Peiqi Xing, Pedro Bak-Gordon, Jindou Xie, Jian Zhang, Zhaoqi Liu, James L Manley
{"title":"SUGP1 loss drives SF3B1 hotspot mutant missplicing in cancer.","authors":"Peiqi Xing, Pedro Bak-Gordon, Jindou Xie, Jian Zhang, Zhaoqi Liu, James L Manley","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SF3B1 is the most frequently mutated splicing factor in cancer. Such mutations cause missplicing by promoting aberrant 3' splice site usage; however, how this occurs mechanistically remains controversial. To address this issue, we employed a computational screen of 600 splicing-related proteins to identify those whose reduced expression recapitulates mutant SF3B1-induced splicing dysregulation. Strikingly, our analysis reveals only two proteins whose knockdown or knockout reproduces this effect. Extending our previous findings, loss of the G-patch protein SUGP1 recapitulates almost all splicing defects induced by SF3B1 hotspot mutations. Unexpectedly, loss of the RNA helicase Aquarius (AQR) reproduces ∼40% of these defects. However, we find that AQR knockdown causes significant SUGP1 missplicing and reduced SUGP1 levels, suggesting that AQR loss reproduces mutant SF3B1 splicing defects only indirectly. This study advances our understanding of missplicing caused by oncogenic SF3B1 mutations and highlights the fundamental role of SUGP1 in this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":9798,"journal":{"name":"Cell reports","volume":"44 8","pages":"116075"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SF3B1 is the most frequently mutated splicing factor in cancer. Such mutations cause missplicing by promoting aberrant 3' splice site usage; however, how this occurs mechanistically remains controversial. To address this issue, we employed a computational screen of 600 splicing-related proteins to identify those whose reduced expression recapitulates mutant SF3B1-induced splicing dysregulation. Strikingly, our analysis reveals only two proteins whose knockdown or knockout reproduces this effect. Extending our previous findings, loss of the G-patch protein SUGP1 recapitulates almost all splicing defects induced by SF3B1 hotspot mutations. Unexpectedly, loss of the RNA helicase Aquarius (AQR) reproduces ∼40% of these defects. However, we find that AQR knockdown causes significant SUGP1 missplicing and reduced SUGP1 levels, suggesting that AQR loss reproduces mutant SF3B1 splicing defects only indirectly. This study advances our understanding of missplicing caused by oncogenic SF3B1 mutations and highlights the fundamental role of SUGP1 in this process.
期刊介绍:
Cell Reports publishes high-quality research across the life sciences and focuses on new biological insight as its primary criterion for publication. The journal offers three primary article types: Reports, which are shorter single-point articles, research articles, which are longer and provide deeper mechanistic insights, and resources, which highlight significant technical advances or major informational datasets that contribute to biological advances. Reviews covering recent literature in emerging and active fields are also accepted.
The Cell Reports Portfolio includes gold open-access journals that cover life, medical, and physical sciences, and its mission is to make cutting-edge research and methodologies available to a wide readership.
The journal's professional in-house editors work closely with authors, reviewers, and the scientific advisory board, which consists of current and future leaders in their respective fields. The advisory board guides the scope, content, and quality of the journal, but editorial decisions are independently made by the in-house scientific editors of Cell Reports.