Martijn Schoenmakers, Jesper Tijmstra, Jeroen Vermunt, Maria Bolsinova
{"title":"Posterior predictive checks for the detection of extreme response style.","authors":"Martijn Schoenmakers, Jesper Tijmstra, Jeroen Vermunt, Maria Bolsinova","doi":"10.3758/s13428-025-02756-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extreme response style (ERS), the tendency of participants to select extreme item categories regardless of the item content, has frequently been found to decrease the validity of Likert-type questionnaire results (e.g., Moors, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 271-298, 2012). For this reason, detecting ERS at both the group and individual levels is of paramount importance. While various approaches to detecting ERS exist, these may conflate ERS with the trait of interest, require additional questionnaires to be administered, or require the use of mixture or multidimensional IRT models. As an alternative approach to detecting ERS, Bayesian posterior predictive checks (PPCs) may be a viable option. Posterior predictive checking offers a highly customizable framework for detecting model misfit, which can be directly applied to frequently used unidimensional IRT models. Critically, the use of PPCs to detect ERS does not require strong assumptions regarding the nature of ERS, such as ERS being a continuous dimension or a categorical trait. In this paper, we thus apply PPCs to a generalized partial credit model to detect model misfit related to ERS on both the group and person levels. We propose various possible PPCs tailored to ERS, which are illustrated in an empirical example, and their performance in detecting ERS is examined under various conditions. Suggestions for practical applications are provided, and avenues for future research are explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 9","pages":"234"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02756-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extreme response style (ERS), the tendency of participants to select extreme item categories regardless of the item content, has frequently been found to decrease the validity of Likert-type questionnaire results (e.g., Moors, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 271-298, 2012). For this reason, detecting ERS at both the group and individual levels is of paramount importance. While various approaches to detecting ERS exist, these may conflate ERS with the trait of interest, require additional questionnaires to be administered, or require the use of mixture or multidimensional IRT models. As an alternative approach to detecting ERS, Bayesian posterior predictive checks (PPCs) may be a viable option. Posterior predictive checking offers a highly customizable framework for detecting model misfit, which can be directly applied to frequently used unidimensional IRT models. Critically, the use of PPCs to detect ERS does not require strong assumptions regarding the nature of ERS, such as ERS being a continuous dimension or a categorical trait. In this paper, we thus apply PPCs to a generalized partial credit model to detect model misfit related to ERS on both the group and person levels. We propose various possible PPCs tailored to ERS, which are illustrated in an empirical example, and their performance in detecting ERS is examined under various conditions. Suggestions for practical applications are provided, and avenues for future research are explored.
极端反应风格(ERS),即参与者不考虑项目内容而选择极端项目类别的倾向,经常被发现会降低李克特型问卷结果的效度(例如,Moors, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 271-298, 2012)。因此,在群体和个体水平上检测ERS是至关重要的。虽然存在各种检测ERS的方法,但这些方法可能将ERS与感兴趣的特征混为一谈,需要进行额外的问卷调查,或者需要使用混合或多维IRT模型。作为检测ERS的替代方法,贝叶斯后验预测检查(PPCs)可能是一个可行的选择。后验预测检查提供了一个高度可定制的框架来检测模型不拟合,可以直接应用于经常使用的一维IRT模型。关键的是,使用PPCs检测ERS不需要对ERS的性质进行强有力的假设,例如ERS是连续维度或分类特征。因此,在本文中,我们将PPCs应用于广义部分信用模型,以检测与群体和个人层面上的ERS相关的模型不拟合。我们提出了适合ERS的各种可能的PPCs,并在一个经验例子中进行了说明,并在各种条件下检查了它们在检测ERS中的性能。提出了实际应用建议,并对未来的研究方向进行了探讨。
期刊介绍:
Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.