Surgeon Attitudes to Guideline-Concordant Extended Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Cancer Surgery Within a Regional Health System: A Qualitative Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-27 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17870-0
Megan K Scharner, Shannon Phillips, Nivetha Baskar, Natalie Koren, Maggie Westfal, Thomas Curran
{"title":"Surgeon Attitudes to Guideline-Concordant Extended Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Cancer Surgery Within a Regional Health System: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Megan K Scharner, Shannon Phillips, Nivetha Baskar, Natalie Koren, Maggie Westfal, Thomas Curran","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17870-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While infrequent, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after cancer surgery. Extended pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis (ePPX) decreases VTE risk and is recommended by professional societies. Observational studies have shown limited ePPX utilization, although reasons for non-adherence have not been forthcoming from existing data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to obtain insight toward surgeon practices and attitudes regarding ePPX within a regional health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 surgeons and 2 advanced practice providers who perform gastrointestinal, urologic, or gynecologic cancer resections. Interviews characterized perceptions of VTE risk, VTE prevention strategies, and an electronic medical record-based decision support tool to improve ePPX utilization. Transcripts were thematically analyzed with conceptual coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen surgeons and two advance-practice providers were interviewed; 5 were female. Six surgeons practice in the community and seven practice in the academic setting. Sixty percent (n = 9; 8 academic) of providers utilized ePPX 'routinely', with professional society guidelines and medical literature the most cited reasons. Thirty-three percent (n = 5; 4 community) of providers utilized ePPX 'selectively', with injection medication and surgeon routine the most cited reasons. One community surgeon 'never' utilized ePPX. Academic providers were more likely to utilize ePPX than community providers. All providers were open to the electronic medical record decision support tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diverse practice patterns of ePPX were identified across providers, with community surgeons more likely to prescribe ePPX selectively or never. Surgeon education, utilization of an oral medication, and cost mitigation may improve ePPX adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7596-7603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17870-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While infrequent, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after cancer surgery. Extended pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis (ePPX) decreases VTE risk and is recommended by professional societies. Observational studies have shown limited ePPX utilization, although reasons for non-adherence have not been forthcoming from existing data.

Objective: The aim of this study was to obtain insight toward surgeon practices and attitudes regarding ePPX within a regional health system.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 surgeons and 2 advanced practice providers who perform gastrointestinal, urologic, or gynecologic cancer resections. Interviews characterized perceptions of VTE risk, VTE prevention strategies, and an electronic medical record-based decision support tool to improve ePPX utilization. Transcripts were thematically analyzed with conceptual coding.

Results: Thirteen surgeons and two advance-practice providers were interviewed; 5 were female. Six surgeons practice in the community and seven practice in the academic setting. Sixty percent (n = 9; 8 academic) of providers utilized ePPX 'routinely', with professional society guidelines and medical literature the most cited reasons. Thirty-three percent (n = 5; 4 community) of providers utilized ePPX 'selectively', with injection medication and surgeon routine the most cited reasons. One community surgeon 'never' utilized ePPX. Academic providers were more likely to utilize ePPX than community providers. All providers were open to the electronic medical record decision support tool.

Conclusions: Diverse practice patterns of ePPX were identified across providers, with community surgeons more likely to prescribe ePPX selectively or never. Surgeon education, utilization of an oral medication, and cost mitigation may improve ePPX adherence.

在区域卫生系统内,外科医生对癌症手术后符合指南的扩展药物静脉血栓栓塞预防的态度:一项定性研究。
背景:虽然不常见,但静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是癌症手术后发病和死亡的重要原因。延长静脉血栓栓塞药物预防(ePPX)可降低静脉血栓栓塞风险,并被专业协会推荐。观察性研究显示ePPX的使用有限,尽管不遵守的原因尚未从现有数据中得到。目的:本研究的目的是了解外科医生的做法和态度,在区域卫生系统内的ePPX。方法:对13名外科医生和2名从事胃肠道、泌尿系统或妇科肿瘤切除术的高级执业医师进行半结构化访谈。访谈的特点是对静脉血栓栓塞风险的认识、静脉血栓栓塞预防策略和基于电子病历的决策支持工具,以提高ePPX的利用率。用概念编码对转录本进行主题分析。结果:访谈了13名外科医生和2名高级执业医师;5名女性。六名外科医生在社区执业,七名在学术环境中执业。60% (n = 9;8 .学术)提供者“常规”使用ePPX,专业协会指南和医学文献是引用最多的原因。33% (n = 5;(4个社区)的提供者“选择性地”使用ePPX,注射药物和外科手术常规是被引用最多的原因。一位社区外科医生“从未”使用过ePPX。学术提供者比社区提供者更有可能使用ePPX。所有供应商都对电子病历决策支持工具持开放态度。结论:ePPX的实践模式不同,社区外科医生更有可能选择性地开ePPX或从不开。外科医生的教育、口服药物的使用和费用的降低可以提高ePPX的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信