Decarbonizing China's Freight Sector: Spatial Impacts of Carbon Taxation on Trade Patterns and Production Allocation in a CGE Framework

IF 8.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1029/2025EF006300
Xian Wang, Junfeng Liu, Huihuang Wu, Xiurong Hu, Yuqing Wang, Ying Liu, Jianmin Ma, Shu Tao
{"title":"Decarbonizing China's Freight Sector: Spatial Impacts of Carbon Taxation on Trade Patterns and Production Allocation in a CGE Framework","authors":"Xian Wang,&nbsp;Junfeng Liu,&nbsp;Huihuang Wu,&nbsp;Xiurong Hu,&nbsp;Yuqing Wang,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Jianmin Ma,&nbsp;Shu Tao","doi":"10.1029/2025EF006300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reducing emissions in the freight sector is a key focus in China's pursuit of sustainability. Previous studies have not adequately addressed the complex interplay between freight activity, commodity movements, and geographical distances in evaluating mitigation policies. Here, we developed a new distance-based computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to address the freight costs between regions, enabling a detailed analysis of the spatial trade patterns, production relocation, and environmental impacts of different carbon tax scenarios on the freight sector. We found that a substantial carbon tax collection (700 CNY/ton CO<sub>2</sub> by 2025) could reduce China's total freight turnover by 1.60% and cut industry-wide CO<sub>2</sub> emission by approximately 200 million tons (accounting for 1.8% of total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China). The response to freight carbon tax varies with distance: longer bilateral trade distances experience a sharper decline in freight volume, while shorter intra-provincial and neighboring interprovincial trade becomes more prosperous. Production activity tends to relocate to regions closer to customers and suppliers under the carbon tax, and each additional 1,000 km trade distance is associated with 0.3–1.2% reduction in provincial production. By integrating a spatial dimension into a CGE framework, our study elucidates how freight cost redistributes policy costs and benefits across regions, offering a more nuanced foundation for the design of targeted, regionally balanced carbon tax policies in China's freight decarbonization strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EF006300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF006300","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing emissions in the freight sector is a key focus in China's pursuit of sustainability. Previous studies have not adequately addressed the complex interplay between freight activity, commodity movements, and geographical distances in evaluating mitigation policies. Here, we developed a new distance-based computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to address the freight costs between regions, enabling a detailed analysis of the spatial trade patterns, production relocation, and environmental impacts of different carbon tax scenarios on the freight sector. We found that a substantial carbon tax collection (700 CNY/ton CO2 by 2025) could reduce China's total freight turnover by 1.60% and cut industry-wide CO2 emission by approximately 200 million tons (accounting for 1.8% of total CO2 emissions in China). The response to freight carbon tax varies with distance: longer bilateral trade distances experience a sharper decline in freight volume, while shorter intra-provincial and neighboring interprovincial trade becomes more prosperous. Production activity tends to relocate to regions closer to customers and suppliers under the carbon tax, and each additional 1,000 km trade distance is associated with 0.3–1.2% reduction in provincial production. By integrating a spatial dimension into a CGE framework, our study elucidates how freight cost redistributes policy costs and benefits across regions, offering a more nuanced foundation for the design of targeted, regionally balanced carbon tax policies in China's freight decarbonization strategy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中国货运业脱碳:CGE框架下碳税对贸易模式和生产配置的空间影响
减少货运业的排放是中国追求可持续发展的一个重点。在评估缓解政策时,以前的研究没有充分处理货运活动、商品流动和地理距离之间复杂的相互作用。本文建立了一个新的基于距离的可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型,以解决区域间的货运成本问题,从而详细分析了不同碳税情景下货运部门的空间贸易格局、生产转移和环境影响。我们发现,大量征收碳税(到2025年达到700元/吨二氧化碳)可以使中国的货运周转量减少1.60%,并使全行业的二氧化碳排放量减少约2亿吨(占中国二氧化碳排放总量的1.8%)。对运费碳税的响应随距离的不同而不同:双边贸易距离越远,货运量下降幅度越大,而省内和邻近省际贸易则越繁荣。在碳税下,生产活动倾向于迁移到离客户和供应商更近的地区,每增加1000公里的贸易距离,各省的产量就会减少0.3-1.2%。通过将空间维度整合到CGE框架中,我们的研究阐明了货运成本如何在区域间重新分配政策成本和收益,为设计中国货运脱碳战略中有针对性的、区域平衡的碳税政策提供了更细致入微的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信