WLST without brain death. Four (7.8%) patients underwent organ donation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mortality post ECPR remains high. Refractory shock is the earliest modality of death while neurological WLST without brain death is most common, occurring several days later. Understanding the different phenotypes of death post-ECPR is important to identify future potential therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently little is known about the timing and modality in which people die following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). This is important as it may define potential therapeutic targets, pathways for improvement in ECPR outcomes, and resource implications. Therefore, we undertook a study to analyse the mechanisms and timeframes of death within the first 28 days in a high-volume Australian ECPR centre.

Method: This was a single-centre, retrospective review from 1 January 2017 until 31 December 2022. All patients undergoing ECPR were analysed. Modality of death was classified into neurological (subclassified as brain death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment [WLST] without brain death) or non-neurological (subclassified as refractory shock or non-neurological WLST).

Results: A total of 95 patients were included. Overall, 52/95 (54.7%) had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In total, 51/95 (53.7 %) had died by day 28. The most common modality of death was neurological WLST without brain death. The earliest modality of death to occur was refractory shock. Median survival times were 0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 0-2) for patients with refractory shock, 2 days (IQR 1-4) for brain death, 3 days (IQR 1-8) for non-neurological WLST and 9 days (IQR 2-14) for neurological WLST without brain death. Four (7.8%) patients underwent organ donation.

Conclusions: Mortality post ECPR remains high. Refractory shock is the earliest modality of death while neurological WLST without brain death is most common, occurring several days later. Understanding the different phenotypes of death post-ECPR is important to identify future potential therapeutic targets.

ECPR后死亡时间和方式:单中心回顾性分析
背景:目前,人们对体外心肺复苏(ECPR)后死亡的时间和方式知之甚少。这很重要,因为它可以确定潜在的治疗靶点、改善ECPR结果的途径和资源意义。因此,我们进行了一项研究,分析了澳大利亚一个大容量ECPR中心前28天内的死亡机制和时间框架。方法:这是一项从2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日的单中心回顾性研究。对所有接受ECPR的患者进行分析。死亡方式分为神经学(细分为脑死亡或无脑死亡的停止维持生命治疗[WLST])或非神经学(细分为难治性休克或非神经学WLST)。结果:共纳入95例患者。总体而言,52/95(54.7%)发生院外心脏骤停。共有51/95例(53.7%)在第28天死亡。最常见的死亡方式是无脑死亡的神经性WLST。最早的死亡形式是难治性休克。难治性休克患者的中位生存时间为0天(四分位数范围[IQR] 0-2),脑死亡患者的中位生存时间为2天(IQR 1-4),非神经性WLST患者的中位生存时间为3天(IQR 1-8),无脑死亡的神经性WLST患者的中位生存时间为9天(IQR 2-14)。4例(7.8%)患者接受器官捐献。结论:ECPR后的死亡率仍然很高。顽固性休克是最早的死亡形式,而无脑死亡的神经性WLST最常见,发生时间晚于几天。了解ecpr后死亡的不同表型对于确定未来潜在的治疗靶点非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信