Populism and Trust in the Public Service in Canada

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Jared J. Wesley, Brendan Boyd
{"title":"Populism and Trust in the Public Service in Canada","authors":"Jared J. Wesley,&nbsp;Brendan Boyd","doi":"10.1111/gove.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Denigrating public servants has been a key feature of populists movements that seek to prioritize the individual and “common people” over “establishment elites”. In Canada, mainstream conservative party leaders claim “Canada is broken” and openly advocate for “getting rid of the gatekeepers,” for example, while right-wing populists often promote the dangers of the “deep state.” Despite these developments, we do not know whether and how populist attitudes relate to citizens' trust in the public service. We use public opinion data from a nationwide survey to determine that populism exerts an independent effect on public trust in the bureaucracy beyond democratic satisfaction and efficacy. Our findings suggest that, even when controlling for those other factors, populist attitudes remain the strongest determinants of public trust in public servants. This leads us to an important discussion of the impact of populism on the stability, legitimacy, and performance of the public service, particularly as populist leaders assume positions of power and control over the bureaucracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48056,"journal":{"name":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gove.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Denigrating public servants has been a key feature of populists movements that seek to prioritize the individual and “common people” over “establishment elites”. In Canada, mainstream conservative party leaders claim “Canada is broken” and openly advocate for “getting rid of the gatekeepers,” for example, while right-wing populists often promote the dangers of the “deep state.” Despite these developments, we do not know whether and how populist attitudes relate to citizens' trust in the public service. We use public opinion data from a nationwide survey to determine that populism exerts an independent effect on public trust in the bureaucracy beyond democratic satisfaction and efficacy. Our findings suggest that, even when controlling for those other factors, populist attitudes remain the strongest determinants of public trust in public servants. This leads us to an important discussion of the impact of populism on the stability, legitimacy, and performance of the public service, particularly as populist leaders assume positions of power and control over the bureaucracy.

Abstract Image

民粹主义与加拿大公共服务信任
诋毁公务员一直是民粹主义运动的一个关键特征,民粹主义运动寻求将个人和“普通人”置于“建制精英”之上。在加拿大,主流保守党领导人声称“加拿大已经破碎”,并公开主张“摆脱守门人”,而右翼民粹主义者则经常宣扬“深层国家”的危险。尽管有这些发展,我们不知道民粹主义态度是否以及如何与公民对公共服务的信任有关。我们使用一项全国性调查的民意数据来确定,民粹主义对公众对官僚的信任产生了独立的影响,超出了民主满意度和效率。我们的研究结果表明,即使控制了这些其他因素,民粹主义态度仍然是公众对公务员信任的最重要决定因素。这让我们对民粹主义对公共服务的稳定性、合法性和绩效的影响进行了重要的讨论,特别是当民粹主义领导人掌握权力并控制官僚机构时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Governance provides a forum for the theoretical and practical discussion of executive politics, public policy, administration, and the organization of the state. Published in association with International Political Science Association''s Research Committee on the Structure & Organization of Government (SOG), it emphasizes peer-reviewed articles that take an international or comparative approach to public policy and administration. All papers, regardless of empirical focus, should have wider theoretical, comparative, or practical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信