Clinical Evaluation of the Healgen Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test as a Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tool

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Stephen A. Young, Hua Zhang, Jose Rodriguez, David Mishkin, Ward Paine, Li Seyfried, LaTisha Hargrove, Dennis L. Broyles, Chermaen Lindberg, Anurag Purushothaman, Stacey House
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of the Healgen Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test as a Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tool","authors":"Stephen A. Young,&nbsp;Hua Zhang,&nbsp;Jose Rodriguez,&nbsp;David Mishkin,&nbsp;Ward Paine,&nbsp;Li Seyfried,&nbsp;LaTisha Hargrove,&nbsp;Dennis L. Broyles,&nbsp;Chermaen Lindberg,&nbsp;Anurag Purushothaman,&nbsp;Stacey House","doi":"10.1002/iid3.70228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Development of readily available Rapid COVID-19 Antigen tests essential for promptly identifying SARS-CoV2 infection and preventing its spread.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the clinical performance of the Healgen Rapid COVID-19 antigen test as a point-of-care diagnostic tool with 806 evaluable subjects who were within 6 days post-symptom onset. The results from the Healgen test were compared to the results from Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) approved SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of the 806 evaluable subjects, 140 tested positive and 640 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 with the Healgen COVID-19 test, showing good agreement with the EUA RT-PCR results. There were 26 subjects with discordant results, of which 24 were negative according to the Healgen test but positive according to the RT-PCR test, while 2 were positive by the Healgen test but negative by the EUA-PCR test. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were 85.4% and 99.7%, respectively. Additionally, the Healgen COVID-19 test detected 34 cases (60.7%) out of 56 weak positive cases (based on Ct values of ≥ 30 by the EUA PCR test), demonstrating good detection capability of the test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Healgen Rapid COVID-19 antigen detection test demonstrated good performance in terms of PPA and NPA when compared to the EUA RT-PCR assays and has potential as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13289,"journal":{"name":"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iid3.70228","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Development of readily available Rapid COVID-19 Antigen tests essential for promptly identifying SARS-CoV2 infection and preventing its spread.

Methods

This study evaluated the clinical performance of the Healgen Rapid COVID-19 antigen test as a point-of-care diagnostic tool with 806 evaluable subjects who were within 6 days post-symptom onset. The results from the Healgen test were compared to the results from Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) approved SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests.

Results

Out of the 806 evaluable subjects, 140 tested positive and 640 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 with the Healgen COVID-19 test, showing good agreement with the EUA RT-PCR results. There were 26 subjects with discordant results, of which 24 were negative according to the Healgen test but positive according to the RT-PCR test, while 2 were positive by the Healgen test but negative by the EUA-PCR test. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were 85.4% and 99.7%, respectively. Additionally, the Healgen COVID-19 test detected 34 cases (60.7%) out of 56 weak positive cases (based on Ct values of ≥ 30 by the EUA PCR test), demonstrating good detection capability of the test.

Conclusions

The Healgen Rapid COVID-19 antigen detection test demonstrated good performance in terms of PPA and NPA when compared to the EUA RT-PCR assays and has potential as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2.

Healgen快速COVID-19抗原检测作为即时诊断工具的临床评价
开发易于获得的快速COVID-19抗原检测试剂盒,对于及时识别SARS-CoV2感染和防止其传播至关重要。方法本研究对806名症状出现后6天内可评价的被试进行Healgen快速COVID-19抗原检测作为一种即时诊断工具的临床评价。将Healgen测试的结果与紧急使用授权(EUA)批准的SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR测试的结果进行了比较。结果在806名可评估受试者中,Healgen COVID-19检测结果为140例阳性,640例阴性,与EUA RT-PCR结果吻合良好。结果不一致者26例,其中Healgen试验阴性24例,RT-PCR试验阳性;Healgen试验阳性2例,EUA-PCR试验阴性。同意率(PPA)为85.4%,同意率(NPA)为99.7%。此外,在56例弱阳性病例中(以EUA PCR检测Ct值≥30计算),Healgen新冠肺炎检测检测出34例(60.7%),显示出较好的检测能力。结论与EUA RT-PCR相比,Healgen Rapid COVID-19抗原检测试剂盒在PPA和NPA方面表现良好,具有作为SARS-CoV-2诊断工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Immunity, Inflammation and Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research across the broad field of immunology. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease gives rapid consideration to papers in all areas of clinical and basic research. The journal is indexed in Medline and the Science Citation Index Expanded (part of Web of Science), among others. It welcomes original work that enhances the understanding of immunology in areas including: • cellular and molecular immunology • clinical immunology • allergy • immunochemistry • immunogenetics • immune signalling • immune development • imaging • mathematical modelling • autoimmunity • transplantation immunology • cancer immunology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信